Cross-contamination of evidence
Cross-contamination of evidence refers to the unintended introduction of extraneous materials to physical evidence from a crime scene, which can compromise its integrity. This phenomenon can occur at various stages, including during the initial collection, transportation, storage, or analysis of evidence. The preservation of evidence purity is crucial, as contaminated samples may lead to incorrect conclusions, potentially impacting legal outcomes. The principle known as Locard's exchange principle underlines the importance of trace evidence, suggesting that contact between objects will result in the transfer of material, thereby creating potential links between suspects and crime scenes.
Effective collection methods are essential to ensure that evidence reflects the original state of the crime scene. Cross-contamination can arise from the actions of first responders who may inadvertently disturb evidence, improper use of protective gear, or even transferring evidence between related locations. Advances in technology have introduced more robust systems for maintaining a chain of custody, such as electronic documentation and environmental monitoring tools, to mitigate these risks. Understanding and preventing cross-contamination is vital for forensic investigations, as it not only supports the identification of suspects but also serves to exonerate the innocent when applicable.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Cross-contamination of evidence
DEFINITION: Failure to preserve the purity or exclusivity of physical evidence related to a crime scene through the introduction of transferred materials from other sections of the crime scene, various related crime scenes, or other sources.
SIGNIFICANCE: Crime scenes yield evidence that can link suspects, victims, and the actions of persons present when the crimes occurred. The collection and preservation of evidential materials without cross-contamination is thus crucial, as incorrect conclusions may be drawn from contaminated evidence.
Forensic investigation of a crime scene relies on Locard’s exchange principle, which states that when two objects come in contact, they exchange trace evidence. A crime scene thus contains that may place a at the scene, and analysis of that evidence may reveal the associations between perpetrator and crime that are necessary for a to obtain a in a court of law. Evidence may also refute theories that link a suspect to a crime and thus may exonerate the innocent.
The methods used in the collection and preservation of evidence are intended to ensure that the preserved materials did originate from the crime scene, that the materials are pertinent to the crime, and that the materials can be analyzed in a comparable state to the way they were found at the scene. Cross-contamination of evidence results from the failure to protect an evidence sample from the transfer of other material onto or into it. Evidence may become cross-contaminated at the crime scene during collection and packaging of evidential materials, during transportation to laboratories or other facilities, during storage, or while it is undergoing analysis.
At the crime scene, cross-contamination of evidence is most likely to occur when the actions of first responders and others move materials such as hairs, fibers, and fluids around the scene. Evidence may also be compromised by cross-contamination when investigators do not use crime scene protective gear or use such gear improperly, resulting in their leaving their own fingerprints, hair, and fluids at the scene. Also, when investigators leave the crime scene to search related areas (such as a suspect’s car), evidence may be transferred from one scene to the other, resulting in cross-contamination.
Materials other than the evidential materials gathered at the crime scene may cause cross-contamination if the evidence samples are not properly packaged and safeguarded during transportation to labs or other locations. In addition, evidence must be stored properly and protected while it is being analyzed or tested to prevent cross-contamination.
Technology offers improved chain of custody documentation and preservation of evidence. Examples include electronic chain of custody (eCOC) and environmental monitoring systems.
Bibliography
Alketbi, Salem Khalifa. "Maintaining the Chain of Custody: Anti-Contamination Measures for Trace DNA Evidence." International Journal of Science and Research Archive, vol. 8, no. 2, 2023, pp. 457-461, doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2023.8.2.0257. Accessed 15 Aug. 2024.
Fenoff, Roy, et al. Crime Scene Investigation, 4th ed, Routledge, 2022.
Fisher, Barry A. J., and David R. Fisher. Techniques of Crime Scene Investigation. 9th ed. CRC Press, 2022.
Genge, N. E. The Forensic Casebook: The Science of Crime Scene Investigation. New York: Ballantine, 2002.
Pentland, Peter, and Pennie Stoyles. Forensic Science. Philadelphia: Chelsea House, 2003.
Platt, Richard. Crime Scene: The Ultimate Guide to Forensic Science. New York: Dorling Kindersley, 2003.