Lola Montez
Lola Montez, born Elizabeth Rosana Gilbert in 1821, was a notable figure in 19th-century performing arts, recognized for her vibrant stage presence and tumultuous personal life. Her early years were marked by instability; after a childhood spent between India and England, she eloped with an army officer at sixteen but faced challenges that led to a brief marriage. Montez's career as a dancer began in 1842, and she quickly gained fame in Europe for her Spanish-themed performances, notably the cachucha dance. She became a controversial cultural icon, having numerous rumored affairs, including with influential figures like King Ludwig I of Bavaria.
Her time in America saw her shifting from dance to lecture tours, where she advocated for women's rights and shared her experiences, thus contributing to discussions on female emancipation. Montez was known for her assertive public persona, often engaging in confrontations that highlighted her fiery temperament. Her legacy includes not only her performances but also her role in early feminist discourse and media representation, making her a significant historical figure in both the arts and the fight for women's rights. She passed away in 1861, leaving behind a complex legacy intertwined with themes of empowerment and cultural identity.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Lola Montez
Irish-born dancer and actor
- Born: February 17, 1821
- Birthplace: Grange, County Sligo, Ireland
- Died: January 17, 1861
- Place of death: New York, New York
Montez was a dancer and actor who inspired the work of poets, playwrights, musicians, painters, kings, and politicians. She traveled extensively as a performer and was romantically linked to the king of Bavaria and famous writers and composers. Toward the end of her career, she turned away from scandalous stage antics to lecture on “female beauty,” recommending temperance, exercise, and cleanliness over cosmetics as safeguards of beauty.
Early Life
Lola Montez (MAHN-tehz) was born Elizabeth Rosana Gilbert. Her mother, Eliza Oliver, claimed to be a descendant of a Spanish family of high pedigree. She married Edward Gilbert, a British army officer of the Imperial Regiment in 1820. Most accounts paint a lonely picture of Elizabeth’s childhood, part of which she spent in India, where her father died in September, 1823. A year later, her mother married a man named Patrick Craigie.
In late 1826, when Elizabeth was not quite six years old, she was sent back to England, where she arrived the following year. She later wrote in her memoirs that she did not see her mother again until 1837, when her mother apparently tried to marry her off to an aging man. The sixteen-year-old Elizabeth instead eloped with an army officer named Thomas James. The couple later married legally on July 23, 1837, in Ireland. However, James’s commission to India in 1839 was the death knell for what was apparently a doomed union. Two years later, Elizabeth returned to London alone. By most accounts, she was by this time a particularly striking young woman. She had vivid blue eyes, ivory skin, ebony hair, and a curvaceous figure.
Life’s Work
The erratic stage career of Lola Montez began in 1842, after the fact that Elizabeth had had an adulterous affair with a man named George Lennox was discovered, and her husband petitioned for a legal separation. Elizabeth then reportedly studied under the gifted actor Fanny Kelly before taking up dance instruction in Spain. Her return to London as a “Spaniard” must have appeared authentic because she was engaged by the director of Her Majesty’s Theatre, Benjamin Lumley. Elizabeth danced the Spanish cachucha dance El Olano (also spelled El Oleano) for her debut on June 3, 1843, before the king of Hanover, Queen Adelaide, and the duchess of Kent. It was probably around this time that Elizabeth began calling herself Lola Montez, as Lumley billed her as “Donna Lola Montez of the Teatro Real, Seville.”

Lola’s specialty at that time was so-called “Andelusian” dances. The fact that she performed in both El Olano and La Sevillana at Covent Garden in July, 1843, suggests that her dancing skills were impressive, otherwise, she would not have gotten such engagements. European performances followed: the El Olano in Dresden, Germany, in early August, 1843; Le Bal de Don Juan at the Paris Opera on in March, 1844; and Der Verwunschene Prinz in Munich, Germany, in October, 1846. During this period, her rumored lovers included the Polish composer Franz Liszt; Alexandre Dujarier, a Parisian journalist; the French novelist Alexandre Dumas, père; and King Ludwig I of Bavaria.
Between late October, 1846, and early 1848, Lola’s acting career stalled as she played mistress to King Ludwig in Bavaria. Meanwhile J. S. Coyne’s farce Lola Montez: Or, Countess for an Hour was licensed by the Lord Chamberlain in London and debuted at the Haymarket Theatre on April 26, 1848. Curiously, Lola’s earlier, anonymously written piece, Lola Montez: Ou, La Countess d’une heure, was not licensed on the grounds that it pertained to a living monarch—King Ludwig. Coyne’s adaptation of her play was later reprised as Pas de Fascination; Or, The Catching of a Governor at the Haymarket Theatre on May 22, 1848.
In 1851, Lola returned to the stage after she reportedly married George Trafford Heald—who was apparently an officer in the Life Guards—on July 19, 1849. However, several weeks later, she was charged with bigamy. She jumped bail, fled London, and roamed through continental Europe before taking dance instruction from the noted Parisian ballet instructor Jardin Mabille. She returned to dancing in September.
Lola made her American debut at New York City’s Broadway Theatre in an original ballet called Betly the Tyrolean on December 29, 1851. After four performances there, she danced a pas d’Andalusia in the grand Spanish ballet Un Jour de carneval à Seville (carnival day in Seville) on January 5, 1852. Her career was boosted by numerous, well-publicized benefit nights, in which performers received most of the box-office proceeds, and a widely reported incident in which Lola evidently pummeled a man backstage in Boston in April.
