Camouflage (zoology)
Camouflage in zoology refers to various strategies that animals use to avoid detection by predators or prey, enabling them to survive in their environments. One of the most recognized forms is background matching, where an animal's coloration blends with its immediate surroundings, such as a green aphid on a green leaf. However, effective camouflage often requires more sophisticated techniques, particularly for larger animals that inhabit diverse environments. Disruptive coloration, which employs patterns like stripes or spots to break up the outline of an animal's body, is another common method observed in species like zebras and certain mammals.
Countershading further enhances camouflage by providing animals with darker coloration on their upper side and lighter tones underneath, effectively disguising their shape in various lighting conditions. Protective mimicry allows some animals to imitate inanimate objects, such as leaves or thorns, to evade detection. Additionally, behavior plays a crucial role in camouflage effectiveness; for instance, stationary predators must be well-camouflaged to catch their prey, while fast-moving species may rely less on concealment. Camouflage is not solely a visual phenomenon; it also encompasses other sensory modalities, meaning that animals must consider sounds, scents, and vibrations to remain undetected. Overall, camouflage is a complex and critical adaptation that enhances the survival of many species across different ecosystems.
Camouflage (zoology)
Crypsis is the art of remaining hidden. Camouflage is usually thought of as color matching: a green aphid, for example, is likely to go unnoticed while feeding on a green leaf. Background matching, or cryptic coloration, is, indeed, the most common form of camouflage, but most crypsis involves far more than matching a single color. Very small animals, such as aphids, can get away with using a single camouflage color because they are much smaller than the plants on which they spend their entire lives: they only need to match one thing. Most animals, however—even most insects—are significantly larger than aphids and are likely to spend time in more than one place. Their camouflage must be more sophisticated if it is to be useful.
If a large organism is to remain undetected, it must be camouflaged with respect to an entire scene. One way to do this is with disruptive coloration—using stripes, spots, or patches of color for camouflage. Disruptive coloration can involve large color patches, such as on a pinto pony, a tabby cat, or a diamond-backed rattlesnake, or it may involve tiny variations of color on each scale, feather, or hair. Many brownish or grayish mammals have agouti coloring, with three different colors appearing on each hair.
The irregular borders of multiple color patches on an animal’s body help to obscure its outline against an irregular and multicolored background, just like the blotchy greens and browns on military uniforms. An animal that has a mix of browns in its fur, feathers, skin, or scales, for example, will blend into a forest or even an open desert or tundra much better than one that is a single solid color. Even the black-and-white stripes of zebras, which seem so striking, act as a form of disruptive coloration: from far away, and especially to an animal such as a lion, which does not have good color vision, the stripes of zebras help them blend into the tall, wavy grasses of the savannah.
Countershading is another form of crypsis involving differently colored patches. Countershaded animals appear dark when viewed from above and light when viewed from underneath. Animals with countershading include orca whales with their black backs and white bellies, penguins, blue jays, red squirrels, stingrays, bullfrogs, and weasels. Countershading is effective and occurs in predator and prey mammals, reptiles, fish, birds, and insects because no matter where one lives—a desert, a forest, a meadow, or an ocean—the sun shines from above. When looking up toward the sun and sky, dark things stand out, and light colors blend in; when looking down toward the ground or the ocean floor, light colors stand out, and dark colors blend in. Countershaded predators can approach their prey with equal stealth from above or below; likewise, prey species that are countershaded will be equally hard to find whether a predator is searching from on high or from underneath. Countershading and other forms of disruptive coloration can occur in the same organism so that dark spots, blotches, or stripes appear on top while paler ones appear below.
Another way of remaining undetected in a complex scene is by using protective mimicry, that is, to mimic an inanimate object in both color and form. Some insects look like thorns on plant stems; others look like leaves or twigs, or flowers. Phasmatodea, or bugs called by various names, including stick bugs, stick insects, or walking sticks, are excellent examples. Some insects, frogs, and fishes look like rocks, lichens, or corals. Sea lions, sea dragons, and even eels can look like floating kelp or other forms of seaweed.
Some animals may not look much like the objects around them but will disguise themselves by attaching pieces of plants or sand, or other debris to their body. Some caterpillars use silk to tie bits of flowers and leaves to their body; others use saliva as a glue. Some crabs glue broken bits of shell and coral to their own exoskeleton. By using bits of local materials to camouflage itself, an animal can ensure that it matches the background. It can even change its disguise as it moves from one area to another.
