Analysis: Executive Order 9547
Executive Order 9547, issued by President Harry S. Truman on May 2, 1945, marked a significant moment in international law and the prosecution of war crimes. Following World War II's conclusion in Europe, this executive order appointed Justice Robert H. Jackson as the U.S. chief prosecutor for the upcoming war crimes trials against leaders of the Axis powers. The order was a response to the atrocities committed during the war, particularly the Holocaust, which resulted in the deaths of millions, including six million Jews. This initiative was rooted in previous agreements made by Allied leaders, who sought justice for war crimes and aimed to establish a legal precedent for accountability on an international scale.
Truman's order committed the United States to participate in an international tribunal, laying the groundwork for the Nuremberg Trials, where defendants would be held accountable for their actions. The executive order emphasized not only the legal and structural aspects of this commitment but also its ideological significance—seeking to define and confront the unprecedented crimes of the Nazi regime. Truman's actions reflected a broader commitment to uphold justice and foster collaboration among nations in the aftermath of the war, setting a precedent for future international legal proceedings. The implications of Executive Order 9547 continue to resonate in discussions about justice, accountability, and the international community's response to crimes against humanity.
Analysis: Executive Order 9547
Date: May 2, 1945
Author: Harry S. Truman
Genre: law
Summary Overview
On May 2, 1945, President Harry S. Truman issued Executive Order 9547. At the time, World War II was ending in Europe, and representatives from dozens of nations were meeting in San Francisco to draft the United Nations Charter. President Truman himself had just taken office, following the death of his predecessor, Franklin D. Roosevelt, a few weeks before. He had inherited a world war to finish and an international peace to negotiate. He had also inherited the new mantle of American world leadership. With this executive order, President Truman appointed a US official to prosecute international war crimes and dedicated the United States to a prolonged engagement in international affairs.
Defining Moment
On May 8, 1945, Germany signed an unconditional surrender at Reims, France, thus ending the war in Europe. World War II had begun, officially, with the invasion of Poland in 1939 and raged across multiple continents and oceans. However, the aggression of Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler and the Axis allies had begun much earlier. In Europe alone, millions of men and women had died in combat as well as in bombings and air raids. However, beyond the casualties of the fighting, more than six million Jewish people and other Europeans had perished under Nazi persecution. They had died from mass shootings; from forced marches; from violence in ghettoes; from starvation, disease, and exhaustive labor in concentration camps; and from extermination policies carried out in gas chambers in Nazi death camps.
The systematic murder of so many civilians led to an unprecedented international response. As early as December 17, 1942, the leaders of the Allied Powers condemned Nazi extermination policies and promised retribution. As the war progressed, the Allies began planning for the conclusion of the war and its aftermath. In October 1943, the governments of the United States, the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and China issued a joint declaration known as the Moscow Declaration, in which they stated that all persons guilty of “atrocities, massacres and cold-blooded mass executions” would be sent back to the countries of their crimes for trial or would be tried by joint decision of the Allied Powers at the end of the war.
In 1945, with the surrender of the Axis powers in Europe, the Allies followed through on the promises of the Moscow Declaration. Even before peace was declared, the United States had begun to plan for the postwar trial of designated war criminals. Some debate had occurred among leaders of the Moscow Conference nations, as some Soviet officials preferred to forego trials and immediately execute members of the Nazi leadership. Others, including President Roosevelt, insisted on public trials to establish a new international precedent for the illegality of atrocities such as those committed by the Nazis. Truman inherited this charge.
To that end, on May 2, 1945, the newly sworn-in President Truman issued Executive Order 9547, by which he appointed US Supreme Court Associate Justice Robert H. Jackson the chief prosecutor for the United States in the war crimes trials that would follow an armistice in Europe. By this order, Truman committed the United States to the conduct of an international tribunal.
A few months later, on August 8, 1945, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and the Soviet Union signed the London Agreement to establish the International Military Tribunal “for the trial of war criminals whose offenses have no particular geographical location whether they be accused individually or in their capacity as members of the organizations or groups or in both capacities” and to begin the Nuremberg Trial Proceedings of those identified as war criminals. Under the charter of the tribunal, each signatory nation had to appoint a member and an alternate to serve on the tribunal, to hear the evidence, and to render a decision. Truman's Executive Order 9547 had already designated the official for the United States.
Document Analysis
Executive Order 9547 is a fairly direct document. It signifies the executive power of the US president in appointing federal officials and in navigating international affairs and treaties. The document's first line cites this executive authority—“the authority vested in me as President and as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, under the Constitution and statutes of the United States”—to give credence to the terms of the order that followed. Although not a treaty approved by Congress, the document obligates the United States to an international standard of justice and sets a precedent that remains a source of debate today.
The primary provision confirms the appointment of Robert H. Jackson as the US representative and chief counsel “in preparing and prosecuting charges of atrocities and war crimes against such of the leaders of the European Axis powers and their principal agents and accessories.” Provision 1 goes on to state that the US counsel will serve on an international military tribunal to hear the charges against those brought to trial. With this provision, Truman formalizes American support not only for prosecution of war crimes but also for the conduct of trials by a joint body, an international military tribunal.
The second and third provisions of the document give added substance to Jackson's appointment. Truman is not just appointing an official representative, he is putting the full force of the executive branch of the US government behind that representative and his work for the tribunal. With Provision 2, Truman commands all executive agencies as well as the armed forces—which fall under his authority—to make available any personnel and resources needed by the representative to fulfill his duties to the tribunal. In a similar vein, Provision 3 vests the representative with the power “to cooperate with, and receive the assistance of” foreign governments in order to “accomplish the purposes of this order.” By this provision, President Truman gives Jackson the authority to treat with representatives of other nations to accomplish an international charge.
However, the document is not merely an order intended to authorize a new appointment and to command executive agencies and armed forces to support that appointment. It is not just a structural and legal tenet. The order is also an ideological statement. On August 24, 1941, British prime minister Winston Churchill referred to Nazi atrocities in Europe as “a crime without a name.” This document, and the trials that followed, signaled the effort made by the international community to name and respond to those crimes.
Glossary
hereunder: subsequent to this; below this
Bibliography and Additional Reading
Donovan, Robert J. Conflict and Crisis: The Presidency of Harry S. Truman, 1945–1948. New York: Norton, 1977. Print.
Ferrell, Robert H., ed. Off the Record: The Private Papers of Harry S. Truman. New York: Harper, 1980. Print.
Kochavi, Arieh J. Prelude to Nuremberg: Allied War Crimes Policy and the Question of Punishment. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1998. Print.
Rice, Earl, Jr. The Nuremberg Trials. San Diego: Lucent, 1997. Print.
Tusa, Ann, & John Tusa. The Nuremberg Trial. New York: Skyhorse, 2010. Print