Marcelino Menéndez y Pelayo
Marcelino Menéndez y Pelayo was a prominent Spanish scholar, born on November 3, 1856, in Santander, Spain. He displayed remarkable intellectual abilities from a young age, entering the University of Barcelona at just fifteen and publishing significant works on Spanish culture shortly thereafter. By the age of twenty-two, he became a chair of literature at the University of Madrid and was elected to the Spanish Academy in 1880. His major contributions include "La ciencia española," "Historia de los heterodoxos españoles," and "Historia de las ideas estéticas en España," which reflect his strong defense of Catholicism and Spanish cultural traditions.
Menéndez y Pelayo was known for his unique historiographical views, advocating that history and poetry serve similar purposes in revealing universal truths. Over time, he adopted a more liberal perspective while retaining his orthodox Catholic beliefs. He authored several works on Spain's literary and intellectual history, including an extensive examination of the origins of the novel and edited significant collections of Spanish literature. Appointed director of the National Library of Madrid and later the Royal Academy of History, he passed away in 1912. His legacy endures through his clear writing style, scholarly contributions, and a comprehensive edition of his works published posthumously.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Marcelino Menéndez y Pelayo
Scholar
- Born: November 3, 1856
- Birthplace: Santander, Spain
- Died: May 19, 1912
- Place of death: Santander, Spain
Biography
Marcelino Menéndez y Paleyo was born on November 3, 1856, in Santander, Spain. Entering the University of Barcelona in 1871, he astonished his fellow students and teachers with his intelligence and photographic memory. By the age of twenty-one, he had published two books about Spanish culture, and at twenty- two he was appointed chair of literature at the University of Madrid, even though his young age required a special exemption from the Spanish legislature. In 1880, he was appointed a member of the Spanish Academy.
While still in his twenties, Menéndez y Pelayo published his three principle works: La ciencia española (1876-1888, Spanish science), Historia de los heterodoxos españoles (1880-1882, history of Spanish heterodox thinkers), and Historia de las ideas estéticas en España (1883-1891, history of aesthetic ideas in Spain). Like his other writings, these works revealed a committed and sometimes intemperate defender of Catholicism and Spanish traditions. A champion of the ultra- conservative wing of the Church, he argued that the Inquisition had fostered, not hindered, the development of Spanish culture.
In 1883, Menéndez y Pelayo expressed his ideas about historiography when inaugurated president of the Spanish Royal Academy of History. He asserted that Hegel had failed to appreciate the aesthetic character of history, and he took issue with Aristotle’s dictum about poetry being more profound than history. In his view, the functions of the two forms of literature were the same: “to discover the universal in the mundane.” He looked upon the ancient historians as models because of their subjectivity and emphasis on style.
In his later years, Menéndez y Pelayo developed a more liberal viewpoint, although he remained an orthodox Catholic. He published revised editions of his early writings, while also writing numerous works devoted to Spain’s intellectual and literary history, including a four-volume account of the rise of origins of the novel (1905-1915). He also edited the works of Lope de Vega in six volumes (1919-1927) and an exhaustive anthology of Castilian lyrical poets (1890-1906). In 1898, he was appointed director of the National Library of Madrid. In 1909, he became director of the Royal Academy of History. He died in his native city of Santander in 1912 at the age of fifty-six.
Menéndez y Pelayo is praised for his outstanding writing style, clarity of expression, and great erudition. In 1940, the Superior Council of Scientific Researches published an edition of his complete works in thirteen volumes. At a time when many historians focused on military and political history, he took a broad perspective of the discipline, emphasizing the history of culture and ideas.