Web 1.0

Web 1.0 refers to the early stage of the World Wide Web (web or WWW). A true definition of Web 1.0 is dependent on the definition of Web 2.0. Web 2.0was coined by Dale Dougherty of O'Reilly Media, who simply wished to use the term as the name for an Internet conference—the Web 2.0 Conference. However, the term stuck, and people began attempting to define it. After Tim O'Reilly, the founder of O'Reilly Media, offered a lengthy definition of Web 2.0, there was a general consensus regarding its meaning. That consensus was that Web 2.0 refers to advancements on the Internet that allow people to connect through interactive technology. The use of 2.0 in the term made people think that there must also be a Web 1.0. This reasoning eventually led to the understanding that Web 1.0 refers to everything on the Internet that came before Web 2.0. Furthermore, Web 1.0 describes the web prior to the existence of social networking sites, blogs, wikis, and web-based applications. While some sites today are still based on the Web 1.0 approach, experts generally regard the Web 2.0 approach as more effective.

100259331-94033.jpg

Web 1.0 Basics

Web 1.0 refers to the Internet prior to its evolution. A specific timeframe for this advancement cannot be pinpointed. The web slowly evolved into a more interactive system over time due to the growth in popularity of social networking sites, such as MySpace and Facebook, and other platforms, such as YouTube and Twitter. Technological advancements—including broadband Internet, improved browsers, and the development of widgets—also contributed to the web's evolution. Broadband is a type of high-speed data transmission that enables faster Internet access. A browser is an application that finds and displays web content. Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox are examples of web browsers. A widget is a computer element such as an icon, button, selection box, or pull-down menu that displays information and/or responds to a user's actions. These technological advancements helped usher in the age of Web 2.0.

Key Features of Web 1.0

According to O'Reilly, Web 1.0 has several features that separate it from Web 2.0. One of the main features of the Web 1.0 approach is that the websites are static, meaning they do not change. While these sites may include useful information, they do not typically give visitors a reason to return to the site. Conversely, Web 2.0 websites do change and encourage visitors to come back. For example, a Web 1.0 site might provide valuable information about a charitable organization, but that information is never updated. In contrast, a Web 2.0 site might include a frequently updated blog that informs visitors about the organization's latest initiatives.

Another feature of Web 1.0 sites is that they are not interactive. A Web 1.0 site does not permit visitors to alter or contribute to the site in any way. An example of such a site is an informational site about a company. On the other hand, a Web 2.0 site allows visitors to make alterations and contributions, as is the case with Wikipedia.

Web 1.0 sites also have applications that are proprietary, which means that only the owner of the application can modify it or create new applications based on it. For instance, a browser from Web 1.0 does not permit users to make modifications, whereas a browser from Web 2.0 allows users to build new applications from it.

Relevance of Web 1.0 Today

Although the Web 2.0 approach is considered more effective than the Web 1.0 approach, the Web 1.0 approach is still used today. Certain webpages might require the use of the Web 1.0 approach. One example might be the official website for an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia entries should be factual and objective. If an official encyclopedia site were based on the Web 2.0 approach, anyone with Internet access would be able to edit the entries. Unfortunately, this might make the entries more prone to inaccuracy and personal bias. Therefore, a Web 1.0 approach would be a better choice for such a site. Wikipedia, which is an informational site but not an official encyclopedia site, provides a good example of the risks involved with the Web 2.0 approach. Visitors to Wikipedia can contribute to and edit articles on the site. However, the site's interactive nature means that people can add inaccurate facts, misleading information, or even their own opinions to articles, which compromises the accuracy and objectivity of the information on the site.

A website for a restaurant that is strictly informational is another example where the Web 1.0 approach would work better than the Web 2.0 approach. If a restaurant owner wishes to create a site that just provides basic information, such as menu items and hours of operation, then a Web 1.0 approach would be ideal. An interactive Web 2.0 approach may give patrons the opportunity to post negative reviews on the site, which could deter others from dining at the restaurant.

Bibliography

"Definition of: Web 1.0." PCMag, http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/57650/web-1-0. Accessed 31 Oct. 2016.

Strickland, Jonathan. "Is There a Web 1.0?" HowStuffWorks, 28 Jan. 2008. http://computer.howstuffworks.com/web-10.htm. Accessed 31 Oct. 2016.

"Web 1.0." Techopedia, http://www.techopedia.com/definition/27960/web-10. Accessed 31 Oct. 2016.