Contributing to delinquency of minors
Contributing to the delinquency of minors refers to the actions of adults that may lead to or encourage unlawful or inappropriate behavior in children and adolescents. This concept has evolved significantly over time, particularly following the societal changes brought by the Industrial Revolution, which transformed the perception of childhood from a phase of labor to a time for education and moral development. As urbanization increased, education became a priority, and there was a growing understanding of the need to protect young individuals from engaging in harmful behaviors that were previously accepted in adult society, such as smoking or drinking.
Modern laws reflect a commitment to safeguarding minors, imposing penalties on adults who fail to prevent their children from engaging in activities deemed inappropriate or illegal. For instance, an adult who observes a minor smoking without intervening could face legal repercussions. Similarly, if a parent partakes in illegal activities, they might also be held accountable if their behavior sets a poor example for their children. Overall, this area of law emphasizes the responsibility of adults to guide minors away from delinquent paths, highlighting the broader societal recognition of childhood as a unique and critical stage of development that warrants protection and guidance.
On this Page
Contributing to delinquency of minors
SIGNIFICANCE: American laws are designed to protect naïve juveniles from the depredations of adults.
Contributing to the delinquency of a minor is, like the term “juvenile delinquency,” relatively recent in origin. For centuries, childhood was the most precarious period in an individual’s life. Scant knowledge existed concerning illnesses and bacteria, and, as a result, it was common for people to die in infancy or childhood—the central reason that married couples had big families. If children were strong enough to survive, around age seven they entered the workforce alongside their parents and older siblings, becoming “little adults.”
Views regarding childhood began changing in the nineteenth century because of the paradigm shift caused by the Industrial Revolution. Instead of families working together at the farm, people began migrating into the cities. Children competed with their elders for the new jobs created by the industrial boom. Up to this point, most children could not read or write, because education was not a particularly important issue for individuals tilling the soil.
With the growth of urban populations, education became increasingly important. Most parents were happy for their children to gain educations because it meant they might not have to work twelve to fifteen hours a day in factories. In addition to providing an academic education, many reformers attempted to teach the children that certain activities or vices were unhealthy and that it would be advantageous to leave certain things alone. For example, many children enjoyed the same unhealthy habits as their parents, such as smoking, using snuff or chewing tobacco, and drinking alcohol. Once society started seeing childhood as separate from adulthood, the social and moral mores changed, and what had once been done in the open (such as smoking cigarettes) now became surreptitious. Likewise, behaviors considered normal for adults began to be seen as taboo for juveniles.
Over time, statutes and law codes were written describing the punishments, usually mild, that adults would receive if they engaged in any activities that might lead juveniles toward delinquency. Furthermore, if adults allowed juveniles to engage in behavior considered “out-of-bounds,” they could face charges based on not restricting the child. For example, adults who catch children smoking cigarettes but do nothing could conceivably be brought before a judge, as tobacco use is a proscribed activity for individuals who have not reached the age of majority. Furthermore, if a parent indulges in an illegal activity, such as smoking marijuana, the state has the right to arrest the parent for setting an example that could conceivably cause the juvenile to seek out opportunities for further drug exploration.
Bibliography
Champion, Dean John. The Juvenile Justice System: Delinquency, Processing, and the Law. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 2003.
"Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor." FindLaw, 30 Aug. 2023, www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-charges/contributing-to-the-delinquency-of-a-minor.html. Accessed 25 June 2024.
Cox, Steven M., John J. Conrad, and Jennifer M. Allen. Juvenile Justice: A Guide to Theory and Practice. 5th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2003.
Malmgren, K. W., and S. M. Meisel. “Examining the Link Between Child Maltreatment and Delinquency for Youth with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders.” Child Welfare 83, no. 2 (2004): 175-189.
Paternoster, R., S. Bushway, R. Brame, and R. Apel. “The Effects of Teenage Employment on Delinquency and Problem Behaviors.” Social Force 82, no. 1 (2003): 297-336.
Riznyk, Ilona. "Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor." Lawrina Match, 26 Jan. 2024, lawrina.org/match/juvenile-law/contributing-to-the-delinquency-of-a-minor/. Accessed 25 June 2024.
Shoemaker, D. J. Theories of Delinquency: An Examination of Explanations of Delinquent Behavior. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Siegel, Larry J., Brandon C. Welsh, and Joseph J. Senna. Juvenile Delinquency: Theory, Practice, and Law. 8th ed. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, 2002.
Vander Ven, Thomas. Working Mothers and Juvenile Delinquency. New York: LFB Scholarly, 2003.