Dunning–Kruger effect
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a psychological phenomenon where individuals with low ability or knowledge in a specific area mistakenly believe they possess a high level of competency. This bias often leads unskilled individuals, such as poor singers or inexperienced athletes, to overestimate their actual abilities, while those who are more skilled tend to underestimate their performance. The term originates from research conducted by psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger, which demonstrated that a lack of metacognitive skills—essentially, the ability to evaluate one’s own knowledge and abilities—contributes to this misperception.
The implications of the Dunning-Kruger effect can be significant, influencing areas such as workplace dynamics, political engagement, and even personal relationships. Individuals who fail to recognize their shortcomings may struggle with career advancement and receive unfavorable evaluations without understanding why. Furthermore, in a broader context, the effect can lead to a societal undervaluation of expertise, as people increasingly question or reject the advice of professionals in favor of their own uninformed opinions.
To mitigate this effect, Dunning suggests that individuals seek honest feedback from peers, reflect on past predictions versus actual outcomes, and acknowledge the inherent limitations of self-awareness. By fostering a better understanding of their own capabilities and the knowledge of others, individuals can improve their self-assessment skills and overall competency.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Dunning–Kruger effect
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a psychological principle that finds people who are unskilled or ignorant in an area often believe they are actually highly skilled or educated in that area. For example, a terrible singer might believe he or she is an undiscovered talent worthy of Broadway, or an inept basketball player may view himself or herself as equal to or better than a professional athlete. David Dunning and Justin Kruger concluded that this effect was a result of people reaching incorrect conclusions and lacking the ability to see this shortcoming. In their studies, they found that incompetent people were unable to assess their own abilities objectively, and they were unable to recognize others' competence.
The principle has been examined in terms of workplace performance, politics, and personal relationships. Its primary researcher, Dunning, has suggested a number of ways individuals can counteract the human failing to evaluate oneself objectively.
Background
Psychologist David Dunning and his graduate student, Justin Kruger, observed the effect at Cornell University through four studies. They tested subjects on humor, grammar, and logic. The humor test, for example, asked sixty-five subjects to rate jokes for how funny they were and compared the answers to those of eight professional comedians. They asked the participants in the bottom quartile to estimate their ability and performance on the tests. Although the subjects were in the twelfth percentile, they predicted they had scored in the sixty-second percentile, far above their test results. The studies focused on metacognitive ability, or one's ability to think about one's thinking or evaluate one's performance. They also discovered that people who did well on the tests underestimated their performance. This was not due to lack of confidence, however. The subjects believed the other participants would perform better than they did. Dunning and Kruger published the results of their studies in 1999 as "Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments."
Other studies have found the Dunning-Kruger effect extends beyond one's evaluation of one's skills. Studies show that people overestimate their likelihood of performing benevolent acts. They believe they are more likely to help a charity or perform a civic duty, such as vote, than they really are. Studies have found people often overestimate the speed at which they can complete a task—for example, many college students predict they will complete an assignment much sooner than they do, and individuals often believe they will file income tax forms with time to spare but actually scramble to file on time.
Overview
The Dunning-Kruger effect can have serious repercussions for individuals and organizations. People who do not recognize their shortcomings and believe they are of superior abilities are unable to improve. They may be angry and frustrated by poor work evaluations and question the reasons they are given low scores for their work. Until they are able to assess their abilities accurately, they are not motivated to learn and gain skills. They may experience career stagnation, lose their jobs, or create a workplace environment full of tension.
Other researchers have questioned whether overconfidence is in fact a hindrance. Modern society has come to value optimism and confidence, even in the face of proof that the self-assurance is far beyond the individual's true abilities. For example, patients are often encouraged to be overly optimistic about recovery from disease, and this may in fact help. In other situations, overconfidence can be destructive. Many companies project greater returns on investments than they can achieve, which often leads to financial losses that affect employees and investors. Studies have found that elderly people who believe they are better than average drivers are four times more likely to be assessed as unsafe in testing, while those who have more modest assessments of their skills generally perform better.
Dunning concluded that people are unable to assess themselves accurately because they do not have all the information they need to see themselves clearly. He found that they did not appear to fool themselves willfully. Rather, they made mistakes because they did not have the skill and knowledge they needed. Furthermore, they did not have the knowledge to recognize their actions as mistakes or see others' actions as better choices. People often do not know what they do not know.
