Socialized medicine

Socialized medicine is a health care model in which a country’s government funds health care with taxpayer money, enabling citizens to access medical treatment without an upfront cost. The term is often used interchangeably with “universal health care,” but there are important distinctions between the two.

Universal health care systems make preventive and emergency services available to all eligible residents of a country without necessarily getting all funding from taxpayers. Many universal health care systems supplement public health care services with private coverage to create a structure that grants collective access for affordable costs. Socialized medicine, on the other hand, implies a system that does not use any private funding and instead relies fully on taxpayer money. This money pays for hospitals, doctors, and all other health care-related facilities, equipment, and services. Some definitions even extend socialized medicine to cover prescription drugs. Most exclude optional procedures such as cosmetic surgery that are not medically necessary.

Background

In 1904, the Socialist Party of America proposed a national program to provide health insurance to all US citizens, an episode that historians now cite as the origin of the concept of socialized medicine. At the time, the country had very few government-run social programs, and modern medicine was still in its infancy. By the 1920s, medical science advancements had resulted in major quality-of-care improvements. However, those improvements were accompanied by high costs that only relatively wealthy people could afford. This affordability gap worsened considerably during the Great Depression (1929–1939), resulting in growing support for a system that would make modern medical care accessible to all.

However, the crippling financial realities of the Great Depression forced President Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882–1945) to make difficult decisions with regard to social programs. Roosevelt ultimately opted to institute unemployment insurance and old age pensions as part of the Social Security Act (1935), believing that the near future would bring an opportunity to institute health care reform. However, with political and ideological tensions rising between the United States and the Soviet Union in the aftermath of World War II (1939–1945), the notion of socialized medicine began to take on a negative connotation in the United States and the concept fell out of favor. Apart from the publicly funded hospital systems available to American military veterans beginning in the 1930s and the social programs Medicare and Medicaid established in 1965, the US health care system continued to be dominated by a privatized model.

Meanwhile, some other Western democracies including the United Kingdom and Canada adopted socialized systems to provide health care to all citizens. In the United Kingdom, health care was administered through the government-run National Health Service (NHS) beginning in 1948, while taxpayer-funded health care programs spread across Canada in the 1960s and reached universal, nationwide status in 1968. In the United Kingdom, politicians widely viewed the founding of the NHS as a protective measure against the spread of communist political ideas. These politicians believed that citizens would be less likely to support communist policies if the government provided for citizens’ medical needs. In Canada, voter support for a national socialized health care model became so strong that political parties who openly opposed it retained little chance of posting competitive election performances.

Topic Today

Most developed countries now use a system that meets the definition of universal health care even if it does not technically qualify as a fully socialized model. Purist definitions of socialized medicine require that government funding covers all preventive and emergency health services and the use of private, independently operated, for-profit services is discouraged if not prohibited. However, the functional definition of socialized medicine shows some flexibility, as the term is widely understood to refer to systems that provide essential, medically necessary health care services to all citizens and legal residents at no out-of-pocket cost. The majority of countries that feature socialized medicine systems also support a parallel system offering private care to those willing to pay for it. Patients may choose to access private services to bypass lengthy wait times for medical procedures or undergo elective procedures not covered by public health insurance.

Socialized medicine systems also show significant variation with regard to what is and is not publicly covered. The most comprehensive examples offer full medical and dental care for both preventive and emergency treatment, as well as rehabilitative services like physical and occupational therapy along with heavily subsidized or no-cost access to prescription drugs. Others reduce no-cost access to a narrower set of guidelines, covering only what is immediately medically necessary and requiring patients to cover supplements like dental treatment, rehabilitative services, and prescription drugs through private insurance or by paying for them out of pocket.

