Adventure education
Adventure education is a dynamic form of experiential learning that encourages participants to engage in perceived-risk activities, promoting both interpersonal and intrapersonal skill development. The underlying philosophy posits that personal transformation can occur through direct experiences and guided risk-taking, revealing latent qualities within individuals. This approach is particularly beneficial for diverse groups, including at-risk youth and cancer survivors, by fostering self-discovery through challenging situations.
In addition to personal growth, adventure education is often utilized in team-building contexts for communities and corporations, enhancing leadership and communication skills among participants. The effectiveness of adventure education is influenced by several key factors, including the characteristics of the participant, the group dynamics, the expertise of the instructor, the nature of the activities, the physical environment, and the participant's ability to process their experiences.
Smaller group sizes tend to yield better outcomes, as they facilitate interdependence and personal growth. Moreover, the unfamiliarity of the physical environment is crucial, as it encourages reflection and can induce mild anxiety, both of which are integral to the learning process. Ultimately, processing the experiences, whether individually or in a group setting, allows participants to derive meaning and apply insights to their lives, making adventure education a unique and impactful educational approach.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Adventure education
Adventure education is a form of experiential education in which participants engage in perceived-risk activities in order to develop interpersonal and intrapersonal skills. The theory behind adventure education is based on the belief that through direct experience and guided risk-taking, a participant is able to bring about personal change through the discovery and use of previously dormant or unrecognized qualities. These inner qualities are exposed and then drawn on through diverse challenges, activities, and experiences.
Overview
One of the aims of adventure education is to engage in potentially uncomfortable situations in order to foster self-discovery. Adventure education has been used with young, at-risk adults as well as to encourage and strengthen the lives of cancer survivors. Additionally, adventure educators often lead community and corporate team-building activities to improve leadership and communication skills and cultivate relationships among participants.
It is difficult to measure specific goals or desired outcomes of adventure education. Nevertheless, researchers and theorists tend to agree on six variables that determine the effectiveness of an adventure education experience: the participant, the group, the instructor or facilitator, the activities in which a participant engages, the tangible or physical environment of the activities, and the degree to which the participant processes the experience.
Participants’ prior experiences and existing knowledge are important considerations in planning activities so they are challenging and instructional. Gender, age, and socioeconomic status can affect whether a participant has prior knowledge of an activity, how the participant responds to an activity, and whether an activity’s desired outcome can be achieved.
The size of a participant’s group influences the outcome of an activity. Smaller groups of seven to fifteen members have been shown to be more beneficial than larger groups, and developing a sense of interdependence among group members is believed to help develop individual growth.
Several characteristics contribute to instructor effectiveness in leading an adventure education activity. An instructor’s personal history, personality, and level of interpersonal interactions with group members are believed to contribute to the overall effectiveness of an adventure educator.
Research has shown that inner growth is achieved when internal discord and anxiety are mastered and overcome through being involved in personal challenges and experiences. Consequently, activities that do not provide a state of conflict or uneasiness for the participant tend to produce less-than-desired results. Similarly, adventure education theorists agree that the physical environment must be unfamiliar and foreign to the participant, which allows individuals to reflect more easily on their current and familiar life situations. An unknown environment will also provoke mild anxiety, which is an important facet of adventure education.
Processing the adventure experience allows participants to understand and adopt meaning from an event. Processing can occur privately after the experience has concluded or with the group and led by the instructor, or an activity can be designed in a way that connections are easily drawn between the activity and the participant’s life.
Bibliography
Bell, Brent J. “Assessing the Effectiveness of an Adventure-Based First-Year Experience Class.” Journal of College Student Development 53.2 (2012): 347–55. Print.
Collins, Loel, and Dave Collins. “Decision Making and Risk Management in Adventure Sports Coaching.” Quest 65.1 (2013): 72–82. Print.
Hutson, Garrett. "Outdoor Adventure Education as a Platform for Developing Environmental Leadership." People and Nature, British Ecological Society, vol. 6, no. 5, 28 July 2024, pp. 1974-1986, doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10699. Accessed 12 Feb. 2025.
Lee, KoFan, and Alan Ewert. “Adventure Programs and Diverse Family Styles.” Journal of Experiential Education 36.2 (2013): 123–38. Print.
McKenzie, Marcia D. “How Are Adventure Education Program Outcomes Achieved?: A Review of the Literature.” Australian Journal of Outdoor Education 5.1 (2000): 19–28. Print.
Neill, James T., and Katica L. Dias. “Adventure Education and Resilience: The Double-Edged Sword.” Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning 1.2 (2001): 35–42. Print.
Pryor, Anita, et al. “Outdoor Education and Bush Adventure Therapy: A Social-Ecological Approach to Health and Wellbeing.” Australian Journal of Outdoor Education 9.1 (2005): 3–13. Print.
Shooter, Wynn, and Nate Furman. “Through Adventure Education: Using a Socio-ecological Model in Adventure Education to Address Environmental Problems.” The Socioecological Educator: A 21st Century Renewal of Physical, Health, Environment and Outdoor Education. Ed. Brian Wattchow, et al. New York: Springer, 2013. 139–52. Print.
Stremba, Bob, and Christian A. Bisson. Teaching Adventure Education Theory: Best Practices. Champaign: Human Kinetics, 2009. Print
Tucker, Anita R., at al. “The Use of Adventure Therapy in Community-Based Mental Health: Decreases in Problem Severity among Youth Clients.” Child & Youth Care Forum42.2 (2013): 155–79. Print.
Veevers, Nick, and Pete Allison. Kurt Hahn: Inspirational, Visionary, Outdoor and Experiential Educator. Boston: Sense, 2011. Print.