Theodore Roosevelt and His Relationship with the Press
Theodore Roosevelt, the 26th president of the United States, had a complex and multifaceted relationship with the press during his time in office from 1901 to 1909. Known for his dynamic personality and strong leadership style, Roosevelt recognized the power of the media and actively sought to cultivate favorable relationships with journalists. He often collaborated with reporters, sharing insights and granting them unprecedented access to his administration. However, this relationship was not without its tensions; Roosevelt was known to publicly criticize the press, particularly investigative journalists, whom he labeled "muckrakers" for their focus on exposing societal issues. His interactions highlighted a duality, as he supported journalistic endeavors that aligned with his progressive agenda while simultaneously battling against narratives he viewed as detrimental to his policies. Roosevelt’s strategic use of the press, including creating the first White House press room and engaging reporters directly, set a precedent for future presidential communication. Ultimately, his era illustrated the evolving dynamics between the media and the presidency, showcasing both collaboration and conflict in the pursuit of public influence.
Theodore Roosevelt and His Relationship with the Press
Journalists and US presidents have often had contentious relationships. Certain administrations, though, seem to battle the media more than others, sometimes interfering with how reporters do their jobs by blocking White House access or attempting to spin, or control, messages.
Theodore Roosevelt, who served as president from 1901-1909, knew how the media worked and what he needed to do to get favorable press. Yet, his interactions with the press were not always positive. In his career as a state assemblyman, police commissioner, governor of New York, army officer, vice president, and the twenty-sixth president of the United States, Roosevelt befriended and collaborated with journalists even as he tried to shape what information appeared in the newspapers. “People think of TR as this caricature, that he is all glasses and big teeth, but what they don’t realize is behind that big grin was a man who was fully aware of how to manipulate the press and others into doing his bidding,” said Susan Sarna, curator of Sagamore Hill National Historic Site, Roosevelt’s former home on Long Island (personal interview, Nov. 7, 2019).
A man known for “titanic energy,” and “a “fiery temperament,” Roosevelt was also considered tender and subtle—someone who loved the “beauties of the natural world.” He had a “wide-ranging, if not contradictory character” (Van Doren, 2015, p. 31). The same mercurial personality dictated his relationship with journalists, and although he actively cultivated them as colleagues, he also argued with them over their published work. For example, he aided investigative journalist Lincoln Steffens during his research on federal corruption, but also complained about the articles when he disagreed with points made in the published syndicated series (Goodwin, 2013).
Roosevelt would lambast the press when frustrated by their coverage. When he attempted to pass railroad regulation in Congress, he became aggravated after a series of articles that, in his view, negatively impacted his proposed policies (Dalton, 2002). He railed against these “muckrakers,”—a term Roosevelt appropriated from John Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress and used to describe some journalists who were so busy looking for problems in the “muck” that they could not see anything positive—thus coining a pejorative term for the investigative journalists of the era (Hillstrom, 2010, p. 79).
When progressive journalist Ray Stannard Baker cautioned him against formally castigating the press, Roosevelt considered his words. As he delivered his “Man with the Muck Rake” talk on April 14, 1906, he balanced his criticism of slipshod reporting with the emphasis that in-depth research on corruption was important. Despite his careful phrasing, the speech was interpreted as an attack on reform journalists who did not distinguish between the “yellow” sensationalist press and the more responsible, socially conscious element (Goodwin, 2013).


Roosevelt and His Relationship with Journalists
Many journalists influenced Roosevelt and impacted his policy decisions during his political career, including some involved with the Progressive movement, a late nineteenth-century political movement with a broad focus on social reform. The work of Jacob Riis, author of How the Other Half Lives, for example, affected his time as New York City police commissioner (Goodwin, 2013). Riis, who photographed the poor living conditions in the city tenements, became an important confidant to Roosevelt, even taking him on a tour of the lodging houses, police beats, and other places he covered, showing Roosevelt firsthand the terrible conditions the poor endured. Riis also introduced Roosevelt to influential politicians and reformers (Dalton, 2002).
In turn, Roosevelt helped Riis’s cause. When Riis took Roosevelt to a police-run hostel, the Church Street Police Lodging House, and spoke to him about the poor conditions and police mistreatment there, Roosevelt closed the police-run lodgings and created municipal lodging houses instead (Dalton, 2002). Roosevelt spoke about the symbiotic nature of their relationship in his autobiography“As President of the Police Board, I was also a member of the Health Board. In both positions I felt that with Jacob Riis’s guidance I would be able to put a goodly number of his principles into actual effect. He and I looked at life and its problems from substantially the same standpoint” (1985, p. 174).
