Dark figure of crime
The "dark figure of crime" refers to the significant gap between the number of crimes that actually occur and those that are recorded in official statistics. Various factors contribute to this phenomenon, including unawareness of criminal activity by the perpetrator, lack of witnesses, or unwillingness to report crimes due to distrust in law enforcement. In some situations, even when crimes are reported, they may not be documented due to police oversight, workload, corruption, or legislative hurdles.
The dark figure of crime poses challenges for criminologists, as studies rely heavily on reported data, which may not reflect true crime rates. To address this issue, researchers often employ mathematical formulas that combine official reports with estimates and unofficial evidence, aiming to provide a more accurate understanding of crime prevalence. Efforts to reduce the dark figure of crime include enhancing community awareness, fostering trust in police through procedural justice, and improving record-keeping practices. Despite these initiatives, some crimes, particularly those involving personal relationships or sensitive issues, remain underreported. Understanding the dark figure of crime is crucial for accurate crime analysis and effective law enforcement strategies.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Dark figure of crime
The dark figure of crime refers to all crimes that are not recorded in official statistics. This happens for various reasons. Sometimes, the criminals do not realize that they are committing a crime, and there is not a witness to the crime, so no one reports it. Other times, the only witness is a criminal who will not report the crime. Some crimes have multiple witnesses who all refuse to report the crime to police. They may distrust the authorities or may not want to get a friend or family member into trouble.
Even if a crime is reported to the police, it may not be recorded. Police are often overworked and may neglect to file a report for an incident. A case might not meet certain specific criteria for recording. Additionally, police corruption may stop officers from recording some crimes.
Researchers sometimes use mathematical formulas to try to compensate for the dark figure of crime in criminology. These formulas utilize official reports in addition to estimates and unofficial evidence. Though not perfect, they allow criminologists and law enforcement to work with datasets that may be more correct than official statistics.
Background
All studies of criminology, including studies of crime rates, crime reporting, and the dark figure of crime, include the study of crime itself. Crimes are acts that break local, state, or federal laws. Numerous theorists have studied crime and have published many theories of the causes of high crime rates. Some criminologists believe that high crime rates are the result of a lack of equality. Some believe that urban environments cause higher crime rates. Others contend that the specific neighborhood in which a child is raised has a significant impact on the chances of them committing crimes in the future.
Police incident recording and crime reporting have increased throughout history. As these factors increase, the dark figure of crime decreases. As the dark figure of crime decreases, both police and criminologists have more accurate information to use to reduce the number of crimes.
Overview
The dark figure of crime is the difference between the number of crimes reported and the number of crimes that actually occur. Criminal researchers can only study the crimes that are reported because these are the only crimes of which they are aware. If crime statistics are less accurate, then any crime studies based on those statistics are less accurate.
The modern process of reporting crimes includes several limitations. First, someone has to know that a crime was committed. For this to occur, the individual committing the crime must have been aware that they committed the crime. Alternatively, someone has to observe someone else unwittingly committing a crime. For example, if an individual did not realize that crossing a street outside of a crosswalk was illegal and no one witnessed the crime, there is no way that the crime could be reported.
Assuming someone witnessed the crime, the crime must then be reported to the relevant authorities. If the only person to witness the crime was the individual who committed it, then it is extremely unlikely that the crime will be reported to the authorities. Most criminals attempt to avoid implicating themselves to avoid the legal consequences of their crime. For this reason, most crimes in which the criminal is the only knowing witness go unreported. If there are other witnesses, they must feel comfortable enough with the authorities to report the crime themselves. If they fail to trust the authorities, have no means to report the crime to the authorities, or are intimidated by the criminal, the crime may go unreported.
Other witnessed crimes might not be reported to the police for personal reasons. For example, many women fail to report sexual assaults because of the difficulties associated with the reporting process. They may also avoid reporting the crime because of the stigma of being labeled a sexual assault victim. In other cases, individuals may fail to report crimes because the criminal is a friend or family member. For example, if someone knows a friend or family member has driven a vehicle while intoxicated, they are less likely to report that crime to the police.
Lastly, once a crime is reported to the police, it must actually be recorded by the police. A crime reported to the police might not be recorded for numerous reasons. Legislative difficulties, technological difficulties, and police error can cause a crime not to be recorded. Sometimes, overworked police officers neglect to follow up on smaller cases. Other times, corruption can cause a case to be dropped.
Authorities across the developed world have taken steps to reduce the number of dark crimes that happen on a regular basis. They worked to raise awareness in crime-prone areas, increasing the number of potential witnesses to each crime. Additionally, many police forces have adopted procedural justice to increase the sense of police legitimacy in their area. Strong feelings of police legitimacy make it more likely that citizens will come to the police with crimes and grievances. Many police forces are also taking initiatives to maintain stronger records, allowing such records to be accessed by research agencies and reducing the number of dark crimes.
Some experts use probability formulas to predict the occurrences of certain types of crime. These crimes, though serious, are less likely to be reported to police. These formulas combine prior assumptions about a crime’s prevalence in an area with evidence of a crime’s prevalence in an area to remove the dark figure of crime. Though imperfect, these tools help law enforcement officials estimate the true rates for certain crimes.
Bibliography
Berlinski, Claire. “The Dark Figure of British Crime.” City Journal, spring 2009, www.city-journal.org/html/dark-figure-british-crime-13162.html. Accessed 24 Dec. 2024.
Biderman, Albert D. "On Exploring the 'Dark Figure' of Crime." The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1967, doi.org/10.1177/000271626737400102. Accessed 24 Dec. 2024.
“Dark Figure of Crime.” Tutor2u, www.tutor2u.net/sociology/topics/dark-figure-of-crime. Accessed 24 Dec. 2024.
“The Dark Figure of Crime.” LawTeacher, 26 Aug. 2021, www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/criminology/the-dark-figure-of-crime.php. Accessed 24 Dec. 2024.
Sanchez, Shanell. “2.1. Dark or Hidden Figure of Crime.” Open Oregon Education Resources, 2019, openoregon.pressbooks.pub/ccj230/chapter/2-1-dark-figure-of-crime-or-unreported-crime/. Accessed 24 Dec. 2024.