Augmentative and alternative communication
Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) encompasses a variety of communication methods employed by individuals who are unable to rely on spoken language. This includes non-verbal approaches such as signing, body language, symbols, and writing, which are essential for expressing thoughts, needs, and ideas. AAC serves a diverse population, including those with congenital conditions like cerebral palsy and autism, as well as individuals facing acquired conditions such as traumatic brain injury and dementia. By facilitating communication, AAC enhances dignity, self-esteem, and independence among users.
Historically, forms of AAC have evolved from ancient practices to modern technological advancements. The field recognizes two primary categories: aided AAC, which involves external tools like communication boards and speech-generating devices, and unaided AAC, which relies on gestures and sign language. Advanced AAC devices can offer dynamic displays that allow users to access a wide range of vocabulary and conversational contexts, greatly enhancing their ability to engage in meaningful dialogue. As communication is recognized as a fundamental human right, AAC plays a crucial role in ensuring that all individuals, regardless of their abilities, can participate fully in social interactions.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Augmentative and alternative communication
According to the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) “includes all forms of communication (other than oral speech) that are used to express thoughts, needs, wants, and ideas.” This can include signing, body language, symbols, or writing for persons unable either to produce or to understand spoken communication. These persons usually have a congenital condition such as cerebral palsy, autism, or a cognitive or developmental disability or delay or have acquired a condition such as traumatic brain injury, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and dementia. AAC allows for these individuals the dignity, self-esteem, and increased independence that come with the ability to communicate. Physicist Stephen Hawking is probably the best-known user of AAC technology.

In 2005, AHSA included “comprehension” in its definition. The International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC) defines communication as “a basic human right, one essential to our quality of life of a social species.” This philosophy is enshrined in the United Nations’ Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Furthermore, according to the AAC Institute, “The two most important values expressed by people who rely on AAC are (1) saying exactly what they want to say and (2) saying it as fast as they can.”
Background
The earliest forms of alternative communication no doubt go back to prehistoric times. The first documented use of AAC is probably from Plato’s Cratylus, in which Socrates asks: “Suppose that we had no voice or tongue, and wanted to communicate with one another; should we not, like the deaf and dumb, make signs with the hands and head and the rest of the body?” Other forms of AAC existed in the classical world. For persons unable to communicate orally, the only option was a form of sign language. Manual alphabets date to the seventeenth century in Europe, and many American Indian nations had systems of “hand talk.” French sign language dates to 1771 and American Sign Language to 1817. The first widely available communication board was developed by F. Hall Roe, a man with cerebral palsy. In Europe and North America during the 1950s, AAC was increasingly accepted, funded, and used. In the 1960s, sign language gained widespread acceptance in the deaf community as a form of AAC. More recently, AAC has enabled an increasingly greater number of students with disabilities to better participate in mainstream settings.
AAC allows two or more people to communicate without the use of the spoken word. AAC can include such simple means as hand gestures or pointing at an object or picture, a sign language, or an advanced-technology computer-based communication tool. ISAAC cautions that when an advanced tool is used, the selection must be made on the basis of the needs and abilities of the person requiring AAC. Furthermore, though new systems are introduced frequently, it is important that a person’s existing AAC system should never be taken away; rather, the new system should be added to the person’s tools and any decision to retire an earlier system should be left to the individual.
Topic Today
AAC comprises two fundamental types: aided and unaided AAC. The former involves external equipment, ranging from simple nontechnical displays (e.g., pictures) to advanced computerized speech-generating devices. The latter includes facial expressions, lipreading, sign language, pointing, and other gestures. Speech-generating devices fall into two categories: fixed- and dynamic-display devices. Fixed-display devices, such as communication boards, are easier to use and a good tool to teach users more advanced systems. The drawback is that these devices use a set of fixed symbols, which limit communication options, including vocabulary and sentence construction.
Dynamic-display devices allow the user to gain access to multiple categories of subjects and contexts, along with the ability to produce authentic conversation. (DynaVox is a well-known and pioneering maker of such devices.) The user can use a pointer, joystick, keyboard, or touch-screen technology to construct messages. These machines also include digitized and synthesized speech to translate user input into verbal output. Whatever the type of AAC used, persons with a variety of conditions and disabilities have the gift—and right—to communicate with other people.
Bibliography
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. “Roles and Responsibilities of Speech-Language Pathologists with Respect to Alternative Communication: Position Statement.” ASHA Supplement 25 (2005): 1–2. Print.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. “Roles and Responsibilities of Speech-Language Pathologists with Respect to Alternative Communication: Technical Report.” ASHA Supplement 24 (2004): 1–17. Print.
Apel, Kenn, and Julie Masterson. Beyond Baby Talk. 2nd ed. New York: Three Rivers, 2012. Print.
Beukelman, David, et al. Alternative and Augmentative Communication: Supporting Children and Adults with Complex Communication Needs. 4th ed. Baltimore: Brookes, 2013. Print.
"Beyond Spoken Words: Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)." Healthy Children, American Academy of Pediatrics, 11 Oct. 2023, www.healthychildren.org/English/health-issues/conditions/developmental-disabilities/Pages/augmentative-and-alternative-communication-for-children.aspx. Accessed 12 Feb. 2025.
Hamm, Bruce, and Pat Mirenda. “Post-School Quality of Life for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities Who Use AAC.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 22.2 (2006): 134–47. Print.
Lloyd, Lyle L., Donald R. Fuller, and Helen H. Arvidson. Augmentative and Alternative Communication: A Handbook of Practices and Principles. Boston: Allyn, 1997. Print.
Loncke, Filip. Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Models and Applications for Educators, Speech-Language Pathologists, Caregivers, and Users. San Diego: Plural, 2014. Print.
McNaughton, David, and David Beukelman, eds. Transition Strategies for Adolescents and Young Adults Who Use AAC (Augmentative and Alternative Communication). Baltimore: Brookes, 2010. Print.
Vanderheiden, Gregg. “A Journey through Early Augmentative Communication and Computer Access.” Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 39.6 (2002): 53. Web. 18 Feb. 2014.
Wendt, Oliver, et al. “Assistive Technology: Principles and Applications for Communication Disorders and Special Education.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication Perspectives. Bingley: Emerald, 2011. Print.
Yau, Shu H. "Comparing and Contrasting Barriers in Augmentative Alternative Communication Use in Nonspeaking Autism and Complex Communication Needs: Multi-Stakeholder Perspectives." Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 15, 10 June 2024, doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1385947. Accessed 12 Feb. 2025.