Mitigating circumstances
Mitigating circumstances refer to specific factors surrounding the commission of a crime that can influence the severity of penalties imposed on a convicted defendant. Unlike aggravating circumstances, which can lead to harsher penalties, mitigating circumstances may serve to justify lesser sentences. These circumstances do not excuse the crime but are relevant in assessing the context of the offense, allowing judges to consider them during sentencing. The extent to which judges can exercise discretion in this regard varies by state, leading to differences in how similar crimes are punished.
In jurisdictions permitting judicial discretion, defense attorneys often highlight mitigating factors to support their clients for reduced sentences. This process involves evaluating attendant circumstances that may make a crime appear less severe. Some states have structured sentencing models that outline mandatory penalties, balancing discretionary judgment with established guidelines based on mitigating, aggravating, and presumptive circumstances. Understanding mitigating circumstances is crucial for grasping how justice systems can adapt penalties to reflect the individual nuances of each case.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Mitigating circumstances
SIGNIFICANCE: Special circumstances surrounding commission of crimes can influence the severity of the penalties given to convicted defendants. Whereas aggravating circumstances can increase the penalties, mitigating circumstances can reduce them.
All crimes are surrounded by facts that must be proven before defendants can be found guilty of them. These are called attendant circumstances. When the attendant circumstances are reasons for regarding the crimes as less severe, they are known as mitigating. When judges are allowed discretion in setting penalties, they usually take the mitigating circumstances into account and lessen the penalties. However, the discretionary powers of judges vary among the states, so the effect of mitigating circumstances on sentences for similar crimes is not the same in all states.
When judicial discretion is allowed, defense attorneys call attention to all the factual circumstances that may persuade judges to award lesser sentences to their clients than they would otherwise. Such circumstances are not in themselves justifications or defenses for the crimes, but they may be considered as reasons for lessening punishments.
When it can be proven that mitigating circumstances have occurred, sentences may be decreased. Some states permit judges limited discretion and have developed their punishment options into mandatory models that specify lengths of sentences. In addition to deciding placements of offenders—prison, probation, or other sentences—these charts also include sentencing ranges based on presumptive, aggravating, and mitigating circumstances.
Bibliography
"Aggravating and Mitigating Factors in Criminal Sentencing Law." Justia, 15 Oct. 2023, www.justia.com/criminal/aggravating-mitigating-factors/. Accessed 8 July 2024.
Garner, Bryan A., ed. Black’s Law Dictionary. 8th ed. St. Paul, Minn.: Thomson/West, 2004.
Hiromoto, Lee, et al. "PTSD and Trauma as Mitigating Factors in Sentencing in Capital Cases." Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, vol. 52, no. 2, 1 June 2024, doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.210052-21. Accessed 8 July 2024.
Wood, J. D., and Linda Picard, eds. Dictionary of Law. Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster, 1996.