Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is a serious condition characterized by the body's widespread response to various forms of trauma, including infections, organ failure, or physical injuries such as burns and gunshot wounds. Recognizing SIRS early is crucial for effective treatment, as it can prevent the progression to more severe conditions like sepsis and septic shock, which can lead to organ failure and death. Clinically, SIRS is identified when a patient exhibits at least two of four key symptoms: altered body temperature, increased heart rate, elevated respiratory rate, and changes in white blood cell count. These symptoms indicate the body’s active effort to combat infection or injury.
The importance of SIRS lies in the early diagnosis and treatment, which can substantially improve patient outcomes. Historically, SIRS was formally acknowledged in the early 1990s, allowing clinicians to recognize the early signs of systemic infection rather than waiting for more severe symptoms to manifest. By identifying the interconnected nature of these symptoms, healthcare providers can initiate appropriate interventions before the condition escalates, thereby reducing the risk of severe complications. Understanding SIRS is essential for both medical professionals and patients, as it highlights the body's initial responses to serious health threats and the importance of timely medical attention.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) refers to a body’s massive, system-wide internal response to the sudden onset of an infection, or more generally to the introduction into the body of a trauma such as a single organ failure, a drug overdose, complications from invasive surgery, an aneurysm, a massive burn, or any blunt force, such as wounds from a gunshot or a car accident.
SIRS, if identified early enough, helps doctors direct appropriate treatment to prevent the incipient infection from developing and inevitably causing far more damage to the body and its organs. If SIRS goes undetected, the infection will move quickly forward and attack a specific organ, such as the kidney or the lungs. That condition is known as sepsis, and represents a significant challenge for doctors to bring it under control. Should that fail, the patient will drop into septic shock, in which organ failure is most often beyond the ability of medical professionals to address, causing the death of the patient.
Background
Doctors understand that part of diagnosing critical internal organ system failure is to recognize and trace the earliest symptoms of the aggressive effort by the body to repel infection. Doctors long understood that the difficult process of organ failure gave rise to elements that indicated the dimensions and the location of this struggle against infection. Although sepsis and septic shock have long been defined by internists, diagnosticians, and general practitioners, and in turn endorsed by the American Medical Association and its chapters, SIRS itself was not even proposed as a consistent condition until the early 1990s, when the American College of Chest Physicians moved to officially accept SIRS. At the time, diagnosticians understood that sepsis and septic shock were extreme conditions, and that there was an earlier stage in which the elements that would become sepsis and, in turn, develop into septic shock would first be definable and, hence, treatable. To treat infection early could help minimize the trauma of medical protocols once sepsis has settled in.
To be in this early stage of infection resistance, a patient must evidence two of four symptoms that are each an element of the body’s systemic defense mechanism. Because changes in body temperature are critical to warding off infection, patients diagnosed with SIRS already evidence minor changes in normal temperatures. Normal body temperature is 98.6; SIRS patients can range from 96.8 to 100.5. In addition, heart rate increases to somewhere in the neighborhood of 90 beats per minute—elevated, but still below 100 beats per minute, considered the threshold for tachycardia. Moreover, as the body engages in its directed campaign to resist the infection, respiration increases under the strain of the fight: the average is usually twelve to fifteen breaths per minute, but moves to twenty when a patient is suffering from SIRS. Finally, because the body produces white blood cells as part of its effort to combat infection, in patients with SIRS there is a change in white blood cell count. It drops if the body is only beginning to battle the infection; it may spike when the body has been fighting for some time and the developed white blood cells have been used and there is a spillage of new, partially developed white blood cells to continue the effort. A further symptom of SIRS is an agitated and often highly anxious mental state.
Impact
What is crucial to medical treatment and the recovery of the patient is early diagnosis. By not waiting until infection has already affected particular organs, diagnosticians can greatly improve the efficiency and success rate of medical treatments. For generations, medical procedures and treatments centered on taking steps after the body manifested a particular set of symptoms. However, often, the body was already engaged in the effort to battle the infection long before those symptoms appeared. Spotting the subtler early-stage symptoms can lead an internist to identify SIRS and, in turn, begin to trace the direction the infection is developing as a way to head off a more profound and debilitating impact.
The key is to see connections among and between symptoms rather than treat each isolated symptom. That the identification of the earliest stages of an infection, when it is still simmering and just beginning to register in the response activities of the heart and lungs, can lead to its successful treatment is at the heart of the importance of defining SIRS. If the attending physician, for whatever reason, fails to constellate the symptoms and decides rather to treat only one, the possibly for greater harm down the road exponentially increases. However, taking as a clue the combination of these early-stage symptoms, the doctor can successfully treat the infection long before more drastic measures would be required.
Bibliography
Botwinski, C. "Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome." Neonatal Nursing. Ed. D. Crawford and M. Morris. New York: Springer, 2011. 21–28. Print.
Cavaillon, J. M., and C. Adrie. Sepsis and Non-Infectious Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome: From Biology to Critical Care. Hoboken: Wiley, 2008. Print.
Cornstedt, P. et al. "The Systemic Inflammatory Response in Acutely Hospitalised Medical Patients: A Cohort Study." Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (2009): 17–67. Print.
Davies, M. E., and P-O Hagen. "Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome." British Journal of Surgery 84.7 (1997): 920–35. Print.
Nyström, P-O. "The Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome: Definition and Aetiology." Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 41 (1998): 1–7. Print.
Rangel-Frausto, M. S., et al. "The Natural History of the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome." The Journal of the American Medical Association 272.2 (1995): 117–23. Print.
Shankar-Hari, M., et al. "Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock." The Journal of the American Medical Association 315.8 (2016): 775. Print.