Economic sanctions
Economic sanctions are a strategic tool employed by governments to influence the behavior of other nations without resorting to military force. By restricting trade in essential resources—such as oil, food, and construction materials—sanctions aim to inflict economic hardship, ultimately compelling the targeted country to comply with external demands. These sanctions can affect entire populations, often leading to significant economic downturns and shortages of goods, disproportionately impacting the poorest citizens. While this method of negotiation is viewed as less violent than warfare, its effectiveness is debated; critics argue that it can sometimes strengthen the resolve of targeted leaders, who might rally national support against perceived external aggressors.
Historically, sanctions have been used in various contexts, from ancient Athens to modern political conflicts. They have played a notable role in significant events, such as the dismantling of apartheid in South Africa and the pressures faced by Iraq following its invasion of Kuwait. The moral implications of sanctions are also a point of contention, as they often exacerbate the struggles of the vulnerable while leaving wealthier citizens relatively unharmed. Thus, while economic sanctions are a popular alternative to military intervention, their impacts and effectiveness continue to be closely scrutinized by humanitarian experts and political analysts alike.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Economic sanctions
Economic sanctions are a nonviolent form of forceful negotiation employed by governments. Rather than attacking with military force, nations utilizing economic sanctions attack by damaging another nation's economy. This is achieved by restricting the trade of critical resources with that nation. Sanctions commonly restrict natural resources, such as oil and construction materials, but may also restrict access to luxury goods, textiles, and food. Some sanctions specifically attack the industries and personal wealth of national leaders, encouraging them to act in their own best interest by bending to the will of other nations.
Some humanitarian experts criticize the use of economic sanctions. They argue that while sanctions are less deadly than open warfare, a forced economic downturn primarily affects the nation's poor. The poor are also the least likely to be able to successfully weather the resource shortages created by some sanctions.
Background
Some of the earliest instances of sanctions can be traced back to the ancient world. Records state that the Ancient Athenians imposed sanctions on the city Megara in 432 BCE. Trade embargos, economic sanctions, and military blockades continued to be utilized throughout the ages.
In 1919, American President Woodrow Wilson wanted the fledgling League of Nations to heavily utilize economic sanctions to bring other nations into compliance with its demands. The sanctions Wilson wanted to use were much more severe than many employed today and included banning citizens of an offending country from communicating with citizens of any nations belonging to the league. When this system was tested against Benito Mussolini's administration, it failed to enforce any policy change. Mussolini simply traded with France and Britain, who refused to enforce the sanctions, instead of altering any policies.
Before entering World War II, the United States established economic sanctions against Japan to condemn its participation in the war. After the war ended, the United Nations granted the power to establish and maintain economic sanctions to its security council, which used its power against Rhodesia and South Africa as a means of condemning the actions of those governments.
In 1986, the United States, the European Commission, and Japan imposed economic sanctions against South Africa. These sanctions were designed to force the government to dismantle Apartheid. Because the United States, Europe, and Japan were some of South Africa's most important trading partners, the sanctions were particularly serious. They included various steel and iron products, uranium, coal, textiles, agricultural products, food, and numerous petroleum products. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) also issued export embargoes and sanctions against South Africa.
In 1990, the United Nations Security Council established extremely thorough sanctions against Iraq. The United Nations disapproved of Iraq's invasion of its neighbor Kuwait. It hoped the sanctions would hurt Iraq's weapon development programs and encourage Saddam Hussein to stop fighting with Kuwait.
After the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine several countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union, imposed economic sanctions on Russia. The United States targeted Russia's financial sector, freezing $5 billion of the Russian Central Bank's US assets. The US and its G7 allies also imposed sanctions on diamonds and crude oil.
Overview
Economic sanctions are a nonviolent means of forcing one country to comply with another's demands. They involve restricting trade with another nation, harming the nation's economy until it bends to the demands or the sanctions are lifted. Sanctions are an alternative to military engagement, which is expensive, damaging to property, and deadly to the citizens of both nations.