Lola performed in C. P. T. Ware’s drama Lola Montez in Bavaria when it premiered in New York on May 25, 1852, and toured St. Louis and New Orleans afterward. Meanwhile, her publicity was supplemented by occasional stories about her physically assaulting men. For example, she boxed her dancing master George Smith about the ears in June, 1852, and assaulted the prompter of the Varieties Theatre New Orleans in April, 1853. Lola’s public sensations were coupled with her performances such as the spider dance, a saucier version of La tarentule, an Italian folk dance. The popular American actress Caroline Chapman later achieved an even greater success by performing her own version of the spider dance in San Francisco in June, 1853.
Lola began a tour of California goldfields after she met and married the editor of the San Francisco Whig Patrick Hurdy Hull on July 2, 1853. Rumors that she was seeking a divorce from Hull began to surface as early as October. In June, 1855, she sailed to Australia in the company of yet another lover, Noel Folland (sometimes spelled Follin). In August, she opened Lola Montez in Bavaria at Sydney’s Victoria Theatre. Her other staple pieces included The Follies of a Night by James Robinson Planche, Maidens Beware, Anthony and Cleopatra, and the comedy Morning Call. Into addition to her spider dance, which she presented in Australia in September, she performed the Neapolitan Sattirella, the El Olle, and a nautical hornpipe.
After separating from her theatrical company, Lola went to Melbourne. As in America, her feisty temper became a hallmark of her Australian tour. She publicly horsewhipped the editor of the Ballarat Times in February, 1856, and later accused him of slander. Soon afterward, she herself was so viciously attacked by the wife of her manager that she was unable to perform. When she sailed back to San Francisco in June, 1856, Folland mysteriously disappeared overboard.
After reaching the United States, Lola performed in San Francisco and New York but by August, 1857, her attentions were shifting from dancing to lecturing. In lecture tours through the United States and Canada, her topics included “Beautiful Women,” “Heroines and Strong-Minded Women of History,” “Gallantry,” “Comic Aspects of Fashion,” and “Slavery.” Her abrupt change of careers later inspired the Reverend Francis Lister Hawks’s tract Is Not This a Brand Plucked Out of the Fire? The Story of the Penitent: Lola Montez (1867).
Some researchers have suggested that syphilis, which Lola may have contracted from Alexandre Dumas, père, was the cause of her death in New York on January 17, 1861. She was appears to have been survived by a daughter named Elise who had been fathered by the French journalist Dujarier, with whom she had had an affair during the 1840’s.
Significance
The many enduring cross-cultural narratives that Lola Montez inspired lie at the heart of her significance. King Ludwig’s infamous decision to make her the “Countess of Lansfeld” in 1847 remains as compelling a part of her legacy as the nuggets of gold that prospectors are said to have thrown onto her stages during her Australian tour in 1855.
Just as Montez influenced others, she had her own influences. For example, her authentic costuming and use of iconic props were influenced by prima ballerinas such as Fanny Elssler and Maria Taglioni. Lola’s garter and mantilla became trademarks of her blatant sexuality, and the Spanish flavor of Elssler’s La tarentule was certainly the source for Lola’s spider dance. Lola’s advocacy of female emancipation in her lectures was probably encouraged by women such as the French writer George Sand and soprano Madame Rosina Stoltz.
More significant, perhaps, was Lola’s extraordinarily aggressive role in the construction of her own public persona. Years before the great French actor Sarah Bernhardt gained notoriety on and off the stage, Lola made herself famous with her stage antics and inflammable temper. The name “Lola Montez” became synonymous with the male “breeches” that she sometimes wore, the pungent cigars she smoked, and her involvement in controversial political issues, such as women’s rights.
Interestingly, Lola’s Australian tour coincided with a tour of the American lecturer Caroline H. Dexter, who spoke on the hazards of contemporary women’s attire and advocated wearing “bloomers.” Lola met Dexter during her voyage to Australia. Afterward, Dexter’s attention must have been drawn to Lola’s often critical press. In September, 1855, Dexter wrote to Bell’s Life in Sydney and Sporting Review to denounce the “unwholesome prejudice against the foully stigmatized and deeply injured Lola Montez.” The letters that both Dexter and Lola wrote to Australian newspapers are significant. They remain as rare examples of mid-nineteenth century women who succeeded in having their “political” views published under their own names. Because of this, both Dexter and Montez rank as remarkable figures in early Australian media history.
Bibliography
D’Auvergne, Edmund B. Lola Montez: An Adventuress of the Forties. London: T. W. Laurie, 1909. Despite its age, still a seminal source on Montez’s life.
Goldberg, Isaac. Queen of Hearts: The Passionate Pilgrimage of Lola Montez. New York: John Day, 1936. This book retains its merit as an important reference.
Hall, Humphrey, and Alfred John Cripps. The Romance of the Sydney Stage by Osric. Sydney: Currency Press, 1996. Includes information regarding Lola’s early life and gives details of her Australian tour.
Holdredge, Helen. Lola Montez. London: Alvin Redman, 1957. A meticulously researched source on Montez’s entire life.
Lola Montes: The Tragic Story of a Liberated Woman. Melbourne, Vic.: Heritage Publications, 1973. This anonymously published text extensively acknowledges the work of Goldberg, Holdredge, and D’Auvergne and pays particular attention to Montez’s tour of the Australian goldfields.
Seymour, Bruce. Lola Montez: A Life. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1996. Thorough and nearly definitive biography. Should be read in conjunction with John W. Frick’s review in Victorian Studies 40, no. 4 (Summer, 1997): 688-689.