Analysis: Of Plymouth Plantation

Date: 1630

Author: Bradford, William

Genre: journal

Summary Overview

An English Pilgrim, William Bradford was one of the leaders of Plymouth Colony. Established by the religious dissenters after their arrival in Cape Cod on the Mayflower in 1620, Plymouth became the first permanent European settlement in New England. Bradford’s Of Plymouth Plantation, written mostly during the period from 1630 through 1646, serves as the leading primary source on the Pilgrims’ journey, settlement, and social and political practices. The history was not published, however, until 1856, some two centuries after Bradford’s death.

Of Plymouth Plantation offers a lens on the extreme challenges facing the small group of Pilgrims as they sought to establish a new home in America. These excerpts focus on the Pilgrims’ arrival and immediate concerns, which included establishing a form of self-government through the Mayflower Compact; Bradford was a signatory to this document. The complete text also provides commentary of the colony’s many struggles and rare successes, including an account of the first Thanksgiving.

Document Analysis

William Bradford’s Of Plymouth Plantation is a lengthy, complex work detailing the efforts of the Pilgrims who called on God’s providence to settle the wild lands of New England through the colony at Plymouth. The excerpts presented here, all written several years after their occurrence, show the author’s belief in the hand of God in shaping the Pilgrims’ mission in New England through both direct statement and the use of comparison between biblical and human events. By setting forth the claim that New England was a wild land filled with trepidation and danger, Bradford establishes the Pilgrims’ work as one even more difficult that that endured by biblical figures such as Moses and the apostle Paul. At the same time, Bradford acknowledges the practical efforts of the Pilgrims’ leaders to find success by working with the “strangers,” those Mayflower passengers whom the group’s financial backers had added to the party to fill the slots vacated by Pilgrims who had chosen to stay on in the Netherlands. This uneasy alliance culminated in the signing of the Mayflower Compact, a document creating the English colonists’ first system of self-government in North America and paving the way for the system of local government employed in New England for centuries to come.

Prefacing these selections from Of Plymouth Plantation is Bradford’s history of the Scrooby congregation’s decision to leave England for the Netherlands, their experiences in that country, and the efforts to organize the Pilgrims to migrate to the northern reaches of the Virginia Colony to found a settlement where they could practice religion without interference. The process of organizing and embarking upon the transatlantic journey was a difficult one leading to a voyage that was undertaken on an overcrowded ship shared with a group of strangers who did not hold to the Pilgrims’ Separatist views.

Yet Bradford condenses this arduous journey into scant paragraphs, focusing a larger quantity of text instead on the ship’s arrival and the group’s ensuing reactions. His teleological interpretations are immediately apparent in his discussion of the Pilgrims’ thanking of “the God of heaven, who had brought them over the vast and furious ocean, and delivered them from all the periles and miseries therof”; clearly, Bradford saw the success of the voyage as a mark of divine intervention rather than skillful sailing on the part of the Mayflower’s hard-pressed crew. He then declares his shock at the challenging prospects facing the ragtag group of arrivals, whom, he bemoans, have survived the difficulties of the lengthy journey only to be met with a barren welcome. He emphasizes this idea by listing point by point the lacking amenities that a traveler within the civilized world might logically expect: “no freinds to wellcome them, . . . [no] inns to . . . refresh their weatherbeaten bodys, no houses or much less townes to repaire too, to seek for succoure.”