Being transparent is another way to match whatever background happens to be present. Many marine invertebrates, such as worms, jellyfish, and shrimp, are completely transparent. Complete transparency is less common among land animals, but some land invertebrates have transparent body parts, such as their wings, allowing them to break up the outline of their body and blend into whatever happens to be in the immediate background.
The Behavior and Ecology of Crypsis
Behavior is an important factor in the success or lack of success of any form of crypsis. For example, not even disruptive camouflage can hide something that is moving quickly with respect to its background. Because of this, predatory species that rely on speed or stamina to outrun, outswim, or outfly their prey generally have little use for camouflage. On the other hand, so-called sit-and-wait predators (such as boa constrictors or praying mantises) must be virtually perfectly camouflaged to remain undetected while their prey approach to within grabbing distance. In between are the stealth hunters that sneak up on their prey before making a final high-speed attack; such animals must be camouflaged and slow-moving when out of attack range but do not have to be camouflaged or slow when at close range.
As with predators, prey species that rely on rapid escape maneuvers do not often bother with camouflage coloration, while prey species that cannot rely on efficient escape tactics must, instead, rely on not being seen in the first place. Prey species that can move quickly but not as quickly as their predators must detect their predators before their predators detect them, and then they must remain absolutely still until the danger has passed.
Some species use different strategies as they go through different stages in life. In many altricial species (species with dependent young that require extended parental care of the offspring), the eggs or young are camouflaged, even though the adults are not; the temporary spots on deer fawns and mountain lion cubs are examples. In other species, nesting or brooding females may be camouflaged while the adult males retain their gaudy plumage or attention-getting behaviors; the changing seasonal patterns of color and behavior of ducks and songbirds provide examples here. Some species may be toxic and gaudy during one stage of life yet tasty and cryptic during another.
In an analysis of studies on animal camouflage tactics from 1900 to 2022, researchers investigated the effectiveness of background-matching camouflage techniques compared to masquerading strategies in which the animal disguises itself as a non-prey object, like a stick or leaf. Overall, masquerading was more effective than background-matching camouflage. However, when comparing background-matching camouflaged prey to animals that do not have camouflage abilities, background-matching prey took predators 60 percent longer to find than those without camouflage.
Finally, although camouflage is usually considered a visual phenomenon, crypsis is important in every sensory modality. If a prey animal is virtually invisible to its predators but puts out a sound, a scent, or a vibration that makes it easy to locate, visual crypsis alone would be useless. For successful protection, prey species must be cryptic in whatever sensory modalities their predators use for hunting. Likewise, for successful hunting, predatory species must be cryptic in whatever sensory modalities their prey use to detect danger. For most species of both predator and prey, this means being camouflaged or blending into the background in several sensory modalities all at once.
Principal Terms
Aposematism: use of bright, noncamouflaged colors as a warning signal to indicate toxicity or dangerousness
Countershading: a form of crypsis involving dark coloration on top and light coloration on the underside
Cryptic Coloration: any color pattern that blends into the background
Disruptive Coloration: use of stripes, spots, or blotches to break up the body outline and blend into a complex background
Protective Mimicry: use of both color and form to mimic an inanimate feature of the environment
Bibliography
Dettner, K., and C. Liepert. “Chemical Mimicry and Camouflage.” Annual Review of Entomology, vol. 39, 1994, pp. 129-54.
Ortolani, Alessia. “Spots, Stripes, Tail Tips, and Dark Eyes: Predicting the Function of Carnivore Colour Patterns Using the Comparative Method.” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 67, no. 4, Aug. 1999, pp. 433-76.
Owen, Denis. Camouflage and Mimicry. U of Chicago P, 1980.
Ramachandran, V. S., et al. “Rapid Adaptive Camouflage in Tropical Flounders.” Nature, vol. 379, no. 6568, 1996, pp. 815-18.
Sartore, Joel, and Niek Klaassen. “Stick Insects.” National Geographic, www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/invertebrates/facts/stick-insects. Accessed 29 June 2023.
Yirka, Bob. "Comparing Effectiveness of Camouflage in Different Animals." Phys.org, 14 Sept. 2022, phys.org/news/2022-09-effectiveness-camouflage-animals.html. Accessed 20 Sept. 2024.
Wicksten, Mary K. “Decorator Crabs.” Scientific American, vol. 242, no. 2, Feb. 1980, pp. 146-54.