Egalitarian symbiosis
Egalitarian symbiosis refers to a social state where individuals of diverse races, religions, and ethnic backgrounds coexist peacefully, sharing equal rights and contributing to the well-being of one another. This concept emphasizes mutual benefit and cooperation in various aspects of life, such as social, political, and economic arenas. While the United States is often viewed as a notable example of racial and ethnic integration, it has also faced significant challenges, including resistance to inclusivity and the need for civil rights legislation to address ongoing conflicts. The civil rights movement of the 1960s marked a critical period that spurred advocacy for multiculturalism, allowing diverse groups to live in harmony while preserving their unique cultural identities. Despite existing issues of prejudice and discrimination, many individuals from varied backgrounds strive towards achieving egalitarian symbiosis. This concept has drawn interest from social scientists and philosophers throughout history, highlighting its relevance to discussions of justice and rights in contemporary society. Overall, egalitarian symbiosis remains a significant framework for understanding the dynamics of diversity and coexistence in modern communities.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Egalitarian symbiosis
When people of different races, religions, and ethnic origins peacefully coexist, sharing equally in the social, political, and economic rights of their society and contributing to the mutual benefit of all, the relationship is referred to as egalitarian symbiosis. Although the United States is perceived by many people as a successful experiment in racial and ethnic mixing, resistance to the efforts of people of different races, religions, and ethnic backgrounds to participate fully in the society has sometimes been pronounced and long-lasting, requiring the passage of minority and civil rights laws in order to avoid racial and ethnic conflict. Since the civil rights movement of the 1960s, many Americans have advocated a policy of multiculturalism, in which people of diverse ethnic origins live together in unity and still maintain their own cultures. Although problems involving prejudice and discrimination continue to be prevalent in the United States, people from a diverse mixture of racial and ethnic backgrounds generally live together in harmony, working toward a state of egalitarian symbiosis.
Egalitarian symbiosis in society has been studied by many prominent social scientists, including John Locke, John Rawls, Karl Marx, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, as well as the ancient philosophers Aristotle and Plato. These scientists' egalitarian research closely mirrors the concept of distributive justice and has modern applications for civil rights, as well as human rights and gender rights.
![Signs from the Occupy Boston demonstration. By Twp [CC-BY-SA-3.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons 96397305-96236.jpg](https://imageserver.ebscohost.com/img/embimages/ers/sp/embedded/96397305-96236.jpg?ephost1=dGJyMNHX8kSepq84xNvgOLCmsE2epq5Srqa4SK6WxWXS)
Bibliography
Boulden, Jane, and Will Kymlicka. International Approaches to Governing Ethnic Diversity. Oxford UP, 2015.
Eller, Jack David. Culture and Diversity in the United States: So Many Ways to Be American. Routledge, 2015.
Hanser, Robert D., and Michael Gomila. Multiculturalism and the Criminal Justice System. Pearson, 2015.
Renzetti, Claire M., and Raquel Kennedy Bergen. Understanding Diversity: Celebrating Difference, Challenging Inequality. Pearson, 2015.
Salett, Elizabeth Pathy, and Diane R. Koslow. Multicultural Perspectives on Race, Ethnicity, and Identity. Natl. Assn. of Social Workers, 2015.
Tomlin, Patrick. “What Is the Point of Egalitarian Social Relationships?” Distributive Justice and Access to Advantage: G. A. Cohen’s Egalitarianism, edited by Alexander Kaufman, Cambridge UP, 2014, pp. 151–79.
Waldrop, Rachael J., and Meg A. Warren. “Exploring Egalitarianism: A Conceptual and Methodological Review of Egalitarianism and Impacts on Positive Intergroup Relations.” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 14, no. 9, 2024, p. 842, doi.org/10.3390/bs14090842. Accessed 2 Dec. 2024.