Riis became a de facto advisor to Roosevelt. When Roosevelt was accused of anti-labor union bias, Riis told him to meet with union leaders and speak to them as a person, not an official. Roosevelt did so, and after a three-hour meeting, he had smoothed over their feelings (Goodwin, 2013). Riis and Roosevelt often discussed politics and became friends. When Roosevelt returned to New York after a European tour in 1910, Riis was on hand to greet him along with other close friends and family, and Riis attended Roosevelt’s daughter Ethel’s wedding in 1913 (Dalton, 2002).
Reporters such as Richard Harding Davis helped create Roosevelt’s reputation as a courageous and spirited fighter during the Spanish-American War (1898), in which Roosevelt headed the storied “Rough Riders” cavalry regiment. Roosevelt gave Davis unusual access, allowing him to write from the Rough Riders headquarters (Goodwin, 2013). Davis, at times, even fought beside Roosevelt and wrote many stories about his heroism. In particular, Davis wrote about the skirmish at Las Guásimas on June 24, 1898, as well as the famed Battle of San Juan Hill on July 1, in which Roosevelt exposed himself and his men to gunfire with little protection to take a key position from the Spanish (Dalton, 2002).
Some journalists even gave Roosevelt special access to the information they collected. Ray Stannard Baker, for example, aided Roosevelt as he campaigned for railroad regulations—sharing research and providing him with advance copies of his articles (Goodwin, 2013).
Roosevelt, the Press, and the Presidency
As president, Roosevelt was “hands-on” (Dalton, 2002, p. 210), and it would be him—and not his cabinet—who would tell the press what went on during their meetings. Roosevelt also discouraged leaks from his administration. He knew how to frame stories that appealed to the media and used his colorful personality to fuel coverage. He aided the media’s ability to cover his administration by creating the first press room inside the White House and giving journalists access to phones (Dalton, 2002).
Roosevelt believed that news in the daily paper influenced the public more than editorials, and he sought to capture front-page headlines, believing, according to scholar George Juergens, that a “strong president must not only make news, he must pay close attention to how the news is disseminated as well” (1982, p. 117). Roosevelt, who read several newspapers every day, knew the opportunity that Monday papers providedwith little news on Sundays, editors were always on the lookout for information to fill the next day’s papers, and Roosevelt was happy to provide it. Roosevelt also knew how to blanket the news, promoting his perspectives to drown out those of his rivals (Juergens, 1982).
To create the image he sought, Roosevelt also spoke to his favorite reporters, like Joe Bishop, who regularly worked for the New York Commercial Advertiser, among other papers (Roosevelt, 1985). He was known to speak to the media during his 1 p.m. shaving appointment on weekdays, and “they were so flattered they fell into line,” printing favorable articles (Dalton, 2002, p. 212). He even offered reporters off-the-record information, telling them he would deny anything they credited to him (Dalton, 2002). Reporters who respected Roosevelt’s confidence and wrote about him and his programs positively received remarkable access to the president. “Reporters were amazed, and sometimes a bit concerned, at the things he told them,” wrote Juergens (1982). “He talked freely about the most delicate matters of state, and seemed at times to be almost courting danger by the bluntness with which he discussed personalities in Washington” (p. 114).
Roosevelt treated these journalists as friends, using their first names and inviting them to social occasions (Juergens, 1982). He also gave “leaks” to trustworthy reporters, information they could distribute without revealing the source. He offered backgrounders, speaking with them with the understanding that anything used in the press would not be directly attributed. “Supposedly on a Sunday night he would actually leak to the press . . . about what he was going to do during the week, sometimes about policy and he waited to see the reaction of the people,” said Sarna (personal interview, Nov. 7, 2019). If it was good, Sarna explained, he implemented the proposed policy. If it was not favorable, he denied the leak and said it never happened. “So this is a man who’s very intelligent,” she said. “He knew exactly what he was doing.”
Reporters who crossed him were considered part of what Roosevelt called the Ananias Club, after a liar in the Bible who was killed for speaking untruths. Such individuals were no longer welcome in the White House (Dalton, 2002). “He had a hard time distinguishing between criticism and reporting . . . He didn’t necessarily see the difference,” said Rutgers University professor David Greenberg (2019). “Usually he believed in one right way of framing an issue and that was his way. It was sort of the press’s job to reflect it.”
