Oil Pipelines in Canada
Oil pipelines in Canada are a critical topic due to the country's vast oil reserves, particularly in regions like Alberta. Transporting this oil to accessible shipping ports is a complex and costly endeavor, often requiring pipelines that span hundreds of miles. The debate surrounding pipeline construction is multifaceted, involving economic benefits and environmental concerns. While proponents argue that pipelines can be designed to minimize spills and bolster the economy, environmentalists express significant apprehension about potential ecological damage.
The Keystone XL pipeline, proposed in 2008, exemplifies the contentious nature of these projects, facing various political and environmental challenges throughout its proposal history. Other notable projects include the Trans Mountain expansion, which seeks to transport oil to the Pacific, and the Energy East pipeline, which was ultimately abandoned. Indigenous peoples, or First Nations, play a crucial role in these discussions, as their connection to the land influences their perspectives on pipeline projects. While some support the economic opportunities pipelines might bring, others oppose them due to environmental concerns and the potential infringement upon their sacred lands. Navigating these diverse opinions and legislative requirements has created a challenging landscape for pipeline development in Canada.
On this Page
Oil Pipelines in Canada
Oil pipelines are a subject of great interest to the nation of Canada. This is because the country has huge oil deposits located in its central regions, but due to its vast size, transporting the oil to ocean ports where it can be loaded onto tanker ships for sale all over the world is an enormous undertaking in terms of labor and expense. Numerous attempts have been made at constructing pipelines, but these would have to be hundreds of miles long in order to reach shipping ports. Complicating the issue still further, efforts at constructing pipelines have long been opposed by environmental groups concerned about the possibility—some would say inevitability—of oil spills. Proponents of the pipelines contend that the pipelines can be designed to prevent spills and contain them if they do occur, and that the pipelines would be a huge benefit to Canada’s economy and to the world's oil output.
Brief History
The focus of efforts to construct an oil pipeline was directed southward, as the oil industry pushed for the approval of the Keystone XL pipeline, which was proposed in 2008. This pipeline, if constructed, would extend from Canada’s province of Alberta southward, through the province of Saskatchewan. From there it would cross the border with the United States and pass through several states. One version of the plan would have the pipeline run through Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas, finally reaching Houston. From there, the oil carried by the pipeline could be loaded onto tankers in the Gulf of Mexico and shipped to any location in the world. An alternate proposal for the Keystone XL pipeline would run from Alberta through Saskatchewan to Manitoba, and then turn south to pass through North Dakota before following the same course as the first proposal. The Keystone pipeline proposals were the subject of fierce debate in the United States, pitting oil companies against environmentalists. The request to construct the pipeline across the United States was rejected by President Barack Obama late in 2015, revived by President Donald Trump in 2017, and canceled by President Joe Biden in 2021.
The initial rejection of the Keystone pipeline caused Canada to reconsider proposals for reaching the ocean in other directions. The Trans Mountain pipeline expansion was proposed in 2013. It created an additional line from Alberta to British Columbia so that oil could be loaded onto tankers in the Pacific Ocean. The project was approved by the Canadian government in 2016 and began operating in 2024. The Northern Gateway pipeline proposal, which was rejected by Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in 2016, would have seen oil moved from Alberta to British Columbia also, but along a different route than that used by the Trans Mountain pipeline. Looking eastward, the Energy East pipeline would have run from Alberta east to Ontario so that it could be shipped from Quebec and New Brunswick out to the Atlantic Ocean, but the project was abandoned in 2017. Finally, the MacKenzie Valley pipeline project, proposed in 2004, would have run from Alberta north to the Arctic Ocean. The project was approved by the National Energy Board in 2011 but was later canceled in 2017.
Overview
The pipeline proposals still being pursued face other obstacles in addition to the objections of environmentalists. One obstacle is related to Canada’s climate. Virtually the entire country suffers harsh winters every year, so this makes the construction of a reliable pipeline over hundreds of miles of undeveloped countryside extremely difficult. These difficulties were multiplied for the MacKenzie Valley proposal, because the winter weather becomes more extreme as one moves north toward the Arctic Circle.