Metacognition, or thinking about thinking, can be learned. Subjects who improved their skills in the 1999 Dunning-Kruger tests—for example, some were given a brief lesson on solving the logic problems—were able to evaluate their performance better. Employees who take constructive criticism seriously, rather than discount it as inaccurate, may learn to improve workplace performance.
Dunning suggested three steps to help people know themselves more accurately. First, people should recognize that individuals in their circles have valuable knowledge to offer. One may ask trusted friends and colleagues for honest feedback and carefully consider it. If a person hears similar information from several people, it might offer significant insight. People may also learn about themselves by watching how others handle situations, evaluating the outcome, and comparing others' actions to their own in similar circumstances. His second suggestion is to change the self-prediction process. An individual can look at information about previous predictions and outcomes and see how realistic they were. Did the person meet a deadline or achieve a goal? Third, a person should accept that no one is completely self-aware. Recognize that everyone makes faulty predictions and adjust expectations based on experiences.
Scholars have suggested that the Dunning-Kruger effect could explain an increasingly common phenomenon—questioning and rejecting experts. Many experts in various fields report they have been called elitists, or they have been accused of supporting an agenda. Some point to the real dangers of rejecting authorities, such as the resurgence of various diseases because people have refused to vaccinate their children against illnesses despite experts' warnings. Scholars suggest modern communication methods have contributed to the proliferation of people exhibiting the Dunning-Kruger effect. Blogging, for example, has become commonplace, and some people reject mainstream media reports in favor of unsubstantiated claims that fit their belief systems. Unmodified comments sections on news articles contain contributions from anonymous readers who are free to make claims without having to provide any evidence.
A number of reports have examined the Dunning-Kruger effect in politics as well. Political leaders, for example, have traditionally sought out experts to advise them on issues. Politicians who experience the Dunning-Kruger effect may instead feel overconfident in their own expertise and discount expert advice unless it echoes their own opinions. Such politicians may also promote overly simplistic or flawed solutions to their constituents' challenges. Paradoxically, voters may be drawn to support such leaders due to their self-confidence, even if it is not justified.
Bibliography
Abrahams, Marc. "Those Who Can't, Don't Know It." Harvard Business Review, Dec. 2005, hbr.org/2005/12/those-who-cant-dont-know-it. Accessed 7 Feb. 2025.
Dunning, David. "Strangers to Ourselves?" The British Psychological Society, vol. 19, Oct. 2006, pp. 600–603.
Dunning, David. "Why Incompetent People Think They're Amazing—David Dunning." TED Ed, 9 Nov. 2017, ed.ted.com/lessons/why-incompetent-people-think-they-re-amazing-david-dunning. Accessed 7 Feb. 2025.
Dunning, David, et al. "Why People Fail to Recognize Their Own Incompetence." Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 12, 2003.
Flam, Faye. "Trump's 'Dangerous Disability'? It's the Dunning-Kruger Effect." Bloomberg, 12 May 2017, www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-05-12/trump-s-dangerous-disability-it-s-the-dunning-kruger-effect. Accessed 7 Feb. 2025.
Kruger, J., and D. Dunning. "Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 77, no. 6, 1999, pp. 1121–1134.
Lee, Chris. "Revisiting Why Incompetents Think They're Awesome." Ars Technica, 4 Nov. 2016, arstechnica.com/science/2016/11/revisiting-why-incompetents-think-theyre-awesome/. Accessed 7 Feb. 2025.
Murphy, Mark. "The Dunning-Kruger Effect Shows Why Some People Think They're Great Even When Their Work Is Terrible." Forbes, 24 Jan. 2017, www.forbes.com/sites/markmurphy/2017/01/24/the-dunning-kruger-effect-shows-why-some-people-think-theyre-great-even-when-their-work-is-terrible/#44921eee5d7c. Accessed 7 Feb. 2025.
Nichols, Tom. "The Death of Expertise." Federalist, 17 Jan. 2014, thefederalist.com/2014/01/17/the-death-of-expertise/. Accessed 7 Feb. 2025.
Pilat, Dan, and Sekoul Krastev. "Why Do We Fail to Accurately Gauge Our Own Abilities?" The Decision Lab, 2025, thedecisionlab.com/biases/dunning-kruger-effect. Accessed 7 Feb. 2025.
Poundstone, William. "The Dunning-Kruger President." Psychology Today, 21 Jan. 2017, www.psychologytoday.com/blog/head-in-the-cloud/201701/the-dunning-kruger-president. Accessed 7 Feb. 2025.
Sloman, Steven, and Philip Fernbach. The Knowledge Illusion: Why We Never Think Alone. Riverhead Books, 2017.