Roosevelt and the Repercussions of Crossing Him
Roosevelt could be vindictive when he felt betrayed by the press. When a Boston Herald reporter wrote an article in 1904 about Ethel and Quentin, two of the president’s children, following a turkey across the White House lawn and pulling its feathers on Thanksgiving, Roosevelt banned the journalist Jesse Carmichael and his newspaper from the White House (Shafer, 2019). But that did not satisfy his fury, and he even allegedly attempted to get the US Weather Bureau to stop sharing Boston weather information with the paper. Eventually, the Herald apologized and was forgiven (Dalton, 2002).
Another battle Roosevelt had was with the New York World, run by Joseph Pulitzer. The newspaper had run a series of articles in 1908 about the controversial Panama Canal construction project, alleging financial misconduct during the purchase of the land from the French and accusations that Roosevelt had been knowingly untruthful about the deal. Roosevelt said the claims were a “string of infamous libels,” Roosevelt’s Justice Department handed down libel indictments against Pulitzer, his editor, and his newspaper. The charges were ultimately dismissed but typified Roosevelt’s combative nature (Abrams, 2013, p. 187).
When Roosevelt first arrived at the White House as president, he immediately met with various members of the press, including the managers of the Associated Press, the Scripps-McRae Press Association, and the New York Sun, and pledged that he would offer access if they agreed not to violate confidences and not publish certain information (Goodwin, 2013). “The president saw news as an instrument of power,” wrote Juergens (1982). “It followed that he wanted to waste no time getting his publicity operation in order” (p. 113).
Conclusion
Roosevelt was a master at influencing the media. He courted journalists, using friendliness and favors to sway them into covering his administration more positively. He assessed public opinion through leaks and floating policy ideas in the media. He used his hunting trips to garner publicity and engaged in stunts like riding a submarine in the Long Island Sound to gather support for new vessels. He understood the importance of creating an accessible press room and having press conferences. He employed the first government press officer, allowing his personal secretary, William Loeb, Jr., to speak with journalists for him.
In part, Roosevelt helped shape his legacy by convincing the press to tell stories that cast him as a brash innovator through his creative use of publicity stunts. He enthusiastically opened the White House to the media and offered great access to the presidency, which created close relationships with reporters. Roosevelt exploited this intimacy by gaining early access to their research and information, which helped him make policy decisions. Although he could not always control the press, Roosevelt set a precedent for future administrations, in which publicity and influencing public opinion through crafting media messages became an important part of a strong presidential strategy.
About the Author
Sandra Mardenfeld is a freelance writer, editor, social media manager, marketing consultant, and educator based in Long Island, New York. She has worked as the managing editor for several national magazines, as the Broadway editor of Playbill and as an editor and writer on many websites. She currently teaches in Hofstra University’s Continuing Education program and in the Department of Journalism, Media Studies, and Public Relations, as well as at Five Towns College. She has also worked as an assistant professor for LIU Post, St. Thomas Aquinas College, and Mercy College.
Works Cited
Abrams, F. (2013). Theodore Roosevelt and the press. Friend of the Court: On the front lines with the First Amendment (pp. 183–190). Yale University Press.
Goodwin, D. K. (2013). The bully pulpit: Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and the golden age of journalism. Simon & Schuster.
Greenberg, D. (2019, October 24). TR and the media. Theodore Roosevelt Legacy Conference, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York.
Juergens, G. (1982). “Theodore Roosevelt and the Press.” Daedalus, 111(4), 113–133. www.jstor.org/stable/20024820
Knopp, E. E. (2024). Myths and facts about Theodore Roosevelt. PowerKids Press.
Morris, E. (2010). Colonel Roosevelt. Random House.
Roosevelt, T. (1985). Theodore Roosevelt: An autobiography. 1913. New York: Da Capo Press.
Shafer, R. (2019, November 26). A Thanksgiving turkey terrorized by the president’s kids? Teddy Roosevelt was furious about that story. The Washington Post. www.washingtonpost.com/history/2019/11/26/thanksgiving-turkey-terrorized-by-presidents-kids-teddy-roosevelt-was-furious-about-that-story
Swanson, R. A. (2019). The strenuous life: Theodore Roosevelt and the making of the American athlete (1st diversion ed.). Diversion Books.
Thompson, J. M. (2019). Great power rising: Theodore Roosevelt and the politics of U.S. foreign policy. Oxford University Press.
Van Doren, A. (2015). The house tells the story: Homes of the American presidents. Godine.
Wetzel, B. J. (2021). Theodore Roosevelt: preaching from the bully pulpit. Oxford University Press.