Stakeouts
Stakeouts are specialized police operations designed to monitor suspicious activities or individuals, often involving potentially dangerous situations with armed suspects. They are categorized into two types: temporary and planned. Temporary stakeouts arise spontaneously in response to immediate threats or ongoing criminal activities, demanding high levels of alertness and discretion from officers to avoid detection. These operations are often depicted in media as exciting endeavors, but in reality, they are usually prolonged, tedious, and require continuous strategic planning.
Planned stakeouts, on the other hand, involve meticulous coordination among team members and are typically executed based on detailed crime analysis, such as identifying patterns in criminal behavior. Successful stakeouts necessitate officers blending into the environment to avoid being recognized, as prolonged visibility can compromise the operation. Overall, while stakeouts can play a significant role in preventing criminal activities, they are complex undertakings that are more understated and demanding than popular portrayals suggest.
On this Page
Stakeouts
Definition: Tactical deployments of law-enforcement officers to specific locations for the purpose of surreptitiously observing criminal suspects to gather information or to stop crimes from occurring
Significance: Stakeouts are frequently high-profile tactical operations that can present risks to officers, offenders, and bystanders alike. As forms of police intervention, they may involve armed and violent criminal suspects. To avoid exposure and to minimize risks, stakeouts require careful tactical planning and complex team efforts.
The action-packed portrayals of police stakeouts that are often presented in novels, films, and television shows are misleading. The fictional kinds of stakeouts, in which police officers sit in vehicles for an hour or so and then arrest multiple suspects, would rarely succeed in real life. Real stakeouts tend to be undramatic, tedious, and personally demanding.
Stakeouts take two basic forms: temporary and planned. Temporary stakeouts tend to be impromptu actions, undertaken as unexpected situations develop. They can also be high-risk operations. Most temporary or impromptu stakeouts result when officers are in the preliminary stages of investigations or discover pending criminal activity that requires immediate action.
To succeed, surveillance and stakeout teams must blend into neighborhoods to avoid being detected themselves. Fictional stakeouts often show officers sitting in their cars for hours in the suspects’ neighborhoods. However, occupied vehicles parked for prolonged periods rarely go unnoticed. If investigators fail to be in harmony with their surroundings, they are likely to be identified, or—in stakeout jargon—“burned” or “made.” The best results in temporary stakeouts occur when they are conducted from fixed and secure positions, such as buildings.
Planned stakeouts are more complex operations, whose success results from team efforts, not lone detective improvisation. Stakeout operations may offer opportunities to interrupt serial offenses, such as robbery, drug deals, and other offenses. For example, a crime analyst studying convenience-store robberies who discovers patterns in the methods of the robberies and trademark behaviors of the robbers would have reason to suspect that the robberies are part of a series. Moreover, the analyst might even see something in the patterns to suggest that certain stores are likely to be hit next. Drawing on the conclusions of this crime analysis, a police lieutenant would organize a surveillance team to stake out the threatened stores. A major operation might have teams working both inside and outside the stores, so that careful coordination of their efforts would have be planned in advance.
Bibliography
Adams, James A., and Daniel D. Blinka. Electronic Surveillance: Commentaries and Statutes. Notre Dame, Ind.: National Institute for Trial Advocacy, 2003.
Lyman, Michael D., and Gary W. Potter. Organized Crime. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 2004.
Monmonier, M. S. Spying with Maps: Surveillance Technologies and the Future of Privacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.
Rossmo, D. Kim. Geographic Profiling. Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press, 2000.