Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act

The Law: Federal law expanding federal law-enforcement powers to counter terrorism and restrict appeals for those convicted of capital crimes

Date: Signed into law on April 24, 1996

Significance: The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act granted the federal government new powers in fighting terrorism and significantly restricted post-conviction appeals brought by death-row inmates in federal court.

Following the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, the federal government was under increasing pressure to respond to terrorism taking place on American soil. At the same time, condemned inmates who filed habeas corpus petitions to have their convictions reviewed were extending their time on death row by years, at cost to taxpayers. The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) was a response to these two situations.

95342706-19974.jpg95342706-19975.jpg

The new law empowered the federal government to deny visas to people identified as belonging to terrorist groups and to deport legal resident aliens by expanding the definition of crimes that result in deportation and by eliminating judicial review of deportation orders. An important provision of the law is the authority of the federal government to designate a group as a foreign terrorist organization (FTO), allowing the group’s assets to be seized and limiting their fund-raising ability in the United States. Also, the law banned the provision of support to countries that aid terrorist groups, granted Americans the ability to sue foreign countries in federal court for terrorism aimed at Americans abroad, and declared acts of participation in terrorism in the United States to be federal crimes.

The AEDPA was also designed to limit federal habeas corpus petitions filed by state inmates convicted of capital crimes, in an effort to prevent frivolous lawsuits. It accomplished this by requiring all inmates to exhaust their state-level appeals before filing a petition in federal court and limited the time inmates had to file a federal petition to one year after exhausting their state appeals. Also, federal petitions were effectively limited to one by requiring any successive petitions be reviewed for merit by a panel of three federal judges before being considered.

Bibliography

Chang, Nancy. Silencing Political Dissent. New York: Seven Stories, 2002. Print.

Dempsey, James X., and David Cole. Terrorism and the Constitution: Sacrificing Civil Liberties in the Name of National Security. 3rd ed. New York: New Press, 2006. Print.

Gerken, Christina. Model Immigrants and Undesirable Aliens: The Cost of Immigration Reform in the 1990s. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2013. Print.

Latzer, Barry. Death Penalty Cases. 3rd ed. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2012. Print.