Council of Nicaea

Related civilizations: Imperial Rome, Byzantine Empire.

Date: 325 c.e.

Locale: Nicaea (now İznik, Turkey)

Council of Nicaea

Early Christianity had been struggling to identify the relationships between the figures in the Godhead (what would later become known as the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) for a couple of centuries. One side tended to emphasize the preeminence of God, making the Son a lesser deity. The other side insisted on equality between the figures, but often blurred the distinctions. Arius, a presbyter in Alexandria, insisted that the Son was not of the same substance as deity (homoousios), but rather only a similar substance (homoiousios). Deposed for heresy, he rallied many supporters, and the schism threatened the unity of the entire Eastern church. Constantine the Great, recent conqueror of the eastern half of the empire, wanted unity in the church, so he called for a council of bishops to resolve the dispute.

89402551-106500.jpg89402551-106499.jpg

In 325 c.e. at Nicaea (ni-SEE-uh), which means “victory” and demonstrates a desire to bring victory to the dispute, about three hundred bishops of the church met to discuss the theological issues. Saint Athanasius of Alexandria, another presbyter from Alexandria, managed to convince Emperor Constantine that Arius was wrong, and most bishops were unwilling to offend the new and powerful emperor. Thus, the overwhelming majority of the bishops at the council voted in favor of the Nicene Creed, which stated that the Son was of the same substance (homoousios) as the Father.

Although Arianism was condemned and the Nicene position became the orthodox position in the church, Arianism continued to plague the church for another half century. This brought a significant amount of trouble to the church, both theologically and politically.

Bibliography

Arnold, Marvin M. Nicaea and the Nicene Council of a.d. 325. Washington, Mich.: Arno, 1987.

Dudley, Dean. History of the First Council of Nice. New York: ECA Associates, 1990.