Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan
"Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan" is a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1982, which addressed issues of gender discrimination in educational institutions. The case emerged when a young man, Hogan, challenged the admission policy of the Mississippi University for Women, which restricted enrollment to female students in its nursing program. Hogan argued that this policy violated his right to equal protection under the law, as it discriminated against him solely based on his gender. The Supreme Court, led by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, ruled in his favor, asserting that the state's rationale for the women-only policy did not sufficiently justify the exclusion of men from the program.
O'Connor employed an intermediate standard of review to evaluate the state's claims, concluding that the policy did not effectively address existing gender inequalities. She noted that since men could audit classes, the admission policy failed to meet its stated objectives. The decision was met with dissent from several justices, highlighting the complexity of gender-based policies in education and the ongoing debate regarding equal access. This case is significant as it set a precedent for future legal interpretations of gender discrimination and equal protection rights in educational settings.
Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan
Date: July 1, 1982
Citation: 458 U.S. 718
Issue: Sex discrimination
Significance: The Supreme Court required women’s schools to admit male students.
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote the decision her first on the Supreme Court for the 5-4 majority, upholding a young man’s claim that he was discriminated against by not being admitted to a women’s nursing school. Hogan, a young man who lived in Mississippi, claimed the state-supported school’s women-only policy violated his right to equal protection. O’Connor applied an intermediate standard of review, the test developed in Craig v. Boren (1976), and found the state was not persuasive in saying it was trying to redress discrimination against women with its policy, for O’Connor could not see how this policy would help redress the grievances of women. She also ruled that the policy did not further the state’s objective because men were allowed to audit classes. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger and Justices Harry A. Blackmun, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., and William H. Rehnquist dissented.
![Jersey College, an example of an all-girls school By Man vyi (own photo) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons 95330098-92332.jpg](https://imageserver.ebscohost.com/img/embimages/ers/sp/embedded/95330098-92332.jpg?ephost1=dGJyMNHX8kSepq84xNvgOLCmsE2epq5Srqa4SK6WxWXS)
