Auburn system

IDENTIFICATION: Prison-design plan developed and implemented during the penitentiary movement of the early nineteenth century

PLACE: Auburn, New York

SIGNIFICANCE: The Auburn system of prison design was the architectural plan for the first large-scale prison built to maximize the rehabilitation and the labor potential of incarcerated offenders, while reducing construction and operating costs. Even though this model of incarceration was the key mechanism implemented to reform offenders during the penitentiary movement, it has been noted, even since its inception, for pervasive offender abuse and prison overcrowding.

At the turn of the nineteenth century, Americans pushing for prison reform embraced the ideals and promises of the penitentiary. In essence, the penitentiary’s purpose was to rehabilitate the offender through silent reflection and penance. Initially, penitentiary design followed the model of the Pennsylvania system plan, wherein individual offenders were housed in solitary cells at all times. However, that prison and jail system was too expensive to build and manage, as considerable land was needed to erect the large structures, and exceptional numbers of qualified staff were required for inmate surveillance and control. The Auburn system was thus developed and implemented to counter the negative reality of the Pennsylvania system design.

95342717-19992.jpg95342717-19993.jpg

The Auburn system penitentiary called for offenders to sleep in small, individual cells, yet dine and work silently in common areas. Hence, this design and its inherent regimes were often referred to as the congregate system. The first two penitentiaries built according to this plan were New York’s Auburn and Sing Sing prisons, both which opened during the 1820s.

Cells in Auburn-style facilities were positioned back-to-back and stacked in tiers within hollow buildings. The ideal of the Auburn-style prison was maximization of the rehabilitation and labor potential of offenders. This ideal of the Auburn design was so widely embraced, it influenced prison construction throughout the United States during the remainder of the nineteenth and the early twentieth centuries. In fact, Sing Sing prison remains in use today.

Auburn-style facilities were often built to be large, foreboding structures, in the hope that the very essence of the prisons would serve as a deterrent to potential offenders. Nevertheless, penologists have questioned the rehabilitative and deterrent value of the Auburn system design, as offender recidivism, unsanitary conditions, and corporal punishment have been the reality in many facilities built according to the design plan of the Auburn system.

Bibliography

Blomberg, Thomas G., and Karol Lucken. American Penology. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 2000. Print.

Johnston, Norman. The Human Cage: A Brief History of Prison Architecture. New York: Walker, 1973. Print.

Kammen, Carol. "Silence and Solitude in Auburn Prison's Early Years." Ithaca Journal, 1 June 2017, www.ithacajournal.com/story/news/local/2017/06/01/silence-and-solitude-auburn-prisons-early-years/362603001/. Accessed 20 june 2024.

Neal, Charles. "Were Early American Prisons Similar to Today's?" JSTOR, 19 Jan. 2022, daily.jstor.org/were-early-american-prisons-similar-to-todays/. Accessed 20 June 2024.

Pollock, Joycelyn M. Prisons and Prison Life: Costs and Consequences. New York: Oxford UP, 2013. Print.

Waid, Courtney A., and Carl B. Clements. “Correctional Facility Design: Past, Present and Future.” Corrections Compendium 26.11 (2001). Print.