Organizational Effectiveness
Organizational effectiveness refers to how well an organization achieves its goals and objectives while optimizing resources such as time, money, and personnel. A key aspect of effectiveness is the balance between minimizing costs and maximizing gains, which can include various outcomes beyond mere financial profit. The concept has deep historical roots, tracing back to ancient military strategies and evolving significantly during the Industrial Revolution with the introduction of assembly lines that enhanced productivity.
In the contemporary context, organizational effectiveness is understood through both academic and practical lenses. Academically, it involves studies aimed at developing theories to enhance effectiveness by focusing on factors such as adaptation to constraints, group inertia, and the selection of appropriate strategies. Practically, it emphasizes real-world applications that drive profitability and efficiency, often through careful employee selection and empowerment. Overall, effective organizations are characterized by their ability to adapt to changing environments and constraints, thus ensuring sustained performance and competitive advantage.
Organizational Effectiveness
Organizational effectiveness is how effective an organization is. An organization is a group of individuals who join together to achieve a mutual goal. Effectiveness is how well a group achieves its goals. Effectiveness is typically measured by having minimal costs and maximum gain. When discussing effectiveness, costs and gains can be a wide range of variables, including time, money, personnel, or other resources. The history of organizational effectiveness is closely tied to the history and sociology of groups and businesses.
![Flow chart of McDonald's corporate organization. By Emilymistick (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons 109057108-111313.jpg](https://imageserver.ebscohost.com/img/embimages/ers/sp/embedded/109057108-111313.jpg?ephost1=dGJyMNHX8kSepq84xNvgOLCmsE2epq5Srqa4SK6WxWXS)
![Systems Model of Action-Research Process for organization improvement. By Prokopenya Viktor [CC BY-SA 3.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0) or GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html)], via Wikimedia Commons 109057108-111312.jpg](https://imageserver.ebscohost.com/img/embimages/ers/sp/embedded/109057108-111312.jpg?ephost1=dGJyMNHX8kSepq84xNvgOLCmsE2epq5Srqa4SK6WxWXS)
Background
The background and history of organizational effectiveness are tied to the development of groups. The origins can be found in the ancient Greek and ancient Roman militaries. The next major milestone in organizational effectiveness is seen with the development of the production line and assembly line, used by the Italians. The Industrial Revolution, beginning in the eighteenth century, saw the next advancement. The incorporation of organizational effectiveness into business coincides with the birth of sociology and the study of business as an academic discipline in the middle of the nineteenth century.
The origins of organizational effectiveness are found in the militaries of Rome and Greece. The armies modified typical tactics as they changed opponents. Realizing that the same maneuvers do not work against all enemies, these two armies would change their tactics to suit their foes, managing to consistently win. This methodology exemplifies the notion that effectiveness changes as the challenge changes.
The Italians of Venice were renowned as shipbuilders. The construction of the Venetian Arsenal began in 1104. The Venetians used the assembly line and production line process in order to speed up production, increasing both efficiency and effectiveness. The production line and assembly line would be seen at a later point in time, during the Industrial Revolution and in conjunction with the production of the Model T Ford. It is unknown why other cultures and organizations did not adopt the use of the production line and assembly line, as it was the primary reason the Venetian Arsenal was able to produce the quality and quantity of ships it did. At its peak, the Venetian Arsenal was producing a completed ship on a daily basis.
The Industrial Revolution was the next major milestone for organizational effectiveness. The Industrial Revolution, starting in the mid-eighteenth century, saw the introduction and increasing use of machines to mass produce goods and materials that individual workers had previously crafted by hand. In this case, organizational effectiveness is not allocated to or the result of any one group or individual but a collective effort on behalf of all aspects of industry and commerce in order to reduce costs and improve profits.
The movement of organizational effectiveness in the business and academic realms started near the end of the Industrial Revolution and became mainstream by the turn of the twentieth century. Academics began experiments and studies in order to analyze, improve, and increase organizational effectiveness, primarily in commercial and industrial ventures. It also applied, to a lesser degree, to academia and the service-oriented sector as well.
Organizational Effectiveness Today
In the twenty-first century, organizational effectiveness is divided between two realms, the academic and the practical. The academic version of organizational effectiveness is driven by experiments and studies, with the end state of determining a more cohesive and well-defined theory of how to improve an organization’s effectiveness. The practical version of organizational effectiveness is driven by increasing a venture’s profits while at the same time reducing costs in both time and money.
Theoretical applications of organizational effectiveness focus on adaption, inertia, selection, and constraints, as well as cost and profit. Adaption entails that an organization will adapt to its limitations in order to overcome them. Effective organizations are able to adapt and thrive within these limitations, while the less effective groups cannot. The result is that groups that cannot adapt to the limitations imposed upon them will not succeed and often fail to realize a profit. Inertia entails the willingness of a group to adapt. Inherent within inertia are the motivations and traditions of a group. A group with strong, immobile, unchanging traditions will be less effective than a group that is malleable and willing to change its environment.
Another factor within the inertia realm is the knowledge base of the group members. If the members are not willing to learn new tactics and techniques as time goes by, or if they are not willing to learn new technologies, the growth in productivity of the group will slow, leading to an ineffective group. Selection entails that the group that is best able to adapt to its limitations will be best suited for effective work. To maximize the potential for selection, a group must allow for and promote traits that permit the group the freedom to adapt and overcome challenges and limitations. Constraints are the limitations that a group faces. These constraints may be legal, moral, or capability-based. These constraints force the group to forgo options that may be viewed as acceptable to the group.
The last elements that the academic and theoretical models consider are cost and profit. Costs and profits can be monetary, time-based, or both. The overall goal is to minimize costs, while at the same time increasing profits. The groups that are effective manage to meet both milestones.
The practical version of organizational effectiveness is much less detailed than the academic model. The practical version is concerned with what works in the real world, not in the academic world. Many of the Forbes 100 and Fortune 500 companies have found techniques that maximize organizational effectiveness. The primary way this is done is the proper selection of employees, those who are highly qualified, such that they can adapt to the challenges, and are empowered by their employer to do so. Without the ability to effect any change, there can be no improvement to the organization.
Bibliography
Bass, Bernard, and Bruce Avolio, editors. Improving Organizational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership. SAGE, 1993.
Cherrington, David. Organizational Effectiveness. Brigham Young University Press, 2003.
Chidambaranathan, Kumaresan, and Swarooprani B. S. "Knowledge Management as a Predictor of Organizational Effectiveness: The Role of Demographic and Employment Factors." Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 41, no. 6, 2015, pp. 758–63. ScienceDirect, doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.08.015. Accessed 5 Feb. 2025.
Doshi, Neel, and Lindsay McGregor. Primed to Perform: How to Build the Highest Performing Cultures Through the Science of Total Motivation. Harper Business, 2015.
Galford, Robert M., et al. Simple Sabotage: A Modern Field Manual for Detecting and Rooting Out Everyday Behaviors That Undermine Your Workplace. HarperOne, 2015.
Lawler, Edward W., and Chris Worley. Built to Change: How to Achieve Sustained Organizational Effectiveness. Wiley, 2006.
Levenson, Alec. "Strategic Analytics: Advancing Strategy Execution and Organizational Effectiveness." Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2015.
Maloney, Devon. “Organizational Effectiveness: The X Factor for Company Success.” Slack, 17 June 2019, slack.com/blog/transformation/organizational-effectiveness-company-success. Accessed 5 Feb. 2025.
Martin, Karen, and Mike Osterling. Value Stream Mapping: How to Visualize Work and Align Leadership for Organizational Transformation. McGraw Hill, 2013.