Forestry camps
Forestry camps are specialized correctional facilities that serve as an alternative to traditional incarceration for low-risk offenders, including both adults and juveniles. These camps offer a therapeutic environment where inmates engage in forestry-related activities, such as wildfire prevention, reforestation, and community beautification projects, while also receiving rehabilitative support through counseling and group therapy. The concept originated during the Great Depression as a solution to prison overcrowding, providing low-cost labor to state and federal forestry departments. Over the decades, forestry camps have evolved, sometimes incorporating military-style training or educational programs like gardening classes. Initially designed for adult male offenders, these facilities have expanded to include juvenile and female offenders. However, the overall use of forestry camps has significantly declined in recent years, with a notable drop in their application for juvenile justice. The diversity in camp structures and programs reflects varying approaches to rehabilitation and correctional philosophy, highlighting both the potential benefits and challenges of such alternatives to incarceration.
On this Page
Forestry camps
SIGNIFICANCE: Forestry camps have become an attractive alternative to prison incarceration for both adult and juvenile low-risk offenders. Not only are they less costly to operate than prisons, they also provide valuable services to states and the nation as a whole and are often effective in providing rehabilitative training for inmates.
Forestry camps are therapeutic alternative correctional facilities and programs in which inmates work as members of fire squads, create fire breaks, thin forests, participate in reforestation projects, assist local communities with forestry beautification projects, and work in such support positions as food preparation and housekeeping.
Forestry camp programs began during the Great Depression of the 1930’s with the implementation of the medical model of rehabilitation in an effort to alleviate prison overcrowding. Usually located in state and federal forests, the camps provided cheap labor to forestry departments experiencing budget shortages due to the depressed economy. By the 1940’s, the camps were becoming popular sites for placement of offenders convicted of evading the military draft. At that time, camp inmates were required to perform hard labor, while paying their states fees for the privilege of working in camps instead of being sent to prisons. The rehabilitative characteristics of most forestry camps included behavior-modification programs based on individual counseling and group therapy.
Inmates of forestry camps have always been mostly low-risk adult and juvenile offenders. In the beginning, adults convicted of lesser property crimes or nearing the ends of prison sentences after proving themselves trustworthy were the most likely candidates for forestry camps. By the 1950’s, some states were beginning to experiment with forestry camps for juvenile offenders as a way to deal with juvenile delinquency . However, it was not until 1974 that forestry camps were recognized nationally as alternative punishments for low-risk juveniles. This change was a direct result of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of that same year.
Forestry camps are so diverse that it is difficult to describe them in general terms. For example, some camps have military-type boot camp facilities, while others reflect the more relaxed therapeutic medical model. In some facilities, inmates engage in hard labor, while in others they participate in activities such as gardening classes taught by members of gardening clubs.
Forestry camps were originally designed only for adult men. Camps for juveniles opened later, and some states implemented forestry camps for female offenders. According to the Youth and the Juvenile Justice System 2022 National Report, the use of forestry camps has declined considerably in the twenty-first century. The use of such facilities dropped 78 percent from 2003 to 2019, while their use for juvenile offenders dropped 84 percent.
Bibliography
Puzzanchera, Charles, Sarah Hockenberry, and Melissa Sickmund. "Youth and the Juvenile Justice System: 2022 National Repot." National Center for Juvenile Justice, December 2022, ojjdp.ojp.gov/publications/2022-national-report.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2024.
Rojek, J. E., and G. G. Jensen. Exploring Delinquency: Causes and Control. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing, 1996.
Selke, W. A. Prisons in Crisis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993.