Hokan Language Family

  • CULTURE AREA: California, Southwest
  • TRIBES AFFECTED: Achumawi (Pit River), Atsugewi, Chimariko, Chumash, Esselen, Karuk, Pomo, Salinan, Seri, Shasta, Tequistlatec, Washoe, Yana, Yuman

There is an extraordinary amount of controversy regarding the Hokan language classification, including whether it should even exist. Unlike closely related families such as the Algonquian language family or the Iroquoian language family, Hokan comprises several subfamilies whose relationships are not recognized by all linguists.

99109694-94535.jpg

The Hokan classification was first proposed in New Linguistic Families in California (1913) by Alfred Kroeber and R. B. Dixon, who saw a relationship among Karuk, Chimariko, Shastan, Yuman, Esselen, Pomo, and Yan'an; they named this new family Hokan. Kroeber and Dixon also linked Salinan and Chumash as a new family called Iskoman. J. P. Harrington (in American Anthropologist, vol. 15, 1913) suggested a link between Chumash and Yuman, effectively joining the Hokan and Iskoman families. In 1917, Edward Sapir, in The Position of Yana in the Hokan Stock, confirmed Hokan’s relationships and added Seri and Chontal to the grouping. In Linguistic Families of California (1919), Kroeber and Dixon added Washoe to the list.

A more recent grouping of Hokan divides the family into eight groups: Northern (which includes Karuk, Shasta, Chimariko, Palahnihan, Yan'an, and Pomo), Washoe, Salinan-Chumash, Seri-Yuman (which includes Seri, Hualapai, Havasupai, Yavapai, Paipai, Mojave, Maricopa, Quechan, Diegueño, Cocopah, and Kiliwa), Waicuri-Quiniqua, Coahuiltecan, Tequistlatecan, and Southern (which includes Tlapanec, Jicaque, and Jurimaugui). This is the grouping favored by Joseph H. Greenberg in Language in the Americas (1987).

A more conservative approach is advised in The Languages of North America by Lyle Campbell and Marianne Mithun (1979). These groupings are Northern (as described above), Esselen-Yuman, Salinan-Seri (including Chumash, Salinan, and Seri), Washoe, and Tequistlatec. Following the more conservative grouping, there were approximately fifteen thousand speakers of Hokan languages in the 1970s. The largest number of these speakers (approximately ten thousand) were speakers of Tequistlatec in Mexico, and the majority of them were bilingual in Spanish. In the twenty-first century, the number of speakers of the Hokan languages decreased as more Hokan languages faced extinction even with language revitalization programs.

Bibliography

“California Indian Languages: Hokan Tribes.” California State Parks, www.parks.ca.gov/?page‗id=23732. Accessed 28 Dec. 2024.

Jany, Carmen. "Hokan Languages." Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Oxford University Press, 5 Aug. 2016, oxfordre.com/linguistics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-19. Accessed 28 Dec. 2024.

Poser, William J. “Binary Comparison and the History of Hokan Comparative Studies.” International Journal of American Linguistics, vol. 61, no. 1, 1995, pp. 135–44. The University of Chicago Press Journals, doi.org/10.1086/466247. Accessed 28 Dec. 2024.