A firm believer in Providence, Bradford employs a degree of typology—the use of biblical events, particularly from the Old Testament, as symbolic representations presaging later Christian belief—throughout his writing. For example, he dramatically contrasts the Pilgrims’ arrival in New England with Moses’ biblical search for the Promised Land, focusing largely on the differences between the two experiences rather than drawing direct parallels. “Nether could they . . . goe up to the tope of Pisgah,” he writes, referencing the biblical passage in which God commands Moses to climb to the top of Mount Pisgah to view the distant but longed-for Promised Land. Instead, Bradford claims, the Pilgrims cannot find such a “more goodly cuntrie” due to the overwhelming wilderness presented by the New England landscape. Furthermore, Bradford expressed concerns quite specific to the Americas. He points out that in the Book of Acts, the apostle Paul and his “shipwraked company” received “no smale kindnes” from the islanders of Malta, where that ancient group managed to swim ashore. In Acts, Paul and his party are received by a group of natives who build them a fire and help recuperate from their doomed adventure. Bradford, however, frets that the native peoples of New England were more likely to shoot the Pilgrims “full of arrows” than to offer them a warm fire or other assistance. In fact, Bradford’s worries were not entirely justified; although the settlers endured many challenges during the difficult winter at Plymouth and conflicts between the group and native peoples did eventually arise, the local Wampanoags were instrumental in contributing to the group’s survival by teaching them to grow corn and providing other early support for the struggling Pilgrims.

Bradford continues by pointing out the massive difficulties facing the arriving Mayflower passengers. He recalls the pessimistic comments of captain and crew as they sought to find a suitable landing spot in a timely manner so that the ship could return to England before its food supplies ran too low; Bradford records that the crew even threatened at time to “turne them [the Pilgrims] and their goods ashore and leave them,” presumably without regard for whether the group was pleased with the location where they were left. He reiterates the extreme emptiness of the landscape in terms of available assistance, emphasizing their recognition that they had left their friends and family far behind. Bradford also wryly acknowledges that the possibility of help from the group’s professed backers was slim by pointing out that “how the case stode betweene them and the marchanta at their coming away” had already been discussed.

Thus, Bradford saw the blessing of God and Providence as the sole possibility of not just spiritual but also worldly salvation for the troubled migrants, declaring that “the spirite of God and his grace” were the only saving factors remaining. He speaks more or less directly to the descendents of the original traveling party—one of the few times that Bradford clearly addresses a specific audience—to recall the great sacrifices that the Pilgrims had been willing to make and the extent to which God stepped in to preserve his faithful followers in the brutal New England land. Another series of comparisons between the Old Testament and the plight of the Pilgrims follows, as Bradford speaks of the “hand of the oppressour,” a likely reference to both the Egyptians who enslaved the Hebrews and the religious persecutors of the Pilgrims. With this phrase, Bradford again conjures the images of Moses leading his followers in the “deserte willdernes,” here equated with the English arrival in the wilds of Cape Cod.

In his work, Bradford also recounts civil matters. These excerpts contain passages covering the decision to draft and sign the Mayflower Compact, widely considered one of the early inspirations for later US political principles such as consent of the governed and the social contract. Unlike the more philosophical notions of good government promulgated by the framers of the US Constitution and other national founding documents, however, the Mayflower Compact was an agreement born largely of necessity. The strangers made up nearly half of the passengers, and among their number was the Mayflower’s governor, Christopher Martin. Martin had long clashed with Pilgrim leaders. The group’s financial backers had named him a purchasing agent, and in this role, he shared the responsibility for acquiring needed supplies for the lengthy voyage. Martin, however, had refused to work with the Pilgrim organizers, causing chief organizer Robert Cushman to complain about the tensions among them during the summer of 1620. Certainly, Martin thought poorly of the Pilgrims and treated them with little respect in the months before the journey. Documentary evidence records that Cushman continued to fret over Martin’s insults and unwillingness to work with the Pilgrims, so much so that the Pilgrim leader began to worry that the settlement was doomed to failure over the divisions between the groups and their inadequate provisioning for what was expected to be a difficult first several months of settlement.

