Pickpocketing

SIGNIFICANCE: As a form of larceny that involves stealing things directly from the persons of victims, pickpocketing is treated as a distinct offense in some jurisdictions because it carries the additional possibility of physically endangering its victims.

A longstanding issue concerning pickpocketing cases is the question of whether pickpocketing offenses should constitute larceny from a person, or simple robbery, because the offender takes property by force. Both larceny and robbery are theft crimes that involve the taking and carrying away of property of others with the intent permanently to deprive the rightful owners of their property. However, larceny differs from robbery in that the former does not involve the use of force or intimidation.

95343006-20400.jpg95343006-20401.jpg

In most pickpocketing cases, offenders are considered guilty of larceny from the person, rather than robbery, because picking pockets requires only enough force to lift and remove the pockets’ contents, with only minimal physical handling of the victims, such as a shove. Acts of pickpocketing that are not resisted are considered larceny. However, when victims become aware of the attempts on their property and offer resistance, or when pickpockets employ violence or intimidation, pickpocketing offenses are considered robbery because violence or the threat of violence is used.

For an act of pickpocketing to be considered a crime, property must be taken from the victim. Most jurisdictions also require that the property must be carried away from the scene of the crime—an aspect called asporation. In pickpocket cases, a question that frequently arises is whether there has been sufficient asporation. However, the court system has consistently held that any asporation, however slight, is sufficient. Thus, it is not necessary for a pickpocket actually to remove an item from a pocket. Rather, it is sufficient for the pickpocket to have complete control of the item, even for only an instant. Therefore, a pickpocket who moves a victim’s wallet only three inches before being caught satisfies the asporation requirement. On the other hand, pickpockets who are detected before their hands actually seize items can be convicted only of attempted pickpocketing.

Bibliography

Appo, George. The Urban Underworld in Late Nineteenth-Century New York: The Autobiography of George Appo. Timothy J. Gilfoyle, editor. Bedford/St. Martin's, 2013.

Samaha, J. Criminal Law. 8th ed. Belmont, Calif.: Thomson/Wadsworth, 2004.

Schlicher, Loe, and Virginie Lurkin. "Fighting Pickpocketing Using a Choice-Based Resource Allocation Model." European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 315, no. 2, 2024, pp. 580-595. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.12.007. Accessed 8 July 2024.

Yeager, Wayne B. Techniques of the Professional Pickpocket. Port Townsend, Wash.: Loompanics Unlimited, 1990.