Eagle Ford Shale
The Eagle Ford Shale (EFS) is a significant geological formation located in southern Texas, recognized for its rich hydrocarbon deposits. Spanning approximately 400 miles in length and 50 miles in width, it lies between 4,000 and 12,000 feet below the Earth's surface. The formation's potential was first tapped in 2008, leading to a surge in oil and natural gas drilling, which has made it the second most productive oil region in the United States as of 2024. With a daily production rate of 1.2 million barrels of oil and 7.4 billion cubic feet of gas, the EFS has had a substantial impact on both local and national economies.
However, the development of the EFS has sparked considerable debate. While it has brought economic prosperity to many small towns and increased employment in Texas, it has also raised environmental concerns, particularly regarding the practice of hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking." Critics have voiced worries about potential water contamination, increased truck traffic, and the overall impact on community life. Additionally, the region has experienced a rise in seismic activity, raising further concerns about the safety of fracking practices. As discussions around these issues continue, some Texas towns have begun to introduce bans on fracking, reflecting the complex balance between energy production and environmental protection.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Eagle Ford Shale
The Eagle Ford Shale (EFS) is a vast geological formation of shale rock that spans southern Texas from the Mexican border to the East Texas region and is known for its high hydrocarbon content. The formation measures about fifty miles wide and four hundred miles long, and is buried between four thousand and twelve thousand feet below Earth’s surface at most points. The first oil and natural gas wells tapping the formation were drilled in 2008, and since then the EFS has been extensively developed, with more than eight thousand oil and gas wells drilled by numerous companies. As of 2024, it was the second most productive oil region in the United States, with a rate of 1.2 million barrels pumped per day.
While the Eagle Ford oil boom brought prosperity to small towns in South Texas, it has also sparked controversy and environmental concerns. Debates over drilling in the region have mainly centered on the practice of hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking," in which rock is demolished with a high-pressure combination of water, sand, and chemicals in order to release greater amounts of hydrocarbons.
Brief History
Scientists believe that the EFS formation was created when Cretaceous period sediments containing carbon from an ancient forest were buried and compressed, forming a band of shale rock with a high carbonate content. The formation became known as energy producers mined associated deposits such as the Austin Chalk and the Edwards Limestone, but the resources of the EFS were not immediately recognized. The EFS is named after Eagle Ford, a town located roughly six miles west of Dallas, Texas, where the formation can be seen on the surface.
In 2008 the energy company Petrohawk first discovered the Eagle Ford Shale’s potential for drilling. The company’s initial well was a success and attracted numerous other oil and gas companies to the area. The Texas Railroad Commission, which regulates hydrocarbon exploration and production in Texas, saw an increase in drilling permits in the EFS from 26 in 2008 to more than 1,000 by 2013. The number of drilling permits continued to increase and had reached 1,213 by 2023. The number of operating gas leases had also significantly increased by 3,600 percent, and operating oil leases grew by about 6,300 percent over the same period.
As more companies tapped into the rich deposits, oil and gas production climbed correspondingly. According to the Texas Railroad Commission, the amount of natural gas extracted from the EFS grew from 2 million cubic feet per day in 2008 to 4,471 million in 2014. Oil production grew from 352 barrels per day in 2008 to 943,622 in 2014. During the first half of 2013, EFS produced 2.69 billion cubic feet of gas and 599,000 barrels of oil per day. By 2024, EFS was producing 7.4 billion cubic feet of gas and 1.16 million barrels of oil per day. Some of the major oil and gas companies that drilled on the EFS were Anadarko, ConocoPhillips, and Pioneer. According to Statista in August 2024, forty-two rigs were active in the EFS.
The EFS produces both wet and dry natural gas in addition to oil. The shale of the Eagle Ford formation is highly brittle due to its carbonate content, which makes the technique of hydraulic fracturing especially effective in extraction. The development of horizontal drilling and fracking methods also helped contribute to the ability to exploit the area’s mineral resources fully.
Eagle Ford Shale Today
The development of the EFS has had a major impact on Texas, the United States, and even the world energy market. The oil industry is one of the largest employers in Texas, helping the state recover from the 2008 recession and increase employment levels. By 2024, more than 470,000 people in Texas worked in the oil and natural gas industries. The booming industry has further benefited local economies by the influx of workers and money that support peripheral industries such as retail, trucking, restaurants, and hotels. The oil and gas of the EFS have also significantly contributed to a broader increase in US domestic energy production, helping drive down prices of gasoline and other fuels. This in turn has shaped the global oil market through reduced US demand and increased supply.