Matters worsened as the voyage at last began. The structural problems of the Pilgrims’ second ship, the Speedwell, caused the party to stop for repairs not long after departing Southampton, England. The ship was eventually abandoned, and the passengers who elected to continue the voyage—the pessimistic Cushman was not among them—were forced to crowd onto the Mayflower. The last-minute Pilgrim defections meant that they now comprised just half of the ship’s passengers, and the ship swap meant that they fell under the governorship of the unpleasant Martin. The rift grew during the long and difficult journey across the ocean, so much so that by the time they landed Bradford noted that some of the strangers were making “discontented and mutinous speeches” in which they announced their intention to break away from the Pilgrim group and “use their owne libertie.” The strangers, Bradford notes, justified this decision by the ship’s distance from its intended arrival point in Virginia, for which the group had initially received a patent to settle from the Virginia Company. Because they instead landed in New England, the strangers claimed that “none had power to command them.”

Others among the strangers, particularly those with close ties to the financial backers and thus a more vested interest in the success of the enterprise, joined with the Pilgrims to agree that dividing their limited ranks was a recipe for overall disaster. Thus, the disparate passengers agreed to form a united bond in the hopes of ensuring their mutual survival through the difficult period ahead. Although the Pilgrims were a religious group, the strangers were decidedly not; it is therefore unsurprising that the agreed-upon Mayflower Compact was secular in nature. Historians have also noted that the decision to form a secular “civill body politick” may have reflected the Pilgrims’ long tenure in the Netherlands, where the state rather than the church controlled institutions such as marriage, as well as their experiences with state-sponsored religious persecution in England.

The local government formed by the agreement was not an especially radical one. Bradford notes that the group affirmed their status as “loyall subjects of our dread soveraigne.” The document also emphasized the importance of the success of the community above the power of any one person or group, with signers affirming their “due submission and obediente” to the overall good of the colony and agreeing to abide by the “lawes, ordinances, act, constitutions, and offices” determined by the local government. The document also reflected the church covenants typically used by Pilgrim congregations, which allowed male members to elect their religious leaders. Nearly all of the adult males on the Mayflower signed the document, although Bradford does not reproduce their names. He does, however, go on to note that the assembled signatories elected John Carver, the remaining Pilgrim organizer of the journey, as the colony’s new governor; this likely reflected the Pilgrims’ great desire to prevent Martin from becoming the head of their religious colony.

Yet this covenant did not assure the overall success of the colony, despite their best intentions. Bradford acknowledges that the Mayflower Compact was not perfect, and that “some discontents and murmurings” continued to plague the group as they began their settlement. He praises the recently elected Carver for his efforts to hold the group together, although the governor fell victim to the harsh winter that Bradford baldly states halved the surviving Mayflower passengers. This group did not include Bradford’s own wife, who had drowned in what scholars have speculated was a suicide while the ship sought a place for a permanent settlement. Although Bradford does not mention this event in his history, his sorrow at the event surely colored his interpretation of the surrounding times.

These times, Bradford claims, were inordinately difficult ones that the group survived only through the intervention of a handful of healthy people acting under the divine influence of God. The difficulties of the journey had weakened many of the travelers, leaving them susceptible to the cold weather and the spread of disease brought on at least in part by inadequate nutrition; Bradford attributes that the relative health of the few who were spared illness to the hand of God, who “so upheld these persons” to care for their companions. Bradford, who adhered to the Christian belief that those who had achieved salvation such as the Pilgrims would flourish in the afterlife, suggested that even those who died had received their proper reward in heaven.

Bradford draws a sharp contrast between those Pilgrims who “willingly and cherfully” cared for their sickened companions and those sailors who Bradford saw as selfishly refusing to help their ersatz community. In recounting a “remarkable passage” in which a sailor refused to share a small quantity of beer with an ill colonist and then the crew themselves rapidly began to fall ill, Bradford emphasizes the potential punishments that could befall those who did not adhere to the Pilgrim value of community that he himself so treasured. The efforts of the community changed some of the sailors’ minds. Bradford tells that the captain rapidly saw the error of his ways by offering to “send for beer” for those ill people who required it, even if the captain himself “drunke water homward bound.” Another crew member who had looked down on the Pilgrims proclaimed the value of their work to “shew your love like Christians indeed” after receiving care from some Pilgrims still abroad the ship. Other crew members resisted the call to engage in the community spirit that Bradford hailed and paid the price. Bradford describes one sailor who promised to name another his heir if he helped him while he was sick. The presumed heir did so but was greatly angered when the sick man did not die quickly enough and then refused to continue to feed him, causing the invalid to die promptly. Such examples were certainly intended to illustrate the nobility of the Pilgrims and their community, which Bradford had, by the time of writing, led as governor for many years.

