United States v. Lovett

Date: June 3, 1946

Citation: 238 U.S. 303

Issue: Bill of attainder

Significance: The Supreme Court held that the portion of a federal statute prohibiting three named federal employees from receiving governmental compensation was an unconstitutional bill of attainder.

During the early period of the Cold War, a rider to an appropriations statute denied compensation for three persons branded as “subversives” by the House Un-American Activities Committee. Speaking for an 8-0 majority, Justice Hugo L. Black wrote that a legislative act that inflicts punishment on either particular individuals or “easily ascertainable members of a group” without a judicial trial is a bill of attainder.

95330465-92655.jpg95330465-93275.jpg

Expanding on the Lovett decision, the Supreme Court in United States v. Brown (1950) struck down a statute that prohibited Communist Party members from serving as officers of trade unions because the measure punished “easily ascertainable members of a group.” In Nixon v. Administrator of General Services (1977), however, the Court rejected former president Richard M. Nixon’s contention that a statute giving the general services administration control over his presidential papers and recordings was a bill of attainder.