The United States remains an outlier among developed countries for its continued hesitance to abandon its privatized health care system. Proponents of health care reform have long argued that politicians and others (including medical and insurance industry interest groups) tend to use the term "socialized medicine" as a scare tactic to paint any steps toward universal health care as steps toward socialism and loss of freedom. For example, conservatives attacked the Affordable Care Act (2010), which introduced reforms to make private health insurance more affordable and available to more individuals, a socialized medicine even though it does not fit the description. Most health policy experts decry this politicization of the issue and reiterate the distinctions between universal health care, socialized medicine, and related terms such as single-payer health care. Many also point out that health care costs in the US far exceed costs in most other developed nations, while US health outcomes are often worse.

However, socialized medicine systems do carry some drawbacks that merit consideration and play into the ongoing US health care debate. They inevitably require governments to increase tax revenues to finance health care. They also tend to function more efficiently in countries with smaller populations. From a practical standpoint, socialized medicine systems are also structured under the assumption that at any given time, more people are paying into the system than are using it. If the opposite occurs for any reason—such as an aging population with large numbers of retired people drawing heavily on publicly funded medical care—the entire system risks collapse. Furthermore, wait times for services like emergency care and potentially lifesaving operations can be lengthy in socialized medicine systems. This is usually because funding limitations strain available resources as governments try to balance citizens’ health care needs with the finite realities of taxpayer financing.

During the early 2020s, amid the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there was renewed debate over socialized medicine in the US. Supporters argued that the government's subsidization of COVID-19 tests and vaccines to make them free for all demonstrated how the nation could shift to a socialized system. Critics, however, continued to argue that it would become too much of a financial burden and potentially have a negative impact on personal freedoms.

Socialized medicine remains a highly contentious concept. Some politicians and voters, particularly progressive liberals, continue to advocate for a true socialized medicine system in the United States. They cite the existence of similar systems among virtually all other developed countries. Others argue that socialized medicine has its own inherent drawbacks. They believe that despite its many shortcomings, the private model used in the United States has vaulted the country to a global leadership position in breakthrough medical research and prescription drug development programs.

Bibliography

Bredesen, Phil. Fresh Medicine: How to Fix, Reform, and Build a Sustainable Health Care System. Grove/Atlantic, 2010.

Gilligan, Heather. “Socialized Medicine Was Coined in the US, Not Europe.” Timeline, 3 Feb. 2017, timeline.com/socialized-medicine-was-coined-in-the-us-not-europe-30438fad9d69. Accessed 16 Apr. 2019.

Marks, Clifford. "Inside the American Medical Association's Fight Over Single-Payer Health Care." The New Yorker, 22 Feb. 2022, www.newyorker.com/science/annals-of-medicine/the-fight-within-the-american-medical-association. Accessed 29 Sept. 2023.

Noah, Timothy. “A Short History of Health Care.” Slate, 13 Mar. 2007, slate.com/news-and-politics/2007/03/a-short-history-of-health-care.html. Accessed 16 Apr. 2019.

Reinhardt, Uwe E. "What Is 'Socialized Medicine'?: A Taxonomy of Health Care Systems." The New York Times, 8 May 2009, archive.nytimes.com/economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/08/what-is-socialized-medicine-a-taxonomy-of-health-care-systems/. Accessed 29 Sept. 2023.

Torrey, Trisha. “Differences Between Universal Health Care and Socialized Medicine.” Verywell Health, 27 Feb. 2020, www.verywellhealth.com/is-universal-healthcare-the-same-as-socialized-medicine-3969754. Accessed 29 Sept. 2023.

Torrey, Trisha. “Socialized Medicine.” Verywell Health, 28 Feb. 2020, www.verywellhealth.com/what-is-socialized-medicine-2615267. Accessed 29 Sept. 2023.

Ubel, Peter. “What Socialized Medicine Would Mean for Your Health.” Forbes, 21 Nov. 2018, www.forbes.com/sites/peterubel/2018/11/21/what-socialized-medicine-would-mean-for-your-health/#5f2cd9546e9a. Accessed 16 Apr. 2019.

Weems, Robert E. “A History of Socialized Medicine.” KMUW Wichita, 2 Jun. 2015, www.kmuw.org/post/history-socialized-medicine. Accessed 16 Apr. 2019.