Analysis: Eugene Debs: "What Can We Do for Working People?"
Eugene V. Debs, a prominent figure during America's Gilded Age, advocated for the working class through his essay "What Can We Do for Working People?" In this period marked by stark economic disparities, Debs critiqued the prevailing capitalist ideals that primarily benefitted wealthy industrialists while leaving laborers with minimal gains. He argued that uniting into labor unions was essential for workers to reclaim control over their lives and secure equitable wages, safe working conditions, and reasonable working hours. Debs emphasized the importance of political engagement, asserting that the ballot box could be a powerful tool for workers to elect representatives who would support pro-labor policies. His perspective contrasted with other labor leaders who sought to improve conditions for skilled workers specifically, as he championed an inclusive approach that encompassed all industrial laborers. Debs's vision resonated with contemporary reformers and was influenced by utopian ideals, envisioning a society free of class divisions through collective action and voting. Ultimately, Debs's work highlighted the urgent need for solidarity among workers to challenge the established economic structures and advocate for their rights and dignity in the workforce.
Analysis: Eugene Debs: "What Can We Do for Working People?"
Date: April 1890
Author: Eugene V. Debs
Genre: article; editorial; essay
Summary Overview
During the so-called Gilded Age of the late nineteenth century, two competing visions of America were propagated. One, put forth by people such as industrialist Andrew Carnegie, emphasized the beneficial role of the wealthy in society. The other, which was held by union and Socialist Party leader Eugene Victor Debs, was more focused on working-class Americans whose well-being was often at the mercy of factory owners’ desire for more wealth. In his essay “What Can We Do for Working People?,” Debs presents the case that organizing into unions will allow working people to control their destiny and throw off the ideals of the wealthy, whose goal is to ensure that workers are employed for as little money as possible. By utilizing the power of the ballot box during elections and incorporating collective action in the workplace, working people will be better able to determine the course of their lives.
Defining Moment
Debs wrote his essay at a very difficult time for America’s nascent labor movement. The prosperity of Gilded Age America was concentrated in the hands of those who owned the means of production. Men such as John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, and John Pierpont Morgan controlled entire industries and spent as little as possible on their workers’ wages and safety. The working class saw little, if any, benefit from the booming economy of the Industrial Revolution, and they exercised little power over the terms of their employment.
Though trade unions had worked to organize skilled workers for over a century, common laborers had no such protection until the rise of the Knights of Labor, which sought to bring together common workers and collectively negotiate to improve their lot. However, because of the violence that occurred during a labor rally at Chicago’s Haymarket Square in 1886, many US citizens associated unions with foreign radicalism and the ideologies of anarchism and socialism.
Debs would not be deterred, however, and he continued to argue in favor of unions as the only way for working people to achieve higher wages, safe working conditions, and an eight-hour day. But the labor movement did not come together to create a united front: as trade unions such as the American Federation of Labor (AFL) organized to improve the conditions of specially skilled workers, the Knights of Labor, which represented the interests of common workers, declined in influence as they became associated with radicalism. The AFL sought to distance itself from partisan politics, whereas Debs encouraged workers to take action both in the workplace and at the polling place in order to elect pro-labor candidates who would institute the long-term goals of the labor movement. Whereas AFL leader Samuel Gompers preferred an issues-based alliance with politicians from the major parties, Debs encouraged workers to become active participants in the political organizations dedicated to the working peoples’ agenda, such as the Socialist Labor Party (SLP) and the People’s Party (also known as the Populist Party).
Debs’s perspective was much more in line with the view espoused two years earlier by utopian novelist Edward Bellamy in Looking Backward (1888). A thorough critique of Gilded Age capitalism, Bellamy’s view appealed to working people, with whom his ideal society, free of social divisions and conflict, resonated. But the only way to achieve a utopia such as Bellamy espoused was through voting and through organizing industrial workers to take control of their own fate.
Author Biography
Eugene V. Debs was born in Terre Haute, Indiana, on November 5, 1855. Like many young men at that time, he left school and entered the workplace at the age of fourteen. Around 1870, he became active in the railways employees union, the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, and started a career as an advocate for working people. During the 1880s, Debs, still a member of the Democratic Party, won a seat in the Indiana state legislature. However, his true calling was with the railroad workers, and he became national secretary of the Brotherhood in 1880. It was during this period that his essay, “What Can We Do for Working People?” appeared in the union’s periodical, the Locomotive Firemen’s Magazine.
During the 1890s, Debs would expand his role nationally and found and lead the American Railway Union (ARU) in 1893. The ARU, which would soon become the largest organized union in the nation, accepted any white railway worker below the position of foreman, and Debs became instrumental in some of the union’s most important labor actions before becoming a national political figure and running for president of the United States as a Socialist in 1900, 1904, 1908, and 1912.
Document Analysis
Having been involved in the trade union movement for over a decade, Debs was adjusting his beliefs as the labor movement began to transform. Rather than concern himself with the betterment of working conditions of a particular industry, Debs’s essay reflects a growing awareness of the commonality of all industrial workers, skilled and unskilled. Debs was one of a growing number of reformers, often from the upper classes of American society, who were considering ways to appease American workers who were voicing and demonstrating their dissatisfaction with their pay, working conditions, or terms of employment.
Debs begins the essay by noting that reformers in his time sought to ensure that industrial workers were pacified enough to continue to provide the cheapest possible labor for the benefit of America’s factory owners and industrialists (much as slaveholders had before them). Each group of reformers is addressed by Debs, who analyzes their proposals and notes that each refuses to consider paying “fair, honest wages,” which, Debs claims, is “disgusting and degrading to the last degree.” Debs asks, “What can workingmen do for themselves?,” and then answers that they can organize into unions to collectively bargain for what is in their best interests and can utilize their voting power to choose candidates who will best represent them in state and federal government.
Bibliography and Additional Reading
Ginger, Ray. The Bending Cross: A Biography of Eugene Victor Debs. Chicago: Haymarket, 2007 Print.
Kloppenberg, James T. Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Thought, 1870–1920. New York: Oxford UP, 1988. Print.
Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Gary Marks. It Didn’t Happen Here: Why Socialism Failed in the United States. New York: Norton, 2000. Print.
Salvatore, Nick. Eugene V. Debs: Citizen and Socialist. 2nd ed. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 2007. Print.