Throughout Of Plymouth Plantation Bradford seems to be addressing an intended historical audience. The gap between composition and publication makes the exact audience that Bradford had in mind somewhat unclear, however. He writes of himself and his fellow Pilgrims objectively, coloring events somewhat with his own interpretation but not overly aggrandizing his own contributions to the Plymouth Colony. This may suggest that Bradford intended the history to stand as an enduring record rather than as a personal exercise. Scholars have proposed a number of potential intended audiences, ranging from members of the Pilgrims’ congregation that remained in the Netherlands to the younger generation of Plymouth colonists to fellow New Englanders living in the nearby Massachusetts Bay Colony.

The language of the Bible has been identified as an influence on Bradford’s rhetorical style. Although the complexity of the archaic language employed in the original seventeenth-century manuscript might intimidate the modern reader, historians and literary scholars alike have praised Bradford’s writing for its simple, direct style as well as for its author’s humor and personal touches. Many scholars have noted the rhetorical connections between Bradford’s text and the style of the Geneva Bible, a Protestant Bible commonly used before the creation of the King James Version.

Throughout the work, Bradford held true to the style of Pilgrim historical writing that sought to show the divine hand of Providence in shaping earthly events. Yet he also showed in other sections of the history a clear awareness of the influence of the acts of humans upon their own existence. By the end of the complete work, Bradford has begun to ruminate on the failures of the Pilgrims to create a colony that lived up to the mission set to them by God. Of Plymouth Plantation thus provides opportunities for not just historical consideration of the events surrounding the settlement of the first New England colony, but also for examining the motives and beliefs of one of its leading members.

Bibliography

Bercovitch, Sacvan, ed. Typology and Early American Literature. Amherst: U of Massachusetts P, 1972. Print.

Bradford, William. Bradford’s History of the Plymouth Settlement, 1608–1650. Ed. Harold Paget. New York: McBride, 1909. Print.

Bremer, Francis J. The Puritan Experiment: New England Society from Bradford to Edwards. New York: St. Martin’s, 1976. Print.

Donegan, Kathleen. “‘As Dying, Yet Behold We Live’: Catastrophe and Interiority in Bradford’s Of Plymouth Plantation.” Early American Literature 37.1 (2002): 9–37. Print.

Heimert, Alan, and Andrew Delbanco, eds. The Puritans in America: A Narrative Anthology. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1985. Print.

Kelso, Dorothy Honiss. “William Bradford.” Pilgrim Hall Museum. Pilgrim Hall Museum, 18 May 2005. Web. 4 June 2012.

Philbrick, Nathaniel. Mayflower: A Story of Courage, Community, and War. New York: Penguin, 2006. Print.

“Pilgrim Patents: The 1621 Second Peirce Patent and the 1630 Bradford Patent.” Pilgrim Hall Museum. Pilgrim Hall Museum, 18 May 2005. Web. 4 June 2012.

Read, David. “Silent Partners: Historical Representation in William Bradford’s Of Plymouth Plantation.” Early America 33.3 (1998): 291–314.Print.

Schmidt, Gary D. William Bradford: Plymouth’s Faithful Pilgrim. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1999. Print.

Smith, Bradford. Bradford of Plymouth. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1951. Print.

Willison, George F. Saints and Strangers. New York: Reynal, 1945. Print.