"Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar" is a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed the legality of minimum fee schedules enforced by bar associations in Virginia. The case arose when the Goldfarbs were unable to find a lawyer willing to perform a real estate title examination for less than the minimum fee set by the county bar association, leading them to challenge the state bar association for price fixing. The Supreme Court, in an 8-0 decision led by Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, ruled in favor of the Goldfarbs, establishing that the Sherman Antitrust Act applies to professional services, including legal services. This ruling emphasized the importance of competition in the legal field and invalidated the notion that antitrust laws did not extend to "learned professions." The Court highlighted the broader economic implications, noting that transactions involving real estate often cross state lines, thus falling under the commerce clause. The outcome of this case set a precedent that reinforced consumer rights and challenged the regulation of legal fees by professional associations. Overall, "Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar" underscored the intersection of law, economics, and professional conduct in a way that resonates with ongoing discussions about competition and regulation in various fields.