Categorical imperative
The categorical imperative is a foundational concept in moral philosophy developed by Immanuel Kant, an influential thinker of the 18th century. Kant proposed this ethical framework as a means to establish a universal moral law that is accessible and applicable to all rational beings. He articulated the categorical imperative in two primary forms: first, that individuals should act according to maxims they would wish to become universal laws; and second, that people should treat others as ends in themselves and never merely as means to an end. This underscores the intrinsic value of each human being and emphasizes the immorality of using others for personal gain, such as through manipulation or coercion.
Kant’s categorical imperative aims to provide a consistent moral standard that transcends subjective circumstances, suggesting that ethical judgments should be made based on universal applicability. Although Kant's ideas have been influential, contemporary critiques highlight the challenge of applying such a universal principle to complex moral situations, suggesting it may overlook individual moral responsibilities. The categorical imperative remains relevant today, influencing discussions around ethics in technology, environmental concerns, and artificial intelligence. This enduring debate illustrates the complexity of moral reasoning and the balance between universal principles and personal ethics.
On this Page
Categorical imperative
Categorical imperative is a theory of moral philosophy put forth by Immanuel Kant, an influential eighteenth-century thinker. One of Kant’s best-known theories, the categorical imperative was the philosopher’s attempt to create a moral law that was both easily understood and applicable to most people. He described his categorical imperative on two occasions. The first time he described his theory, Kant argued that anyone willing to apply a rule to themselves must also be willing to apply that rule to everyone else. The same is true of breaking rules. For example, if someone is willing to lie in a specific situation, they should be willing to let everyone lie in that situation.
The second time Kant discussed his categorical imperative, he argued that humans should never be treated as the means to an end. He argued that humans have an intrinsic value and should not be used as a means to achieve someone else’s goal. According to Kant, any act that uses another person is immoral.
Background
Immanuel Kant was born in 1724 in Germany to Johann Georg Cant and Anna Regina Cant. Kant later changed the spelling of his surname to better reflect German pronunciation. He grew up Protestant and studied Latin at a Protestant school as a child. At sixteen years old, Kant entered the University of Königsberg. While in attendance, Kant studied mathematics and philosophy. When his father died, Kant left the university and began work as a private tutor.
Kant later returned to the University of Königsberg and earned a doctorate degree in philosophy. The philosopher immediately began working as a lecturer at the university. He published numerous notable philosophical works during this period, including the essays “The False Subtlety of the Four Syllogistic Figures Proved” in 1762 and “Attempt to Introduce the Concept of Negative Magnitudes into Philosophy” in 1763. He published the book Observations on the Feelings of the Beautiful and the Sublime in 1764.
Kant refrained from publishing during the 1770s. Instead, the philosopher focused on his work as a professor. However, in 1781, Kant published one of his most influential works, Critique of Pure Reason. In this work, Kant attempted to reach a balance between rationalism and empiricism, two of the prevailing philosophies of his time.
In the book, he made a distinction between a priori knowledge, meaning knowledge gained independent of experience, and a posteriori knowledge, meaning knowledge gained from experience. Kant argued that mathematics and science are a priori knowledge, and that most judgements and observations are a posteriori knowledge.
Kant followed Critique of Pure Reason with two other works in the same vein, Critique of Practical Reason in 1788 and Critique of Judgement in 1790. Collectively, the critiques went on to become some of Kant’s most famous and influential works. Although Kant’s health began to decline after this period, he continued to write and publish philosophical works.
The philosopher continued to work as a professor until 1797. Health issues related to aging, including blindness and memory loss, gradually forced Kant to retire. He passed away on February 12, 1804.
Overview
Kant is famous for his study of ethics. Unlike many philosophers of his time, Kant was certain that it was possible to develop a moral system based on reason alone. He thought that important moral tenets would apply to all intelligent beings and that any rational human would be able to discern these tenets for themselves. For this reason, Kant rejected the idea that people needed to look to God or other authority figures for help discerning their moral code.
Kant believed that humans had a duty to perform good acts. However, like many philosophers, he was unable to write a definition of an act that would be interpreted as “good” at all times. Instead, Kant declared that all good acts must contain the will to do good.
The categorical imperative was an important part of Kant’s studies on goodness, duty, and ethics. Kant intended his categorical imperative to be the one rule that was always true. Other moral rules were circumstantial, had exceptions, or could sometimes be argued against.
Kant’s categorical imperative was discussed twice in his works. Each time, it was described in a slightly different manner. The first time, Kant stated that people should “always act in such a way that you can also will that the maxim of your action should become a universal law.” This means that Kant believed people should always act in a manner they think would be appropriate for everyone to act. He argued that this should be applied to the moral rules of society and religions, as well as the personal ethical codes of individuals. If an individual is willing to break a moral rule in a specific circumstance, they should be willing to allow everyone to do the same in that same circumstance. Additionally, if someone is willing to forbid another person from performing an act, they should be willing to forbid all people from performing that act.
The second time Kant discussed his categorical imperative, he explained it differently. This time, Kant stated, “act so that you treat humanity, both in your own person and in that of another, always as an end and never merely as means.” According to this variant of the rule, people should never be treated as a means to an end. Human beings have intrinsic, natural value and as such, should not be used to achieve a personal goal of someone else. This includes coercion, deception, and manipulation. Although these rules appear different, Kant insisted that they were the same rule expressed in different ways.
Kant’s categorical imperative can be applied to contemporary concepts as well. For example, the theory can help establish frameworks for ethical issues in technology, such as data privacy. The principle can also be applied to environmental ethics through understanding that it is morally wrong to harm the environment. Categorical imperative can also be applied to ethical issues surrounding Artificial Intelligence. Modern critics argue the idea is too universal and ignores the importance of personal moral responsibility.
Bibliography
“About Duty-Based Ethics.” BBC, www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/introduction/duty‗1.shtml. Accessed 10 Dec. 2024.
Allen, Anita L. "Protecting One’s Own Privacy in a Big Data Economy." Harvard Law Review, Dec. 2016, harvardlawreview.org/forum/vol-130/protecting-ones-own-privacy-in-a-big-data-economy/. Accessed 10 Dec. 2024.
Clapp, Matthew. “Kant's Imperative: A Modern Ethical Compass.” Nautis, 2 July 2023, www.nautis.com/kants-imperative-modern-ethical-compass. Accessed 10 Dec. 2024.
Pecorino, Philip A. “The Categorical Imperative.” Queensborough Community College, www.qcc.cuny.edu/SocialSciences/ppecorino/MEDICAL‗ETHICS‗TEXT/Chapter‗2‗Ethical‗Traditions/Categorical‗Imperative.htm. Accessed 10 Dec. 2024.
“Immanuel Kant.” Philosophers.co.uk, www.philosophers.co.uk/immanuel-kant.html. Accessed 10 Dec. 2024.
“Kant’s Moral Philosophy.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 21 Jan. 2022, plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral. Accessed 10 Dec. 2024.
McKnight, Lisa. “Immanuel Kant and ‘The Categorical Imperative’ for Dummies.” Owlcation, 19 Nov. 2023, owlcation.com/humanities/Immanuel-Kant-and-The-Categorical-Imperative. Accessed 10 Dec. 2024.