Perjury

SIGNIFICANCE: Perjury undercuts the constitutional rights and due process of defendants, denies juries access to facts, and undermines respect for and faith in the criminal justice system.

Perjury is willfully swearing as true any material matter the witness does not believe to be true. Attorney and law professor Alan M. Dershowitz claims that the most frequently committed felonies are perjury and false statements, and that false-statement crimes are the most underprosecuted crimes in the United States. Police officer, witness, and defendant perjury is so commonplace that pundits say cases are often decided on a preponderance of perjury. Perjuries, in addition to trial perjury, include filing false tax returns, making false statements to government authorities, and lies, including lies by omission, in testimony or on official documents.

89407967-107627.jpg89407967-107582.jpg89407967-107581.jpg

Perjury represents less than 1 percent of prosecutions, and sentences are often lenient. Perjury enforcement is often for revenge, some political end, legal strategic advantage, or to punish a suspected criminal who is difficult to convict. Suborning perjury is procuring or inciting another to commit perjury, even if no perjury is committed, and is a crime that is rarely prosecuted.

If witnesses believe their claims are true, even if they are not, or do not know that their claims are false, there has been no perjury. This perjury defense encourages police and prosecutors to investigate crimes only to the point where they can attest to enough facts for conviction but not so far as to find contradictory information that negates the facts which police and prosecutors believe to be true. Rather than seeking full and complete truth, police and prosecutors seek only enough attestable facts for conviction.

Proving Perjury

Prosecuting perjury requires the government to prove the person was under oath, that the statement attested to was false, and that the person knew at the time that the testimony was false. The government must have multiple proofs for perjury, such as testimony from more than one witness or other evidence, such as written statements, to support the falsity. Withholding, destroying, or merely failing to collect evidence is a tactic to prevent prosecution for perjury.

Bibliography

Christianson, Scott. Innocent: Inside Wrongful Conviction Cases. New York: New York UP, 2004. Print.

Crank, Stephanie D., and Drew A. Curtis. "And Nothing but the Truth: An Exploration of Perjury." Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, vol. 38, pp. 83-92, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s11896-020-09383-1. Accessed 8 July 2024.

Klockers, Carl, Sanja Ivkovic, and Maria Haberfield, eds. The Contours of Police Integrity. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2004. Print.

Lersch, Kim, ed. Policing and Misconduct. Upper Saddle River: Prentice, 2002. Print.

"Perjury." Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, Jan. 2024, www.law.cornell.edu/wex/perjury. Accessed 8 July 2024.

Sarat, Austin. Law and Lies Deception and Truth-Telling in the American Legal System. New York: Cambridge UP, 2015. Print.

Shuy, Roger W. The Language of Perjury Cases. New York: Oxford UP, 2011. Print.

United States. Congress. The Consequences of Perjury and Related Crimes: Hearing before the (House) Committee on the Judiciary. Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1998. Print.