French and Indian War: the Albany Congress Convenes

French and Indian War: the Albany Congress Convenes

Several times during the 17th and 18th centuries the British colonies in North America, while retaining their separate identities and governments, joined together for reasons of mutual defense and assistance. For example, as early as 1643 Massachusetts Bay, Plymouth, Connecticut, and New Haven formed the New England Confederation, an association empowered to declare war, settle intercolonial problems, and deal with Native American affairs. Other ventures in intercolonial cooperation were against the backdrop of the worldwide struggle for empire between England and France. In North America, conflicts related to this rivalry extended, off and on, for three-quarters of a century from 1689 until the Treaty of Paris of 1763.

During King William's War of 1689 to 1697, New York coordinated its defense (in 1690) with that of its neighbors Connecticut and Massachusetts. Governor Benjamin Fletcher of New York suggested that provinces as far away as Virginia provide troops to protect his colony's frontiers. At the time of Queen Anne's War of 1702 to 1713, plans for concerted colonial action were put forth, and during King George's War of 1744 to 1748 a combined force of men from the New England colonies directed a campaign against the French stronghold of Louisbourg on Nova Scotia's Cape Breton Island. Perhaps the most notable attempt of the colonies to work together before the difficult years of the American Revolution was the Albany congress that convened on June 19, 1754, on the eve of the French and Indian War. It was this conflict that would end in 1763 with the ousting of the French from virtually all of North America.

In the early 1750s the possibility of an alliance between the Iroquois and the French posed a great threat to the British colonies in America. Realizing this danger, in the autumn of 1753 the British Board of Trade sought to strengthen the wavering Iroquois loyalty by asking the representatives of Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, New Hampshire and Massachusetts to meet together to settle any difficulties that they might have with the native tribes. When the intercolonial conference convened in Albany, Virginia was preoccupied with its own dealings with the Ohio River valley tribes and thus did not send a representative to the meeting. However, most of the other colonies complied with the British request.

The representatives to the Albany congress included some of the most outstanding leaders of the colonies. Among others, Massachusetts sent Thomas Hutchinson, who had served as speaker of the general court and who was a member of the provincial council. Rhode Island's delegation included its chief justice, Stephen Hopkins, who in 1755 became the colony's governor and later signed the Declaration of Independence. New York was represented by its lieutenant governor, James De Lancey. From Pennsylvania came undoubtedly the most important member, Benjamin Franklin.

A total of 25 colonial delegates met with the 150 Iroquois who attended the Albany congress, and the Iroquois Nation cited serious grievances against the British. In particular, they resented the colonists' (and especially the New Yorkers') abuses of the fur trade and their encroachment on Iroquoian lands. In addition, Chief Hendrick of the Mohawks (one of the tribes in the Iroquois Nation) remarked that from 1751 to 1754 the colonists had neglected the tribes, whereas “the French are a subtle and vigilant people, ever using their utmost endeavors to seduce and bring our people over to them.” Hendrick then went on to deny the colonists' accusations that the Iroquois were permitting the French to occupy their lands. He took the colonies to task for failing to provide adequate defenses for their own borders. Finally, he concluded by charging that certain Albany merchants were involved in trading munitions with the French in Canada.

The Albany delegates responded to each of the Iroquois grievances. Their explanations of the colonists' past behavior and their promises of improved conduct in the future at least superficially satisfied the Iroquois, and in the days following July 5, 1754, they seemed willing to renew their friendship with the British. The Iroquois asked for a prohibition on the sale of rum in their territory, requested that a church be erected at Canojoharie in the Mohawk Valley “to make us Religious and lead better lives,” and warned the British of the dangers of leaving their frontier regions unprotected. Then, on July 9, 1754, the parties concluded their official negotiations, and a few days later the Iroquois returned to their homes with 30 wagonloads of gifts.

Although called for the specific purpose of cementing closer relations with the Iroquois, the Albany congress also considered a much broader issue. On June 24 the question “whether a Union of all the Colonies is not at present absolutely necessary for their security and defense” came before the assembly. A number of the Albany delegates had no authorization from their respective colonies to discuss the possibility of establishing an intercolonial union, but this did not impede their consideration of the matter. The representatives unanimously agreed that a colonial union could best handle the emergency situation created by the threatened alliance between the French and the native tribes, and they then proceeded to examine various plans for setting up the proposed union.

Even before the opening of the Albany congress, Benjamin Franklin had recognized the urgent need for a union of the British colonies. The French had taken possession of the forks of the Ohio River in May 1754. Writing in his Pennsylvania Gazette that month, Franklin noted:

The confidence of the French in this undertaking seems well grounded in the present disunited state of the British colonies, and the extreme difficulty of bringing so many different governments and assemblies to agree to any speedy and effectual measures for our common defence and security, while our enemies have the great advantage of being under one direction, with one council, and one purse.

As early as 1751 Franklin had devised a preliminary plan of union, and he incorporated many of his earlier ideas in the “Short Hints toward a Scheme for Uniting the Northern Colonies,” which he presented to the Albany congress. Franklin's “Short Hints” provided for a supracolonial government to be established by an act of Parliament and to consist of a grand council and a president-general. According to the plan, the assembly of each colony would select at least one member of the council, and the larger colonies would have additional representation in that body proportioned according to the “sums they pay yearly to the General Treasury.” The president-general would be an appointee of the Crown and have the power to veto all of the acts of the grand council. The authority of the grand council and the president-general would be extensive; they would attend to Native American treaties, control the course of British settlement, erect forts, provide soldiers, and in short do “everything…necessary for the defense and support of the Colonies in General, and increasing and extending their settlements, etc.”

The Albany congress also considered plans of union advanced by Richard Peters of Pennsylvania, Thomas Hutchinson of Massachusetts, and Thomas Pownall, the sympathetic freelance observer of colonial defense problems who held important posts in several colonies before his eventual return to England. After their deliberation, the delegates chose Franklin's outline as the basis for the colonial union they deemed necessary. On July 10 the congress prepared the final draft of the “Plan of a Proposed Union.” It called for an act of Parliament to form a union of all British colonies in North America, excepting Nova Scotia and Georgia, in which “each Colony may retain its present constitution.” It also provided for a president-general, appointed by the Crown and having final veto power, and a grand council, whose members would be elected by the colonial assemblies. Finally, it vested in the president-general and grand council the responsibility for Native American affairs and other matters related to the defense of the colonies.

Despite the strong arguments favoring the creation of a colonial union, the plan of a “general Government” of the colonies in America was emphatically rejected by both the colonial assemblies and the British government. In 1754 the Americans believed that a centralized union threatened the individual autonomy of each colony and the British thought that a general government encroached upon the royal prerogative. However, the “Albany Plan of Union,” which provided for a central government whose member colonies would retain their separate identities, foreshadowed other governments in America. Less than three decades later, the Articles of Confederation of 1781 embodied the plan's federal ideas, and in 1787 Federalist thinking provided the basis for the United States Constitution.