Not all the effects of the Eagle Ford oil and gas boom have been positive, however. Despite the general increase in prosperity, local residents have lodged numerous complaints over disruptions caused by the influx of industry into what were once mainly small towns. The heavy truck traffic required to transport barrels of oil and gas as well as the large amount of water required for fracking has caused controversy. The trucking industry itself has been strained to its limits to meet demand while developers attempt to improve infrastructure such as oil and gas pipelines. The population spike in some Texas communities has also been linked to an increase in crime, including theft, drug use, and prostitution.
The most controversial aspect of the development of the EFS is the prevalence of fracking and its potential environmental impact. Fracking uses large amounts of water mixed with sand and chemicals to fracture shale and release hydrocarbons, and its rising use has had a significant impact on water availability in water-stressed regions of the United States. Some Texas residents have opposed fracking because of factors such as noise pollution, vibrations, and spills that can reduce quality of life. Others oppose the distinction between property rights and mineral rights, and controversy has risen over the regulatory power of cities versus the state.
Many opposed to fracking also argue that the chemicals pumped into the rocks during the process might cause groundwater pollution. Several cases of well-water contamination suspected to be connected to nearby fracking operations have been reported in Texas, particularly involving the presence of methane gas. Critics of the technique state that the fracturing allows methane to run into groundwater supplies. According to Environment Texas in 2023, methane in the atmosphere traps about thirty to ninety times more heat than carbon dioxide and remains in the atmosphere for decades. A 2020 New York Times article indicated that pregnant women who lived near areas where flaring was common, such as the EFS, had a 50 percent greater chance of giving birth prematurely than those who did not.
In November 2013, the town of Reno, Texas, which sits on a formation similar to the EFS, experienced its first earthquake. Seismologists speculated that the tremors were caused by nearby disposal wells, where companies dump the millions of gallons of water used in fracking. According to Geoscience World in 2022, the regions in the EFS experienced 3,600 earthquakes from 2014 to 2021. While most earthquakes were small, some had a magnitude of 3.5. As of 2024, some Texas towns had either banned fracking or had begun taking the steps to do so.
Bibliography
Block, Melissa. "Drilling Frenzy Fuels Sudden Growth in Small Texas Town." All Things Considered. NPR, 10 Apr 2014. Web. 3 Dec. 2014.
Borenstein, Seth, "Contaminated Water Caused by Leaky Wells, Not Fracking Process, Study Says." Huff Post Green. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 15 Sept. 2014. Web. 4 Dec. 2014.
Darrah, Thomas H., et al. "Noble Gases Identify the Mechanisms of Fugitive Gas Contamination in Drinking-Water Wells Overlying the Marcellus and Barnett Shales." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111.39 (2014): 14076–81. Web. 11 Dec. 2014.
"Eagle Ford Shale Information." RRC. Railroad Commission of Texas, 9 Dec. 2014. Web. 11 Dec. 2014.
Gebrekidan, Selam. "Analysis: 100 Years after Boom, Shale Makes Texas Oil Hot Again." Reuters. Thomson Reuters, 3 May 2011. Web. 3 Dec. 2014.
Gottlieb, Zoe. "When Will the Eagle Ford Shale Run Dry?" San Antonio Journal, 9 May 2024, www.beg.utexas.edu/files/content/beg/ext-aff/2024/05%20May/When%20will%20the%20Eagle%20Ford%20Shale%20run%20dry.pdf. Accessed 25 Oct. 2024.
Krauss, Clifford. "A New American Oil Boom." New York Times. New York Times, 28 Aug. 2014. Web. 4 Dec. 2014.
Malewitz, Jim. "Fracking a ‘Nuisance,’ Denton Tells Court." Texas Tribune. Texas Tribune, 1 Dec. 2014. Web. 4 Dec. 2014.
McAllister, Edward. "October Oil Shale Permits Drop: Is the Slowdown Here?" Reuters. Thomson Reuters, 1 Dec. 2014. Web. 3 Dec. 2014.
Schmall, Emily. "Other Texas Towns Join Denton in Challenging Fracking." Dallas News Morning News. Dallas Morning News, 1 Dec. 2014. Web. 4 Dec. 2014.
"Total Energies Increases Texas Natural Gas Production with Eagle Ford Shale Acquisition from EOG Resources." World Oil, 8 Apr. 2024, worldoil.com/news/2024/4/8/totalenergies-increases-texas-natural-gas-production-with-eagle-ford-shale-acquisition-from-eog-resources/. Accessed 25 Oct. 2024.