Charles III Gains the Spanish Throne
Charles III of Spain ascended to the throne in 1759, inheriting a declining empire poised for renewal. As the fourth monarch of the Bourbon Dynasty, he built upon the centralization and modernization reforms initiated by his predecessors. Charles III was known for his decisive governance, working closely with a cadre of advisors, including Jerónimo Grimaldi and Leopoldo di Gregorio Squillace, to implement significant administrative changes. His reign saw efforts to reduce the power of the aristocracy and the Catholic Church while addressing agricultural inefficiencies that led to social unrest.
Despite a bold attempt to reform, including the controversial Esquilache Revolt of 1766, resistance from entrenched elites hampered his initiatives. His involvement in the Seven Years' War initially brought humiliation to Spain, but his later alliance with France during the American Revolutionary War marked a resurgence in Spanish influence. Charles III's legacy is characterized by attempts at modernization amid significant opposition and challenges, with his reforms laying groundwork for future developments in the late 18th century. Ultimately, his reign established him as a notable figure among the Spanish Bourbons, even as the turmoil of the coming French Revolution loomed on the horizon.
On this Page
Charles III Gains the Spanish Throne
Date 1759
Under King Charles III, Spain reached the high point of its “enlightened absolutist” monarchy. Charles initiated far-reaching social, political, and economic reforms, using his nearly absolute power to improve his society and the lives of its people.
Locale Spain
Key Figures
Charles III (1716-1788), king of Spain, r. 1759-1788Count of Floridablanca (José Moñino y Redondo; 1728-1808), Spanish secretary of state for foreign affairs, 1776-1792Pedro Rodríguez de Campomanes (1723-1802), Charles’s chief economic adviserCount of Aranda (Pedro Pablo Abarca de Bolea; 1719-1798), president of the Council of CastileJerónimo Grimaldi (1720-1786), Spanish secretary of state for foreign affairs, 1761-1776Leopoldo di Gregorio Squillace (Esquilache; d.1785), Spanish minister of finance and war until 1766
Summary of Event
When Charles III succeeded his half brother Ferdinand VI to the throne of Spain in 1759, he inherited an empire that had been arrested in the process of decline and was once again becoming a major power in European affairs. He was the fourth monarch of the new Bourbon Dynasty, which had succeeded to the throne after the death of the Habsburg Charles II (1700) and the resulting War of the Spanish Succession .
![Portrait of Charles III of Spain Anton Raphael Mengs [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons 89158565-51255.jpg](https://imageserver.ebscohost.com/img/embimages/ers/sp/embedded/89158565-51255.jpg?ephost1=dGJyMNHX8kSepq84xNvgOLCmsE2epq5Srqa4SK6WxWXS)
His father, Philip V, and his two half brothers, Louis I and Ferdinand VI, had begun and continued a policy of centralization and modernization that emulated Bourbon reforms in France. Charles inherited these reforms, but he also built upon them more effectively than any of the other Bourbons. In so doing, he had two initial advantages: His predecessors had laid the foundations for reform; and Charles also had experience in governing. Through the machinations of his mother, Isabella Farnese, he had been successively duke of Parma and Tuscany and then king of the Two Sicilies. Thus, he came to Spain prepared to rule.
Historians have portrayed Charles as Spain’s enlightened despot. Certainly he aimed to establish royal absolutism and chose ministers who were familiar with the enlightened currents of the time. Yet Charles himself had little interest in intellectual matters, read almost nothing, and preferred hunting to all other activities. What distinguished him from his predecessors was a willingness to rule decisively after consultation with his ministers. Administrative centralization had been established when Charles came to the throne, but he raised it to its most efficient level. The old system of councils was replaced by well-organized ministries run by career bureaucrats, completely subservient to the king.
The first phase of Charles’s reign lasted until 1766 and constituted the most radical attempt at reform. Bellicose by nature, Charles plunged Spain into the Seven Years’ War in 1762, with disastrous results. Allied with his French Bourbon cousins, Charles suffered a humiliating defeat, made worse by the British capture of Havana and Manila. Although these ports were returned to Spain by the Peace of Paris, the war showed how exposed the Spanish empire was to British seapower. Imperial defenses needed expensive reforms. Meanwhile, Charles relied heavily on two Italian advisers: Jerónimo Grimaldi, who advised the king on foreign affairs, and Leopoldo di Gregorio Squillace (Hispanicized as Esquilache), who oversaw finances and the military. Along with the king’s chief economic expert, Pedro Rodríguez Campomanes, they attempted to impose domestic reform on Spain. They tried to reduce aristocratic power by using commoners to staff the government and worked to increase the tax burden upon the nobility and the Catholic Church. A great problem for Spain, entailed estates and mortmain concentrated land in the hands of the aristocracy and clergy. The result was inefficient agriculture and high grain prices. In turn these caused social tension for the growing Spanish population. Campomanes, a Physiocrat who believed that a nation’s wealth depended on wise use of its land, proposed reforms to redistribute land and thus create more small farmers. He also tried to deregulate the grain trade.
