United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association
**Overview of United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association**
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association was a significant Supreme Court case decided in 1944 that addressed the regulation of insurance companies and their classification under interstate commerce. Historically, the Court had ruled that insurance policies were not considered interstate commerce, allowing states to regulate the industry without federal interference. However, this case arose when the U.S. Justice Department accused the South-Eastern Underwriters Association of engaging in price fixing, violating the Sherman Antitrust Act.
In a narrow 4-3 decision, the Supreme Court, led by Justice Hugo L. Black, overturned previous precedents, concluding that insurance transactions that crossed state lines did constitute interstate commerce and fell under federal jurisdiction. This ruling effectively enabled federal regulation of the insurance industry. In response, Congress enacted the McCarran-Ferguson Act in 1945 to reaffirm state authority over insurance, clarifying that federal law did not preempt state regulation unless explicitly stated. This case marked a turning point in the relationship between state and federal powers regarding insurance, highlighting ongoing debates about regulation and commerce in the United States.
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association
Date: June 5, 1944
Citation: 322 U.S. 533
Issues: Reversals of Court decisions by Congress; commerce clause
Significance: The Supreme Court’s ruling was soon superseded by a law enacted by Congress.
Beginning in the mid-nineteenth century, the Supreme Court had consistently held that insurance policies were not interstate commerce and that states were free to regulate the industry, including out-of-state companies that wrote policies in their states. However, the U.S. Justice Department sued the South-Eastern Underwriters Association for price fixing under the Sherman Antitrust Act (1890).
![Supreme Court Justice Hugo La Fayette Black. By Harris & Ewing photography firm [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons 95330356-92523.jpg](https://imageserver.ebscohost.com/img/embimages/ers/sp/embedded/95330356-92523.jpg?ephost1=dGJyMNHX8kSepq84xNvgOLCmsE2epq5Srqa4SK6WxWXS)

By a 4-3 vote, the Supreme found against the underwriters association. In his opinion for the Court, Justice Hugo L. Black explained away several precedential holdings, saying they were all state laws and this case turned on a federal statute. He found that insurance companies conducting a substantial portion of their business across state lines were engaged in interstate commerce and subject to the Sherman Antitrust Act. Congress disagreed and passed the 1945 McCarren Act specifying that no congressional enactment should be interpreted as preempting state authority over insurance unless the act specifically asserted federal authority, thereby overturning the Court.