Economic sanctions come in a variety of forms. In most cases, sanctions are designed to harm everyone in a nation by causing a loss of jobs and a general economic downturn. Many sanctions also cause shortages of essential and luxury goods throughout the nation, including raw materials for construction, oil, food, and textile goods. When this type of sanction is functioning properly, leaders will eventually bend to the demands of the other nation for the good of their people. If they fail to do so, unhappy citizens throughout the suffering nation will force the change to alleviate economic pressure.
In other cases, sanctions can be targeted toward specific individuals, usually government officials. They may freeze the assets of those individuals or intentionally harm industries essential to their livelihoods. If this type of sanction is functioning properly, the nation's leaders will enact the demanded policy change out of their own personal interests.
Many experts question the effectiveness of sanctions. In some cases, sanctions have the opposite of their intended effect. For example, when the United States initiated sanctions against Japan in World War II, it contributed to Japan's decision to attack the United States. Other theorists argue that economic hardship intentionally caused by other nations may cause the citizens of a country to rally around their leaders, making policy change even more difficult.
However, in many instances, economic sanctions have been successful. They directly contributed to the fall of Apartheid in South Africa and helped curb Libya's support of organizations that support international terrorism. Additionally, many financial experts believe that properly conducted sanctions cause a nation's gross domestic product (GDP) to fall at a rate concurrent with those of an economic depression, providing significant pressure for a nation to change its policies.
Many humanitarians question the morality of sanctions. While they are less dangerous and deadly than military action, traditional sanctions are unlikely to have a significant impact on a country's wealthy citizens. Instead, the hardship caused by thoroughly conducted economic sanctions severely harms the poor and middle class of the target nation, pushing some citizens into poverty or starvation. Targeted sanctions, which are tailored to primarily affect the industries and economic well-being of national leaders, are sometimes presented as a humanitarian alternative to sanctions that target an entire nation.
Bibliography
Berman, Noah. “Two Years of War in Ukraine: Are Sanctions Against Russia Making a Difference?” Council on Foreign Relations, 23 Feb. 2024, www.cfr.org/in-brief/two-years-war-ukraine-are-sanctions-against-russia-making-difference?gad‗source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA9667BhDoARIsANnamQZJdBf8Y72cVUeb6M0Exzq-FCh6uI‗SqROo6eSYA5MdXENe9Zs21uEaAq3KEALw‗wcB. Accessed 25 Dec. 2024.
Friedman, Uri. "Smart Sanctions: A Short History." Foreign Policy, 23 Apr. 2012, foreignpolicy.com/2012/04/23/smart-sanctions-a-short-history. Accessed 25 Dec. 2024.
Foer, Franklin. "Economic Sanctions." Slate, 14 Sept. 1996, www.slate.com/articles/news‗and‗politics/the‗gist/1996/09/economic‗sanctions.html. Accessed 25 Dec. 2024.
Haas, Richard N. "Economic Sanctions: Too Much of a Bad Thing." Brookings, 1 June 1998, www.brookings.edu/research/economic-sanctions-too-much-of-a-bad-thing. Accessed 25 Dec. 2024.
Kolodkin, Barry. "What Are Sanctions?" ThoughtCo., 15 May 2017, www.thoughtco.com/what-are-sanctions-3310373. Accessed 25 Dec. 2024.
Marcus, Jonathan. "Analysis: Do Economic Sanctions Work?" BBC News, 26 July 2010, www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-10742109. Accessed 25 Dec. 2024.
McMahon, Robert. "UN Sanctions: A Mixed Record." Council on Foreign Relations, 17 Nov. 2006, www.cfr.org/backgrounder/un-sanctions-mixed-record. Accessed 25 Dec. 2024.
Radcliffe, Brent. "How Economic Sanctions Work." Investopedia, 18 Aug. 2016, www.investopedia.com/articles/economics/10/economic-sanctions.asp. Accessed 25 Dec. 2024.
"The Impact of Economic Sanctions." World Finance, www.worldfinance.com/special-reports/the-impact-of-economic-sanctions. Accessed 25 Dec 2024.