Alien land laws

At varying points in the country’s history, US jurisdictions have adopted laws imposing restrictions on land ownership. Such laws primarily limited legal land ownership rights to US citizens and effectively functioned to prevent immigrant groups comprised of racial minorities from settling in specific areas. Legal scholars and historians commonly refer to these statutes as alien land laws, which mainly functioned to the disadvantage of Chinese and Japanese immigrants during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.

Alien land laws usually operated at the state level. They were once part of the legal codes in states such as California, Oregon, and Washington. Some alien land laws, particularly early ones, explicitly identified the racial and ethnic groups disqualified from land ownership and property rights. Many later laws removed overt references to race or national origin, instead using legal technicalities related to US citizenship to achieve the desired exclusionary effect. Contemporary observers widely characterize alien land laws as another iteration of historical patterns of racial segregation and discrimination.

rsspencyclopedia-20230420-7-194886.jpgrsspencyclopedia-20230420-7-194968.jpg

Background

Ultimately, alien land laws were rooted in the White supremacist attitudes that shaped the first century of US history. White racial superiority was widely used to justify the institution of slavery that was used throughout the United States during its colonial history and, during the nation’s early post-independence era, in the country’s southern states. Deep disagreements over the ethics of slavery were a primary cause of the American Civil War (1861–1865). Following the war, a legal structure enforcing racial segregation was widely implemented in former slave states in the American South, which were collectively known as Jim Crow laws.

After the end of the Civil War, the United States began experiencing an uptick in immigration from source countries in eastern Asia, led by China and Japan. Chinese immigration had started in the mid-nineteenth century, prior to the Civil War, but quickly accelerated during the Reconstruction era. At the time, the United States was undergoing a period of rapid industrialization, and Asian immigrants arrived in large numbers to work in railroad construction, gold mining, agriculture, factory-based industrial production, and the country’s fast-growing garment industry. Asian migrants mainly settled along the US Pacific coastline, and as their numbers grew, the backlash from established White populations in these areas increased.

Citing xenophobic concerns over the impact of mass Asian immigration on local labor markets, White communities began pressuring lawmakers to act. The most notorious example of the resultant legislation was the federal Chinese Exclusion Act (1882), which effectively brought immigration from China to an abrupt stop and prevented Chinese immigrants who had already reached the United States from becoming legally recognized citizens. The Chinese Exclusion Act’s passage triggered a surge in Japanese immigration, as migrants from Japan were not subject to the restrictions and were needed to fill gaping holes in regional labor markets. By the time, the Immigration Act (1917) imposed similar restrictions on Japanese immigration. Alien land laws had become a common legal and economic tool used by White communities to prevent the permanent settlement of Asian immigrants in their neighborhoods, towns, cities, and states.

Overview

One of the earliest and most overt examples of alien land laws was contained in Oregon’s state constitution, which went into force when Oregon joined the Union in 1859. The original version of Oregon’s constitution explicitly stated that people of Chinese national origin were not permitted to own real estate in Oregon. Twenty years later, California passed constitutional amendments that imposed similar restrictions on people of Asian origin by stating that only Black or White alien nationals were permitted to own land in the state. In 1886, following race riots in Seattle that saw a frenzied White mob attack the city’s Chinese population, Washington implemented changes to its constitution that disqualified alien nationals who were not eligible for US citizenship from owning land in the state.

The circumvention of explicit references to race achieved by restricting land ownership to US citizens and individuals who could qualify for citizenship essentially became a model for later alien land laws. California used this precise approach in its Alien Land Law (1913), which barred foreign nationals who were ineligible for US citizenship from buying or owning property in the state. Further waves of alien land laws were widely passed throughout the western United States from 1919 to 1923. By the 1940s, comparable statutes had been adopted in states such as Minnesota, Nebraska, Texas, Utah, and Wyoming.

Asian immigrants used creative strategies to circumvent the laws. Some bought land through sympathetic White accomplices or business structures not subject to ownership restrictions. Others enlisted their first-generation children, who held US citizenship by virtue of having been born in the United States, to buy land on their behalf. Alien land laws also faced court challenges, though to variable levels of success.

During World War II (1939–1943), enforcement of alien land laws intensified due to wartime security concerns surrounding the Japanese American population. However, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) struck down alien land laws during the postwar period, finding that they infringed on constitutional guarantees of equal protection under the law. The final active alien land laws were functionally invalidated by the 1952 SCOTUS ruling in the case of Sei Fuji v. California, which concluded that California’s alien land laws violated the Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution.

Though alien land laws have largely receded into history, some modern forms of state legislation echo their legacy. In 2023, Florida governor Ron DeSantis (1978–) signed State Senate bill 264 (SB-264) into law, which formally bans “foreign principals” from purchasing properties located within 10 miles (16 kilometers) of critical infrastructure or military facilities in the state. SB-264 further bans Chinese nationals from buying real estate anywhere in Florida, unless they are already legally residing in the United States and seeking solely to purchase residential property.

Bibliography

“A More Perfe-ct Union.” Smithsonian National Museum of American History, amhistory.si.edu/perfectunion/resources/history.html#:~:text=Alien%20Land%20Law%20(Webb%2DHaney,to%20own%20land%20in%20California. Accessed 18 June 2023.

“Alien Land Laws.” Densho Encyclopedia, 8 Oct. 2020, encyclopedia.densho.org/Alien‗land‗laws/. Accessed 18 June 2023.

Chen, Edgar. “Asian Immigrants Are Once Again Targeted by Real Estate Bans.” New York University School of Law, 26 May 2023, www.justsecurity.org/86722/with-new-alien-land-laws-asian-immigrants-are-once-again-targeted-by-real-estate-bans/#:~:text=The%20Florida%20law%20prevents%20any,any%20agricultural%20or%20strategic%20value. Accessed 18 June 2023.

“Chinese Immigration and the Chinese Exclusion Acts.” U.S. Department of State, Office of the Historian, history.state.gov/milestones/1866-1898/chinese-immigration#:~:text=In%20the%201850s%2C%20Chinese,especially%20in%20the%20garment%20industry. Accessed 18 June 2023.

De Leon, Adrian. “The Long History of Racism Against Asian Americans in the US.” PBS, 9 Apr. 2020, www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/the-long-history-of-racism-against-asian-americans-in-the-u-s. Accessed 18 June 2023.

McClain, Charles. Japanese Immigrants and American Law: The Alien Land Laws and Other Issues. Routledge, 2019.

Mineo, Liz. “The Scapegoating of Asian Americans.” The Harvard Gazette, 24 Mar. 2021, news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2021/03/a-long-history-of-bigotry-against-asian-americans/. Accessed 18 June 2023.

Newcombe, Emma. “How States Used Land Laws to Exclude and Displace Asian Americans.” Governing: The Future of States and Localities, 23 Nov. 2022, www.governing.com/context/how-states-used-land-laws-to-exclude-and-displace-asian-americans. Accessed 18 June 2023.