Contempt of court
Contempt of court refers to the legal mechanism that allows judges to maintain order and decorum within court proceedings. This can involve citing individuals who disrupt court activities or fail to comply with court orders. Judges exercise discretion in determining when to hold someone in contempt, often reserving this action for serious disruptions or to set an example for others present. The implications of being found in contempt can be significant, as individuals may face fines, jail time, or both, and they can be detained without trial until they comply with the court's directives.
This legal tool also serves a broader purpose, as it is used to deter disruptive behavior in courtrooms and ensure adherence to legal processes. For instance, individuals who do not comply with subpoenas or violate gag orders may be held in contempt. This mechanism underscores the judicial system's authority and ability to enforce compliance, reflecting a balance between maintaining order and protecting the rights of individuals within the legal framework.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Contempt of court
SIGNIFICANCE: Citing persons who disrupt court procedures or disobey court orders with contempt of court can be a powerful tool for maintaining order and decorum within courtrooms, and judges can use contempt of court to send offenders to jail without the help of police or trials.
Just as law-enforcement officers use discretion in deciding whom to arrest, judges use discretion when deciding to hold persons in contempt of court. However, just as police officers do not issue tickets to all motorists who exceed posted speed limits, judges do not cite all those who disrupt court proceedings with contempt. Judges typically reserve contempt citations for those who they believe are creating the most serious disorders and for situations in which they wish to set examples for other persons present in their courtrooms.
![Nine of the Hollywood 10 charged with contempt of Congress 1947. Charged with contempt of Congress, nine Hollywood men give themselves up to U.S. Marshal in December 10, 1947. By Los Angeles Times photographic archive - Digital collections — UCLA Library [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons 95342787-20113.jpg](https://imageserver.ebscohost.com/img/embimages/ers/sp/embedded/95342787-20113.jpg?ephost1=dGJyMNHX8kSepq84xNvgOLCmsE2epq5Srqa4SK6WxWXS)
Contempt of court can also be used as a prosecutorial tool for imprisoning wrongdoers without trials. For example, prosecutors might call certain witnesses to testify, knowing that they are likely not to cooperate and then be jailed for contempt of court. In fact, everyone who fails to comply with subpoenas or other court orders can be punished with contempt. In addition, those who disobey gag orders can also be held in contempt of court. Those who are found in contempt of court can be subjected to fines, jail time, or both, depending on the decisions of the judges holding the offenders in contempt. Those held in jail can be kept there without trial until they comply with the original court orders.
A justification for the courts’ power to punish those guilty of contempt of court is deterrence. The sanctioning of individuals with contempt of court may deter others from being disruptive in court or from disobeying court orders. It can be especially useful in persuading news reporters to obey gag orders.
Bibliography
Hilotin-Lee, Lyle Therese A. "Civil Contempt of Court." FindLaw, 4 Mar. 2024, www.findlaw.com/litigation/going-to-court/civil-contempt-of-court.html. Accessed 25 June 2024.
Merryman, Ashley. "What Is Contempt of Court?" US News, 25 June 2024, law.usnews.com/law-firms/advice/articles/what-is-contempt-of-court. Accessed 25 June 2024.
Neubauer, D. W. America’s Courts and the Criminal Justice System. 7th ed. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 2002.
Rabe, Gary A., and Dean John Champion. Criminal Courts: Structure, Process and Issues. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 2002.