Such proposals heightened opposition among entrenched power groups. Resistance to the reforms, resentment of Charles’s foreign advisers, and the crisis provoked by grain shortages led to a serious tumult in Madrid in March, 1766, the so-called Esquilache Revolt, which also spread to other cities. Alarmed by the violence, Charles fled Madrid, removed Squillace, but asserted royal authority in 1767 by exiling the Jesuits, reported to have helped foment the revolt. The Inquisition, that most feared of Spanish institutions, found its powers curtailed, and few cases were tried in its courts. Grimaldi retained his influence in foreign affairs, whereas domestic policy fell to the count of Aranda, president of the Council of Castile, and Campomanes, who continued to push for agrarian reform.
More than three-quarters of the arable land of Spain was held by a few families or corporations. Much of this property was still controlled by the Mesta, the sheep-owners’ guild, whose members allowed their sheep to graze on land desperately needed for agrarian production. Appointed head of the Mesta, Campomanes broke its hold on the land and allowed villages to enclose their lands to protect them from the sheep. He ordered the sale of uncultivated land and the division of some communal properties among the townspeople. He forced the sale of idle church lands and reduced the number of monastic establishments. He encouraged the immigration of foreign peasants to show Spaniards how to make the land produce more, and of foreign artisans to stimulate Spanish industry; he also established an agricultural school. Although many of these reforms, particularly forced sale of land, were not seen through to completion, Campomanes laid the foundation for nineteenth century reforms.
The final phase of Charles’s reign lasted from 1776 to 1788. By that time, Grimaldi and Aranda had both fallen into disfavor, and the king turned administration of the government over to the count of Floridablanca. Almost immediately, Floridablanca confronted war with the British. Eager to avenge Spain’s defeat during the Seven Years’ War, Charles joined France in 1778 to aid the North American colonists in their rebellion against George III. The successful outcome resulted in part from naval and military reforms carried out earlier by Aranda.
Floridablanca also worked to strengthen Spain’s economy. Textile factories were modernized in Catalonia, thereby making the region productive again; canals and roads were constructed; tax collection was improved; and the Spanish sales tax was lowered to a reasonable level. To increase commerce with Spain’s American colonies, the crown modified its mercantilist policies and decreed intra-imperial free trade in 1778. This enabled all Spanish ports to trade directly with all of Spanish America except Mexico and Venezuela, which were finally added in 1789. The upsurge in American silver production helped imperial commerce prosper. Modernization of universities and schools fostered learning, as did the establishment of economic societies that helped spread “enlightened” ideas and technology.
Significance
Charles was the greatest of the eighteenth century Spanish Bourbons. He and his ministers attempted to modernize and strengthen Spain. Nevertheless, opposition from entrenched power groups such as the aristocracy and the clergy checked the reformers. Nor did the crown push through truly effective land or tax reforms. Those waited for later generations. Charles’s legacy was also undermined by his incompetent son, Charles IV, who succeeded to the throne in 1788; and by the onset of the French Revolution, which not only threw Spain in turmoil but also discredited the modernizers.
Bibliography
Herr, Richard. The Eighteenth Century Revolution in Spain. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1958. The standard intellectual history of Spain during the eighteenth century, it portrays an enlightenment imposed on the nation by the court and its ministers.
‗‗‗‗‗‗‗. Rural Change and Royal Finances in Spain at the End of the Old Regime. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989. A massively detailed study of royal policy during the reigns of Charles III and Charles IV regarding agrarian reform and the partially successful attempt to invigorate agriculture by disentailing ecclesiastical and aristocratic estates.
Hull, Anthony H. Charles III and the Revival of Spain. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America, 1980. Provides good background on Charles’s Italian career. Holds that his greatest virtue as king of Spain was his willingness to use his power pragmatically to further reform.
Kuethe, Allen J. “Towards a Periodization of the Reforms of Charles III.” In Iberian Colonies, New World Societies: Essays in Memory of Charles Gibson, edited by Richard L. Garner and William B. Taylor. Private printing, 1985. Provides a chronological framework for understanding how reform of the Spanish empire unfolded during the reign of Charles III. Emphasizes his determination to take revenge on the British.
Lynch, John. Bourbon Spain, 1700-1808. Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell, 1989. The best overall treatment in English of Spain and its empire in the eighteenth century, giving Charles less credit for policy and reform initiatives than is customary.
Noel, Charles C. “Charles III of Spain.” In Enlightened Absolutism: Reform and Reformers in Later Eighteenth-Century Europe, edited by H. M. Scott. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990. Portrays Charles as a leading example of a monarchy sympathetic to the intellectual currents of the eighteenth century and willing to support reforms to modernize his realms.
Stein, Stanley J., and Barbara H. Stein. Apogee of Empire: Spain and New Spain in the Age of Charles III, 1759-1789. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003. Examines Charles’s attempts to reform Spain’s political, economic, and social institutions, and to modernize Spain’s relationship with its colonies. The authors conclude that Charles’s efforts ultimately failed, and Spain was ill prepared for future upheaval in Europe and its colonies.