Müller-Lyer illusion

The Müller-Lyer illusion is an optical illusion in which two lines of the same length are perceived to be of different lengths due to the types of arrows placed at their ends. The arrows of one line point outward, while the arrows of the other point inward. Most people who initially viewed the illusion in the late nineteenth century perceived the latter line to be longer because of these differences. As a result, scientists believed all people were susceptible to the illusion.

rssalemscience-20180108-208-167416.jpg

International research in the 1960s, however, revealed that the perception of the lines' lengths depends on culture. Urban people who live amidst hard geographic lines, such as those of buildings, perceive the illusion's lines differently than tribal people who live in nature. How people perceive the Müller-Lyer illusion, therefore, depends on the setting in which they were raised.

Overview

German sociologist and psychiatrist Franz Carl Müller-Lyer devised the Müller-Lyer illusion in 1889. Most people who viewed the illusion saw the line with the inward-pointing arrows as longer. The addition of perpendicular lines at both ends of each arrowed line, however, showed that the two lines were the same length.

The scientific discussion surrounding the Müller-Lyer illusion focused on the question of why the direction of the arrows determined how people saw the lines. The predominant theory in Müller-Lyer's time and into the mid-twentieth century was that each line represented in viewers' minds two corners of the same wall. The line with the arrows pointing inward was perceived as being the farther corner of the wall.

People generally perceive faraway objects as smaller than they are, but their minds know this is only an illusion. People compensate for this illusion by acknowledging subconsciously that objects in the distance are larger than they appear. Thus, the line with the inward-pointing arrows is perceived as longer. Scientists later asserted that the positions of the arrowheads could appear as though they are adding to the total lengths of the lines and that this is responsible for the success of the illusion.

The scientific consensus on geometric depth perception being responsible for the Müller-Lyer illusion changed in the 1960s. In this period, scientists showed the illusion to different African groups living in grasslands and other natural areas. Many of them immediately saw past the illusion, accurately perceiving the lines as identical in length.

The reason for this disparity in line perception among peoples from different continents was based on cultural differences. Everyone Müller-Lyer had tested, and everyone tested on the illusion into the 1960s, had been educated, urban Westerners who lived in societies with hard-angled buildings and room dimensions. Conversely, the African tribal people lived in nature, where few straight lines exist.

The general scientific conclusion was that the Müller-Lyer illusion works on those who are familiar with perceiving geometric lines according to how far away they are. Meanwhile, those who are not from urban cultures can see instantly that the lines are the same length. Continued studies have attempted to determine whether ethnicity, gender, or age affect one's perception of the illusion's lines. Because the Müller-Lyer illusion plays to the differences in people's visual systems, the illusion is also known as a physiological phenomenon rather than simply an optical illusion.

Bibliography

Alter, Adam. "Are These Lines the Same Height? Your Answer Depends on Where You're From." Popular Science, 20 Mar. 2013, www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-03/are-these-walls-the-same-size-your-answer-depends-on-where-youre-from. Accessed 14 Feb. 2018.

Blom, Jan Dirk. A Dictionary of Hallucinations. Springer Science and Business Media, LLC, 2010, 343.

Choi, Charles Q. "Reality Check: 10 Practical Applications of Illusions." Scientific American, 27 Nov. 2014, www.scientificamerican.com/article/reality-check-10-practical-applications-of-illusions/#. Accessed 14 Feb. 2018.

Costandi, Mo. "How Goalkeepers Can Use an Illusion to Save Penalty Kicks." Guardian, 18 Aug. 2014, www.theguardian.com/science/neurophilosophy/2014/aug/18/muller-lyer-illusion-goalkeeping. Accessed 14 Feb. 2018.

Eysenck, Michael W., and Mark Keane. Cognitive Psychology: A Student's Handbook. Psychology Press, 2000, pp. 56–57.

Garcia-Garibay, Otto B., and Victor de Lafuente. "The Müller-Lyer Illusion as Seen by an Artificial Neural Network." Frontiers, 19 Feb. 2015, www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncom.2015.00021/full. Accessed 14 Feb. 2018.

"Müller-Lyer." Illusions Index, www.illusionsindex.org/ir/mueller-lyer. Accessed 14 Feb. 2018.

Perez-Fabello, Maria Jose and Alfred Campus. "Müller-Lyer Illusion Through Mental Imagery." Current Psychology, vol. 42, 16 Nov. 2022, pp. 29316-29324, doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03979-y. Accessed 17 Nov. 2024.

Schultz, Colin. "Are Optical Illusions Cultural?" Smithsonian.com, 21 Mar. 2013, www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/are-optical-illusions-cultural-6633978/. Accessed 14 Feb. 2018.