Testimony

SIGNIFICANCE: Testimony is critical in criminal trials because it provides support for arguments and positions advocated by either side in a legal proceeding.

Although testimony can loosely be defined as evidence, it is distinguishable from evidence derived from writings or other sources. For evidence to be testimony, a witness must present it under oath to a judge or tribunal, in person or through a sworn deposition.

95343132-20570.jpg95343132-20571.jpg

Testimony is a component in three aspects of the legal process: grand jury hearings, preliminary hearings, and trials. A grand jury consists of a body of citizens who determine if there is probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed. In order to make that determination, they hear testimony from witnesses presented by the state, or prosecution. If they determine that probable cause exists, they return an indictment against the defendant. In a preliminary hearing, a judge hears testimony from prosecution witnesses and makes a decision as to whether or not an individual should be held for trial. In a criminal or civil trial, witnesses are questioned through direct and cross-examination, and a judge or jury listens to the testimony in order to reach a verdict. In all three instances, witnesses take oaths in which they swear or affirm to tell the truth.

Testimony in a grand jury is usually secret and is not used in later trials. However, testimony in a preliminary hearing is preserved for later use, either by a court reporter or a tape recorder. The testimony provided in a preliminary hearing might be used in a trial to refresh a witness’s memory or to demonstrate inconsistencies in the testimony. The testimony in a preliminary hearing may also be used at trial if a witness dies or becomes unavailable to testify.

The prosecution in a criminal case and the plaintiff in a civil case present their testimony first because they have the burden of proof. Testimony is provided in brief question and answer format; witnesses usually do not tell their stories in a continuous narrative. In direct examination, the attorneys question the witnesses who support their side of a case. Typically, the questions are open-ended in order for the witnesses to elaborate on their testimony, thus presenting a strong case. In cross-examination, the attorneys question the witnesses on the opposing side. The attorney may attempt to obtain testimony by using closed-ended or leading questions so that the witness does not have a chance to elaborate on answers. During closing arguments, attorneys make convincing arguments and provide reasons for the jurors or judge to return a verdict in their favor. They draw on the testimony of witnesses to help support their arguments.

Bibliography

"Legal Guide for the Forensic Expert." National Institute of Justice, 7 Aug. 2023, legal-info.lawyers.com/criminal/criminal-law-basics/witness-presentation-and-order.html. Accessed 11 July 2024.

Loftus, Elizabeth F. Eyewitness Testimony. 2d ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996.

Pirius, Rebecca. "Witness Testimony at Criminal Trials." Lawyers.com, 8 Nov. 2023, legal-info.lawyers.com/criminal/criminal-law-basics/witness-presentation-and-order.html. Accessed 11 July 2024.

Weiss, K. “Confessions and Expert Testimony.” Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 31 (2003): 451-458.

Wrightsman, L. S., E. Greene, M. T. Nietzel, and W. H. Fortune. Psychology and the Legal System. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 2002.