Analysis: Speech Against the Kansas-Nebraska Act

Date: October 16, 1854

Author: Lincoln, Abraham

Genre: speech

Summary Overview

In 1848, Abraham Lincoln dropped out of politics. However, when Illinois Senator Stephen A. Douglas co-sponsored the Kansas-Nebraska Act with Southern Democratic senators, and it passed, Lincoln felt he could no longer remain quiet. During the fall of 1854, he made three speeches against the Act, with the definitive one being made in Peoria, Illinois. Lincoln spoke out not only against the Kansas-Nebraska Act, but also against the institution of slavery. Lincoln believed that slavery could not be justified. In addition, he thought the Act went against the true beliefs of the Founding Fathers, and the pattern of Congressional action since that time. He accused Douglas of misreading history and sought to have the Act repealed as a first step toward ending slavery.

Document Analysis

Speaking in Peoria on October 16th, 1854, Abraham Lincoln presented his opposition to the Kansas-Nebraska Act through a history lesson, with a political analysis of the trends which had taken place. In addition, Lincoln responded to some of the arguments for allowing the slavery option within Kansas and Nebraska. Lincoln proceeded to address the morality of slavery and the implications of the views of the proponents of slavery which included looking at slaves as only property, not as human beings. Finally, Lincoln gave his thoughts on what the present and future implications of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the underlying philosophy, were having and would have on the United States, as opposed to what had been the trends in the United States prior to 1854. In his closing remarks, Lincoln spoke to some of the points which Douglas had been making regarding the law and its impact on the nation. This speech was an ambitious attempt to speak to virtually all the issues. Since Lincoln spoke for three hours, he was able to cover quite a bit.

Lincoln began by making it clear that he was focusing on the spread of slavery, rather than on slavery already in place. However, some of his arguments did apply to the South as well as to any westward spread of slavery. Examining the historical portions of the speech, Lincoln began with the Articles of Confederation and journeyed to 1854. Lincoln lifted up Thomas Jefferson as the key leader in the opening phases of the nation and in the move to limit slavery. Since Jefferson was a southern slave owner, Lincoln believed Jefferson would not have been on the liberal end of the pro-slavery/anti-slavery spectrum. For Lincoln, Jefferson was the key to understanding the intent of the Founding Fathers. The transition from the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution was a transition from a weak, consultative national council to a unified nation with a true central government. The fact that Jefferson, as the period under the Articles of Confederation drew to a close, pushed the states to relinquish claims to vast tracts of land in the west was important. It was important in that as part of this, Jefferson sponsored the Northwest Territory Ordinance in 1787 (reaffirmed by Congress in 1789) which included a provision that slavery would be excluded from this area, an area which included land which previously had been claimed by the slave state of Virginia. Lincoln saw this as the first step by the nation to limit slavery. He pointed to the fact that as president, Jefferson signed the law stopping the importation of slaves from Africa, which was passed in early 1807, even though it could not go into effect until 1808.

Lincoln then went on to outline what he, and many others, saw as a continual movement by the national government to, as much as possible, limit the expansion of slavery outside the southern territories of the United States east of the Mississippi River. He discussed the Louisiana Purchase, an area which had slavery under French rule prior to the 1803 purchase by the United States. Accepting that as a given. Lincoln saw the Missouri Compromise of 1820 as step to limit slavery by allowing Missouri to be a slave state, but after that only allowing states composed of territory south of the main part of the southern border of Missouri to come into the Union as slave states.

Toward the end of the speech, Lincoln listed several laws which had been passed by Congress to limit the slave trade and the participation of Americans in the international slave trade. Chronologically, the last event mentioned by Lincoln was the Compromise of 1850. As was the general sentiment at the time, Lincoln saw this as another attempt to settle the issue of slavery. He listed the various aspects of the bills passed as part of the Compromise. For Lincoln, it was another successful attempt to limit slavery, as the borders of the slave state of Texas were pushed much farther east than Texas had claimed, California was a free state, and the area south of the line drawn by the Missouri Compromise (basically the territory of New Mexico) was given the choice of being free or slave. On the other side, the territory of Utah also had the freedom to choose free or slave, but since the founders of the Church of Latter Day Saints (Mormons) had generally been against slavery, few people thought it would ever vote to endorse slavery. However, it was this last point, Utah being free to choose, which was used by Douglas and others to push for a change to the Missouri Compromise. They argued that since Utah Territory was essentially north of the line drawn in the Missouri Compromise, it was necessary to allow Kansas and Nebraska to also have a choice regarding slavery, so that the political possibilities in the various territories would be the same. Lincoln rejected this, saying that if Congress had intended to repeal the Missouri Compromise with the Compromise of 1850, they would have included that in the law.