Much of Canada’s land is occupied by Canada’s Indigenous peoples, known as the First Nations. Because the culture of Indigenous tribes is deeply connected to the land and the preservation of it, the prospect of constructing a pipeline threatens to violate what they see as their sacred bond with the natural world, due to the pipeline’s potential for damaging the environment if an oil spill should occur. At the same time, many among the First Nations support the pipeline proposals because of their potential for bringing jobs and economic development to rural areas that otherwise struggle with poverty and isolation. This situation makes for a challenging political struggle, for although the First Nations groups opposing the pipelines tend to lack the financial resources and political connections enjoyed by the oil companies supporting the pipelines, First Nations peoples are a rapidly growing demographic in Canada, which means that political figures realize that they need to pay attention to the First Nations worldview.
Canadian laws require that Indigenous groups must be consulted before land development projects—such as pipeline construction—can move forward, so that their rights and interests can be considered and accommodated. Still, the preferences of First Nations tribes can be overruled by courts if the court can be persuaded that developers did their best to listen to the tribes’ concerns and satisfy them. While Canada has almost two hundred different First Nations, not all have treaties with the government. In most cases, the decisions about how land is to be used are made by the government of the province where the land is located.
The position of some First Nations without treaties improved in 2015, when they were for the first time granted rights over some portions of their traditional lands by the Canadian court system. In 2022, the Framework Agreement on First Nations Land Management Act came into force to repeal an earlier law. This legislation ordered the development of a land registry that would be owned, managed, and administered by First Nations. Such treaties and legislation gave these tribes much greater authority over how the land is used and made the bargaining position of oil companies more difficult. Some First Nations completely rejected any pipeline projects on their land, while others considered such projects but required adequate assurances of safety and significant levels of compensation.
Bibliography
Appel, Hannah, Arthur Mason, Michael Watts, and Matthew T. Huber. Subterranean Estates: Life Worlds of Oil and Gas. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2015. Print.
Ball, David P. "Enbridge Northern Gateway Hits a Hurdle with Referendum Loss." Windspeaker 32.2 (2014): 7. Academic Search Complete. Web. 11 Jan. 2016.
Black, Toban, et al. A Line in the Tar Sands: Struggles for Environmental Justice. Oakland, CA : PM Press, 2014. Print.
Carlson, Travis J. and Sharon Harper. Canadian Oil Sands, Greenhouse Gases, and the Keystone Xl Pipeline. New York: Novinka, 2012. Print.
Day, Jim. "British Columbia Town Raises By-Law against Oil Sands Pipe." Energy Daily 188 (2014): 2. Business Source Complete. Web. 11 Jan. 2016.
Holden, Michael. Pipe or Perish: Saving an Oil Industry at Risk. Calgary: Canada West, 2013. Print.
Macdonald, Alistair, Paul Vieira, and Chester Dawson. "Canada's Own Pipeline Problem. (Cover story)." Wall Street Journal - Eastern Edition 20 Apr. 2015: A1+. Academic Search Complete. Web. 11 Jan. 2016.
Marion, Michael A., Michael G. Massicotte, and Jessica L. Duhn. "Canada's Aging Oil and Gas Infrastructure: Who Will Pay? The Public and Private Cost Recovery Frameworks." Alberta Law Review 52.2 (2014): 331–363. Academic Search Complete. Web. 11 Jan. 2016.
Newman, Dwight G. Natural Resource Jurisdiction in Canada. Markham, Ontario: LexisNexis, 2013. Print.
"Why Keystone XL Is More Important to Canada Than the U.S." Stratfor Analysis (2015): 70. Business Source Complete. Web. 11 Jan. 2016.
Williams, Nia. "Canada's Long Delayed Trans Mountain Oil Pipeline Starts Operations." Reuters, 1 May 2024, www.reuters.com/business/energy/canadas-long-delayed-trans-mountain-oil-pipeline-set-start-operations-2024-05-01/. Accessed 17 Nov. 2024.