Riparian Rights
Riparian rights refer to the entitlements of landowners whose property borders flowing water sources, such as rivers and streams, allowing them to use the water for various purposes such as irrigation, hunting, and fishing. This legal doctrine, primarily rooted in English common law, is predominantly practiced in the eastern United States, where water resources have historically been viewed as ample. Under this system, water rights are tied to land ownership and aim to ensure equitable sharing during times of scarcity. However, growing concerns regarding environmental sustainability and water scarcity have prompted significant modifications to how these rights are applied.
In contrast, western states operate under a different framework known as prior appropriation, which prioritizes water use based on the timing of claims rather than land ownership. The increasing demand for water, coupled with erratic precipitation patterns and the recognition of ecological needs, has led to tensions within existing water management frameworks. Many eastern states have begun to implement administrative permit systems to regulate water use more effectively, balancing private rights with public interests. Ultimately, the evolution of riparian rights reflects an ongoing effort to reconcile human water consumption with the need to preserve vital ecosystems and resources.
On this Page
Riparian Rights
DEFINITION: Benefits associated with the use of water for owners of land bordering on or adjacent to flowing water sources such as rivers and streams
Concerns regarding environmental issues and water scarcity have led to some modifications of the traditional doctrine of riparian rights as it is applied in the eastern United States.
The roots of the US system of for water usage can be traced back to English common law. Riparian rights and other water laws attempt to reconcile the various demands of users and potential users with the size of the supply of clean water. Increasing demands for water use, coupled with the relative scarcity of adequate water resources and the growing recognition of the importance of protection, have resulted in changing and evolving systems of water law and regulation in the United States.
![Loynton Moss , Glacial Kettle Hole - geograph.org.uk - 719014. Loynton Moss : Glacial Kettle Hole Loynton Moss (formerly Blakemere) is one of a number of Meres and Mosses of glacial origin found in the north west midlands area of Staffordshire, Shropshire, Cheshire and Clwyd. Loynton Moss was formed as a result of gl. John Harvey [CC-BY-SA-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons 89474408-74363.jpg](https://imageserver.ebscohost.com/img/embimages/ers/sp/embedded/89474408-74363.jpg?ephost1=dGJyMNHX8kSepq84xNvgOLCmsE2epq5Srqa4SK6WxWXS)
Two basic water law systems exist for dealing with water-use conflicts in the United States. The eastern states, historically viewed as having adequate water resources, predominantly follow the doctrine of riparian rights. Under this doctrine, water-use rights are based on landownership and require equal sharing among users in times of shortage. Riparian rights typically include the right to hunt and fish and the right to use water for irrigation. The western states, historically seen as lacking abundant water resources, have adopted a system based on the doctrine of prior appropriation, which establishes priorities among competitive users. Under this doctrine, earlier settlers have greater rights to water use. The western water law system developed as a means of encouraging economic development by allowing water rights to be separated from landownership. The right to consume water accessible from one’s land is the primary difference between riparian rights and appropriative rights.
Riparian rights treat water resources as a common property, which permits individual users to use the resource freely while spreading the cost of additional resource use to all owners of the resource. As Garrett Hardin warned, overuse of common property resources can result in a “tragedy of the commons.” Increasing demands for water, as well as demands that water be used more efficiently and responsibly, have created tensions within the existing schemes of water rights and water management. Erratic precipitation and rising per capita water use have led to a number of water emergencies. Likewise, many states now recognize the importance of letting river waters remain untapped to protect fish and wildlife, as well as to preserve aesthetic and recreational values.
Environmental concerns and issues of water scarcity have led to significant modifications of water law systems. The only restriction on water use under the traditional riparian system is a prohibition against “unreasonable harm” to another riparian user. The absence of an efficient, systemwide mechanism to determine what constitute unreasonable uses and to manage water resources successfully has led eastern states to reconsider how water should be allocated among competing uses, and most eastern states have instituted administrative permit systems to regulate riparian rights. Under such a system, a single agency manages issues of water quality and allocation. The agency is also charged with defining and maintaining some minimum water quality and flow. Such modifications to riparian right systems attempt to protect private values and further public interests. As the evolution of riparian rights suggests, successful methods of allocating water must balance a watershed’s consumptive water resources needs with its ecological needs.
Bibliography
Amer. Soc. of Civil Engineers. Regulated Riparian Model Water Code. Reston: ASCE, 2004. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost). Web. 28 Dec. 2015.
Andrews, Richard N. L. Managing the Environment, Managing Ourselves: A History of American Environmental Policy. 2d ed. New Haven: Yale UP, 2006. Print.
Dellapenna, Joseph W. “The Evolution of Riparianism in the United States.” Marquette Law Review 95.1 (2011): 53–90. Index to Legal Periodicals & Books Full Text (H. W. Wilson), scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol95/iss1/7/. Accessed 22 July 2024.
Ferrey, Steven. “Rights to Use Water.” In Environmental Law: Examples and Explanations. 5th ed. New York: Aspen, 2010. Print.
"Riparian Doctrine." Cornell Law School, April 2024, www.law.cornell.edu/wex/riparian‗doctrine. Accessed 22 July 2024.
Vandas, Stephen J., Thomas C. Winter, and William A. Battaglin. Water and the Environment. Alexandria: Amer. Geological Inst., 2002. Print.
Zisopoulou, Kalomoira, Dimitris Zisopoulos, and Dionysia Panagoulia. "Water Economics: An In-Depth Analysis of the Connection of Blue Water with Some Primary Level Aspects of Economic Theory." Water, vol. 14, no. 1, 4 Jan. 2022, DOI: 10.3390/w14010103. Accessed 22 July 2024.