Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo is a significant Supreme Court case from the 1930s, which addressed the constitutionality of minimum wage laws aimed at protecting women and children. The Court narrowly ruled by a 5-4 decision that a New York law setting minimum wages for these groups infringed upon the right of employees to freely contract for work, as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause. This ruling sparked widespread dissent and criticism, with an overwhelming majority of newspaper editorials opposing the decision, including pushback from the Republican Party. The case highlighted the tension between labor rights and individual contractual freedoms during a time when economic protections for vulnerable workers were gaining traction. The ruling was ultimately overturned in the later case West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish in 1937, which marked a shift toward upholding minimum wage laws. The dissenting opinions from Justices Hughes, Stone, Brandeis, and Cardozo reflected a growing concern for worker protections amidst a changing economic landscape. Overall, Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo remains a pivotal moment in the discussion of labor rights and constitutional law in the United States.