Using several arguments, Lincoln totally rejected the idea that allowing Utah the right to vote on slavery mandated such a possibility in Kansas or Nebraska. Among these argument was that he did not accept the allegation that the majority of people in the United States wanted the Missouri Compromise repealed. In the first instance, he stated, allowing Utah to vote on slavery was part of a package, with California as a free state, and decreasing the area claimed by Texas as payment. As regarded Kansas and Nebraska, referring to allowing a vote, Lincoln said, “If you wish the thing again, pay again.” Continuing with political arguments, Lincoln not only saw the Act as giving away free territory to slave owners and Southern leaders, but also resulting in increased unjust conditions within the Congress. Those advocating the Kansas-Nebraska Act pushed the idea of self-government. However for Lincoln, the fact that the slaveholding states had approximately twenty extra representatives as a result of counting three-fifths of each slave toward the number needed for a House seat, rather than just counting the number of free people. If Kansas or Nebraska came in as a slave state, Lincoln saw this as giving them extra power, just as the South had in the then current system of government.

Many who tried to sit on the fence on this issue believed that Kansas and Nebraska were not suited for slave plantations, and therefore in the end it would not be an issue. Lincoln presented the fact that more than “one-fourth of all the slaves in the nation” were north of the line drawn by the Missouri Compromise. He informed the people that in the counties of Missouri which bordered on what would become Kansas or Nebraska, there were proportionately more slaves per white person than in most parts of the state. Thus Lincoln did not believe that climate would prohibit slavery moving into this region. In addition, looking to the second decade of the nineteenth century, when slavery was permitted in the Missouri territory and restricted in the Illinois territory, the number of slaves increased substantially in Missouri, while decreasing to almost none in Illinois. To Lincoln, this affirmed that the legality of slavery encouraged slave owners to move into new areas with their slaves. Economically, Lincoln saw the territories which would become states as places where “poor people go to and better their condition.” This would not be possible, according to Lincoln, if slavery were allowed in the territories.

Obviously, Lincoln believed all of the other arguments were of value. They did answer some of the reasons why Stephen Douglas, and other supporters of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, said they had worked to pass the bill. However, for Lincoln there was another, even more important reason to oppose the Act. This had to do with the institution of slavery itself. It was true that while Lincoln opposed slavery, he had no idea what to do with the African Americans if they were set free. While he had previously given some assistance to those who wanted to send them back to Africa, Lincoln recognized that if they sent the ex-slaves there, “they would perish in the next ten days” after landing. On the other hand, to give them freedom in the United States would, in Lincoln’s mind, result in the white population keeping the former slaves “among us as underlings.” This also was unacceptable, as was full equality if the thousands of slaves were freed. This was why Lincoln focused on keeping slavery from spreading. However, even with this problem of what would happen if all the slaves were freed, Lincoln still advocated an end to the institution. Using Douglas’ argument for self-government, Lincoln raised how self-government worked for slaves. Lincoln affirmed, “The doctrine of self government is right—absolutely and eternally right.” Thus, Lincoln stated the key issue in the debate over self-government; that it “depends upon whether a negro is not or is a man. If he is not a man, why in that case… But if the negro is a man, is it not to that extent, a total destruction of self-government, to say that he too shall not govern himself?” In Lincoln’s mind, for whites to govern blacks, without their consent, was “despotism.” Continuing, Lincoln stated “if the negro is a man, why then my ancient faith teaches me that ‘all men are created equal;’ and that there can be no moral right in connection with one man’s making a slave of another.” This was what is at the heart of Lincoln’s argument against slavery and its extension into new territories.

Lincoln closed with an attack against Douglas for not understanding “that the negro is a human.” Throughout the speech, Lincoln asserted that while some saw slaves as property no different from livestock or various products, this was not the case. Lincoln accepted the charge leveled at him by Douglas that he was being somewhat inconsistent by not pushing for the end of slavery in the Southern states as well as in the territories. However, Lincoln did not see ending slavery where it was entrenched as the issue for that day. He believed the time for addressing that lay in the future. What Lincoln was addressing was the proposition that the area where slavery was allowed should not be extended. Lincoln’s answer was a strong no, it should not be extended, and that the Kansas-Nebraska Act had been a bad piece of legislation and would be seen as a bad, contentious law, which would only increase civil strife between the North and the South.

Bibliography

Monroe, R. D. The Kansas-Nebraska Act and the Rise of the Republican Party, 1854–56. DeKalb: Northern Illinois U – Abraham Lincoln Historical Digitization Project, 2000. Web 4 Oct 2013

National Park Service. Peoria Speech, October 16, 1854. Washington: Department of the Interior, 2013. Web. 30 Sept 2013.

Sandburg, Carl. Abraham Lincoln: The Prairie Years and the War Years. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1954. Print.