Job satisfaction
Job satisfaction refers to the degree of contentment an employee feels regarding their job, encompassing cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of organizational behavior. The understanding of job satisfaction has evolved from early management theories, such as Taylorism, to more contemporary views highlighted by the Hawthorne studies, which emphasized the relationship between working conditions and productivity. According to modern organizational theories, the emotional responses employees have toward their jobs, how they exhibit their satisfaction through actions, and their personal beliefs about the organization all play critical roles in determining overall job satisfaction. Various theories, including Edwin Locke's range of affect theory and dispositional theory, seek to explain the factors influencing job satisfaction and its impact on employee performance. Additionally, environmental and personal factors, such as communication and supervision, significantly affect job satisfaction levels. In recent years, trends like "the Great Resignation" have highlighted shifts in employee job satisfaction, particularly in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, revealing that issues like low wages and lack of respect have driven many to leave their positions. Understanding these dynamics can be crucial for organizations aiming to foster a more satisfied and productive workforce.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Job satisfaction
Job satisfaction is defined as the degree to which an employee is satisfied with his or her job. Management theorists and human resource professionals traditionally view job satisfaction as indicative of an employee’s willingness to perform at an optimum level of performance. Job satisfaction focuses on three components of organizational behavior: cognitive, affective, and behavioral and is widely used to determine overall satisfaction in human capital management.
Overview
Frederick Winslow Taylor’s theory of scientific management (also called Taylorism), which was developed in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, greatly influenced the concept of job satisfaction, with numerous researchers applying the principles of scientific management as a predictor of employee satisfaction. Human relations theorist George Elton Mayo’s work at Hawthorne Works in Chicago, however, further highlighted the effect of job satisfaction on employee motivation in the famous Hawthorne studies of the 1920s and 1930s. The Hawthorne studies gave rise to the phenomenon later known as the Hawthorne effect, in which working conditions were found to be correlated to worker productivity. Implications with regard to job satisfaction were not the focus of these studies but were examined by subsequent generations of researchers.
Under modern organizational theories, three domains directly impact the management of human capital. The affective domain considers the emotional response of workers toward their jobs, with primary emphasis on feelings and the relationship between the organization and the worker. Whether an employee feels valued by the organization determines his or her positive or negative affective perceptions of the organization. The behavioral domain determines how workers demonstrate individual levels of job satisfaction through their actions and performance. Employee behavior is closely associated with the affective dimensions of job satisfaction. The cognitive process involves individual theories, beliefs, and perceptions regarding an organization. If employees perceive an organization to be unfair, he or she will experience a high degree of cognitive dissonance resulting in a decrease in job performance. The cognitive domain receives the most attention from researchers due to its correlation with organizational efficacy. Elements of the cognitive domain directly impact an organization through employee perceptions of how well an organization induces the reward, task, authority, and social dynamics inherent in organizational health.
The field of organizational behavior includes numerous models of job satisfaction. Edwin Locke’s range of affect theory was first discussed in 1976 and remains the best known. The crux of the theory is that job satisfaction is a function of the difference between what a person wants in a job and what that person experiences in a job. Subsequent theorists identified dispositional theory, discrepancy theory, and motivator-hygiene theory, among others. The majority of theories utilized in researching job satisfaction seek to understand the degree to which employees are motivated and satisfied with their organization and the subsequent impact on employee performance. Dispositional theory suggests that no matter what type of job an individual has, there are unique certain dispositions affiliated with each individual. The type of organization and its relative system of rewards and benefits is inconsequential in determining job satisfaction. Irrespective of the theory employed to measure job satisfaction, however, numerous factors affect employee performance. Environmental and personal factors such as communication style, supervision, culture, personality, and educational level may impact employee job satisfaction.
In the 2020s, observers identified a phenomenon known as “the Great Resignation,” which was characterized by a significant number of people leaving their jobs following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. By 2021, these resignations had reached a record level among multiple demographics, leading many to attribute such resignations to plummeting job satisfaction following the pandemic. Indeed, by the following year, Pew Research Center reported that the leading causes among surveyed Americans who had left their job were low wages, limited opportunities for advancement, and feelings of being disrespected at work.
Bibliography
Aziri, B. “Job Satisfaction: A Literature Review.” Management Research and Practice 3.4 (2011): 77–86. Print.
Chugh, Abhinav. "What Is 'The Great Resignation'? An Expert Explains." World Economic Forum, 29 Nov. 2021, www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/11/what-is-the-great-resignation-and-what-can-we-learn-from-it/. Accessed 15 Aug. 2024.
Garg, P., and R. Rastogi. “New Model of Job Design: Motivating Employees’ Performance.” Journal of Management Development 25.6 (2006): 572–87. Print.
Goddard, Jules, and Tony Eccles. Uncommon Sense, Common Nonsense: Why Some Organizations Consistently Outperform Others. London: Profile, 2013. Print.
Furaker, Bengt, Kristina Hakansson, and Jan Karlsson, eds. Commitment to Work and Job Satisfaction: Studies with Work Orientations. New York: Routledge, 2012. Print.
Lencioni, Patrick. The Three Signs of a Miserable Job: A Fable for Managers (And Their Employees). San Francisco: Jossey, 2007. Print.
Parker, Kim, and Juliana Menasce Horowitz. "Majority of Workers Who Quit a Job in 2021 Cite Low Pay, No Opportunities for Advancement, Feeling Disrespected." Pew Research Center, 9 Mar. 2022, www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/03/09/majority-of-workers-who-quit-a-job-in-2021-cite-low-pay-no-opportunities-for-advancement-feeling-disrespected/. Accessed 15 Aug. 2024.
Spector, Paul E. Job Satisfaction: Application, Assessment, Causes, and Consequences. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2010. Print.
Thompson, E. R., and F. T. Phua. “A Brief Index of Affective Job Satisfaction.” Group and Organizational Management 37.3 (2012): 275–307. Print.
Westover, Jonathan H. Examining Job Satisfaction: Causes, Outcomes, and Comparative Differences. Champaign: Common Ground, 2011. Print.
Wood, Stephen, et al. “Enriched Job Design, High Involvement Management and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Roles of Job Satisfaction and Well-Being.” Human Relations 65.4 (2012): 419–45. Print.