Hate crimes in the 2000s

Physical, verbal, and/or psychological assaults on individuals based on race, ethnicity, gender, religion, disability, and/or sexual orientation

Hate crimes remained a difficult legal, social, and political issue during the 2000s. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the push for legalized same-sex marriage led hate criminals to launch physical, verbal, and psychological attacks on people of various sociological backgrounds.

89138960-59803.jpg

Although law enforcement agencies have combated hate crimes for decades, the 2000s were a period in which a significant number of high-profile hate crimes took center stage. These crimes took a wide range of forms, from written and verbal threats to graffiti, demonstrations, and acts of physical violence. At the same time, however, federal and state governments took steps to more effectively prosecute those who commit hate crimes in the United States. Among the many issues that inspired hate crimes during the 2000s were the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the push for the legalization of same-sex marriage.

Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001

In some cases, hate crimes are committed by people who link their victims to the actions of others. In other words, they might hold their victims “responsible” for the crimes committed by people of the same race, ethnic group, or religious faith as their victims. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, which resulted in thousands of deaths in New York City, Pennsylvania, and Washington, DC, provide an example of this type of hate crime. Those attacks were perpetrated by members of al-Qaeda, a group of Islamic extremist terrorists, many of whom were of Arab descent. Once that fact had been established publicly (coupled with the fact that the media provided extensive coverage of the people who comprised al-Qaeda’s leadership), many Americans acted out against those whom they believed could have ties to al-Qaeda’s brand of terrorism.

Many of the crimes committed against people of Arab ethnicity or Islamic faith were based on a knee-jerk, paranoid reaction to the trauma of that day. For example, within hours of the attacks, an Islamic cultural center in Eugene, Oregon, began receiving death threats. In New York, a Bangladeshi taxi driver was viciously assaulted by his passenger, who thought he was a Muslim. Even those who, in the minds of the perpetrators, resembled Arabs or Muslims were victimized—there were hundreds of September 11–fueled hate crimes committed during the 2000s against Sikhs (who do not practice Islam but who wear long beards and robes and, to ignorant observers, resemble Arabs and Muslims). In the one-year period following the September 11 terrorist attacks, anti-Arab and anti-Muslim hate crimes spiked a staggering 1,600 percent.

Over time, the passions that inspired this spike in hate crimes diminished. This fact was in no small part the result of the activism of federal, state, and local governments and a wide range of religious- and social issue–oriented organizations conducting public outreach programs designed to reduce paranoia and inform the public on the differences between true Islam and the radical forms practiced by the terrorists. In New York City and Washington, DC, where the attacks were focused, the number of hate crimes dropped to negligible numbers. Some observers have cited the efforts of President George W. Bush and Congress to unify Americans against al-Qaeda and its sponsors as fearmongering that could have restarted crimes against Muslims and Arabs. Then again, as more people became educated on the nature of radical Islamic terrorism, statistics show that this type of hate crime slowly diminished in the latter part of the 2000s.

Same-Sex Marriage

The 2000s were a pivotal period for gay rights advocates. At the beginning of the decade, Vermont became the first state to allow “civil unions,” enabling same-sex couples to enjoy benefits given to legally married heterosexual couples. The law touched off a firestorm of controversy in other states and in the federal government. Meanwhile, courts across the country, including the US Supreme Court, began to hear cases that called for equal protections, including marriage, under the law for homosexual men and women. In 2004, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that nothing in the state’s constitution prohibited gay couples from marrying and that the state should therefore sanction same-sex marriage. Following the Massachusetts decision, several other states also moved to allow homosexual men and women to marry. At the same time, an increasing number of legislatures were addressing employee benefits for same-sex couples. Meanwhile, gay men and lesbians began to be portrayed more sympathetically in popular culture, with television programs and films presenting homosexuality in a mainstream light.

As the gay- and lesbian-rights agenda moved forward in the 2000s, social conservatives angrily denounced the trend. Many people acted in violent fashion. In 2003, a sixteen-year-old lesbian in Massachusetts was brutally attacked a day after she attended an event that promoted tolerance for the gay community. During that same year, a woman in New Jersey was fatally stabbed after it was revealed that she was a lesbian.

In fact, in 2003, there was a significant increase in antigay hate crimes. Following the US Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down a Texas law outlawing sodomy, there was a 24 percent rise in hate crimes against gay men and women in the United States. In New York City, antigay crimes rose 43 percent in the second half of 2003 when compared to the same period in 2002.

During the 2000s, each victory for the gay rights agenda seemed to trigger a violent backlash in the form of antigay hate crimes. Representatives of federal, state, and local governments spoke out against such violence and discrimination and preached tolerance. However, creating effective awareness campaigns has proven difficult, as it has been a challenge to calculate precisely the number of such crimes committed (hate crime reporting has been highly flawed). By the middle of the 2000s, according to one study, gay men and women were the target of hate crimes approximately six times more than the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reported.

Impact

Hate crimes significantly increased during the 2000s, in large part because of the September 11 terrorist attacks and the advancement of the gay rights agenda. However, the two issue areas—anti-Muslim/anti-Arab and anti-gay sentiment—have seen decidedly different outcomes. In the case of the former, violence against Muslims and Arabs (as well as those who appear to be members of either of those communities) decreased in the year after the terrorist attacks, a result of effective public outreach programs. In the latter, however, hate crime rates seemed to spike each time the gay community achieved a victory in the courts or the legislatures.

The high rate of occurrence of hate crimes in the United States during the 2000s fostered calls for better reporting of such activity as well as increased awareness campaigns and law enforcement practices. Legislatures were increasingly empowering law enforcement officials to understand the nature of hate crimes and to act appropriately against the perpetrators. The FBI increased its effort to better compile and distribute information and statistics on hate crimes in the United States. This data can help law enforcement target susceptible areas and more effectively prosecute offenders.

Bibliography

Disha, Ilir, James C. Cavendish, and Ryan D. King. “Historical Events and Spaces of Hate: Hate Crimes against Arabs and Muslims in Post-9/11 America.” Social Problems 58.1 (2011): 21–46. Print. Explores the roots of anti-Muslim and anti-Arab hate crimes in the period following the September 11 attacks.

Healy, Christopher. “Marriage’s Bloody Backlash.” Advocate 913 (2004): 38–40. Print. Focuses on the rising number of antigay hate crimes seemingly linked to the legalization of same-sex marriage.

Gerstenfeld, Phyllis B. Hate Crimes: Causes, Controls, and Controversies. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2010. Print. Reviews a number of high-profile hate crimes that were given coverage in American media and the legislative initiatives that were triggered by these events.

Swigonski, Mary E., Robin Mama, and Kelly Ward. From Hate Crimes to Human Rights: A Tribute to Matthew Shepard. New York: Routledge, 2001. Print. Describes how the gay rights movement has suffered a wide range of hate crimes and harsh discrimination, which led to a number of initiatives during the 2000s to protect the civil rights of gay and lesbian citizens.

Welch, Michael. Scapegoats of September 11: Hate Crimes and State Crimes in the War on Terror. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 2006. Print. Discusses how the public’s response to the radical Islamic terrorist attacks, coupled with the federal government’s efforts to unify Americans against such organizations, contributed to the type of scapegoating that lead to many hate crimes against Muslims and Arabs.

Wright, Ellen. “The Gaying of America: 2003 in Review.” Lesbian News 29.6 (2004): 21. Print. Describes some of the early 2000s victories in the gay rights movements in parallel to a number of high-profile gay rights–related hate crimes.