Pontiac (tribal chief)

Chief

  • Born: c. 1720
  • Birthplace: Along Maumee River (now in northern Ohio)
  • Died: April 20, 1769
  • Place of death: Present-day Cahokia, Illinois

Category: Chief

Tribal affiliation: Ottawa

Significance: In 1763, in the wake of the French defeat during the French and Indian War, Pontiac envisioned a pan-Indian confederation to drive the British from Indian land

Pontiac was born in present-day northern Ohio, the son of an Ottawa father and a Chippewa (Ojibwa) mother. According to Ottawa custom, which allowed polygamy, presumably he married on several occasions, though only one wife, Kantuckeegan, and their two sons, Otussa and Shegenaba, have been identified. Pontiac, a large, imposing warrior, was esteemed for his strategic skills as well as for his intelligence and eloquence. By 1755, he had become an Ottawa war chief.

99110071-95123.jpg

The four colonial wars culminating in the French and Indian War (1754-1763) had pitted the French and their Indian allies against the British. Although the British had occasionally courted Indian alliance, Indians had disdained them, preferring the French, who practiced fair trade, provided lavish tribute, and established few permanent settlements on Indian land. The English scorned Indian culture, but the French were historically more tolerant, frequently marrying Indians and being welcomed into tribes.

The Ottawas, like most of their Great Lakes neighbors, were primarily fur traders who shared a congenial and mutually beneficial relationship with the French. During the French and Indian War, Pontiac fought with the French, helping to defeat General Edward Braddock and his British troops at Fort Duquesne (later Fort Pitt), modern-day Pittsburgh.

French defeat in 1763 proved disastrous for frontier Indian tribes, whose fate was suddenly thrust into British hands. Westward settlement was unimpeded with the removal of the French, and Indians faced new threats from migrating settlers. Furthermore, the British, through an unsympathetic commander-in-chief, Lord Jeffrey Amherst, alienated Indians by abandoning the French policy of bestowing gifts; Amherst viewed the practice as extravagant. The Indians, meantime, had grown dependent on European tools and weapons; French gunpowder had enabled them to supply vast quantities of fur as well as meat for their tribes. Indians faced genuine hardship when the British refused them supplies of gunpowder. In addition, Amherst, who during the war had fostered Indian addiction to alcohol, afterward prohibited its sale.

99110071-19612.jpg

In 1763, Pontiac, hoping to seize the initiative during the postwar confusion and possibly encouraged by promises of French aid, planned an offensive strike to drive the British from the frontier. In the meantime, another leader, known as the Delaware Prophet, was formulating his own plans for a unification of Indian tribes. Claiming to be the recipient of visions from the spirit world, the Prophet denounced European technology and alcohol and proposed a return to traditional Indian customs. Like Pontiac, the Prophet envisioned a pan-Indian alliance; unlike Pontiac, he was an advocate of peaceful methods.

On April 27, 1763, Pontiac convened a general war council during which he finalized his war plans. In a single massive assault, he intended to capture British forts ranging across the frontier. To that end, he delivered a general call to arms in the form of red wampum, to which several tribes responded, including the Chippewas (Ojibwas), Delawares, Hurons, Illinois, Kickapoos, Miamis, Mingoes, Potawatomis, Senecas, and Shawnees. On May 8, Pontiac and three hundred warriors entered Fort Detroit, concealing weapons and ready for an offensive strike. Realizing his plans had been revealed to the fort commander, Major Henry Gladwin, Pontiac withheld his battle signal. The next day, however, he and his men laid siege to the fort and continued it successfully for six months. During that time, nine other British forts were captured by Indians, and the British suffered more than two thousand casualties.

Fearing collapse of their frontier defense, the British mustered their strength and successfully counterattacked. By late 1763, the Indian resistance was weakening. Protracted warfare was inimical to Indians, who were accustomed to short strikes, and French support had failed to materialize. As the winter drew near, warriors became concerned about providing food, as the long disruption of their hunting and fishing threatened hardship for their families. Moreover, at Fort Pitt, soldiers under the command of Captain Simeon Ecuyer precipitated a devastating epidemic by distributing blankets infected with smallpox, a disease for which Indians had little resistance.

In late autumn, Pontiac ended his siege of Fort Detroit. Independent tribes remained hostile, however, engaging in battle throughout 1764. By July, 1765, Pontiac tentatively agreed to peace, formalizing his agreement in a treaty signed at Oswego in 1766 and thereby earning British pardon. Afterward he returned to his village along the Maumee River. His peace treaty angered many Indians, however, who were reluctant to end hostilities. Consequently, Pontiac, his family, and a small group of supporters were driven from their village.

In April, 1769, Pontiac traveled to a trading post at Cahokia, Illinois. There he was murdered by a Peoria Indian named Black Dog, whom the British may have paid to assassinate the great leader in an effort to curb future rebellions. Pontiac’s murder precipitated a war among the Indians, as several tribes united against the Illinois Indians to avenge his death.

Prior to the American Revolutionary War, Pontiac and his pan-Indian alliance provided the greatest native threat to British expansion in the New World. Several more Indian leaders over the coming century attempted rebellion, including Little Turtle in 1790-1794 and Tecumseh in 1809-1811, sustaining a tradition of Indian rebellions beginning in the early seventeenth century and lasting until the Battle of Wounded Knee in 1890.

Bibliography

Leach, Douglas E. Arms for Empire: A Military History of the British Colonies in North America, 1607-1763. New York: Macmillan, 1973.

‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗. “Colonial Indian Wars.” In History of Indian-White Relations, edited by Wilcomb E. Washburn. Vol. 4 in Handbook of North American Indians. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1988.

Parkham, Francis. The Conspiracy of Pontiac and the Indian War After the Conquest of Canada. 2 vols. 7th rev. ed. Boston: Little, Brown, 1874.

Peckham, Howard H. Pontiac and the Indian Uprising. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1947.

Sosin, Jack M. Whitehall and the Wilderness: The Middle West in British Colonial Policy, 1760-1775. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1961.