365 Days by Ronald Glasser
"365 Days" by Ronald Glasser is a reflective narrative that captures the experiences of soldiers and medical personnel during the Vietnam War, particularly focusing on the unique setting of Camp Zama, Japan, where Glasser served as a medical officer. Arriving in 1968, he anticipated caring for the children of military families but instead confronted the grim realities of war, as Camp Zama functioned as a critical evacuation center for wounded soldiers from Vietnam. The book comprises seventeen interconnected sketches that portray moments of crisis faced by these soldiers, emphasizing their bravery, confusion, and dedication amidst the chaos of combat.
Glasser's sketches range in length and intensity, detailing both soldier experiences in the field and the medical corps' efforts to treat the wounded. Notable narratives include the poignant stories of individual soldiers and the medical staff who care for them, highlighting the emotional and psychological scars that remain long after the physical wounds heal. The title “365 Days” reflects the tour of duty that soldiers experience; however, Glasser illustrates that the war's impact endures far beyond this time frame. Critically, the book has faced controversy due to its language and stark depiction of war, yet it is defended by many as a truthful representation of a soldier's reality. Overall, "365 Days" serves as a powerful exploration of the complex and enduring effects of the Vietnam War on those who fought and cared for its casualties.
365 Days by Ronald Glasser
First published: 1971
Type of work: Essays/history/psychology
Time of work: 1968-1970
Locale: The United States, Vietnam, and Japan
Principal Personage:
Ronald Glasser , a medical doctor working for the United States Army during the Vietnam War
Form and Content
As Ronald Glasser notes in his foreword to 365 Days, he arrived at Camp Zama, in Japan, in September of 1968. Educated at The Johns Hopkins University, where he was a Phi Beta Kappa graduate in 1961, and at The Johns Hopkins Medical School, where he completed his M.D. degree in 1965, he undertook three years of specialized training in pediatrics at the University of Minnesota Medical School. With that background, he had expected to be treating the dependent children of those soldiers stationed in Japan. What he encountered, however, was the horror of war, for Camp Zama, with its seven-hundred-bed hospital, served as a United States Army evacuation center for soldiers needing more extensive care than was available in Vietnam. As he remarks, Zama is the only general hospital in Japan; Glasser is proud of having served in this large, modern, and efficient facility, where “literally thousands of boys were saved” during his two-year assignment in the army.
Glasser is also clearly proud of the soldiers he comes to know at Zama. Although these young soldiers are no more than “boys,” they are brave and stoic and honest. They are also confused; as the soldier’s poem which serves as the epigraph for the first story says, “Even those who make it home/ Carry back a scar.” From knowing these soldiers, Glasser feels the obligation “to give something to these kids that was all theirs without doctrine or polemics, something they could use to explain what they might not be able to explain themselves.” Because Glasser believes that “there is no novel in Nam, there is not enough for a plot,” what he offers instead are “sketches, not finished stories.” Yet here, as elsewhere, he understates his point, for the seventeen sketches contained in 365 Days are built on a carefully interconnected series of motifs. Reminiscent in pattern of James Joyce’s Dubliners (1914), the book also reminds one of the work of Stephen Crane, to whose memory the book is dedicated.
Of the seventeen essays, eight of them focus on the soldiers’ lives in Vietnam, and one examines the training of a young officer before he departs the United States. Ranging in length from two to fifteen pages, the essays depict moments of crisis for the soldiers. In “Mayfield,” for example, the central character is a forty-three-year-old first sergeant involved in the war in the delta of southern South Vietnam. The reader sees the war through Mayfield’s eyes:
Strange war. Going for something they didn’t believe in or for that matter didn’t care about, just to make it 365 days and be done with it. They’d go, though; even freaked out, they’d go. They’d do whatever he told them. . . . They’d do it, and if led right, they’d do it well.
That quality of dedication, to survival and to their unit, is seen at the end of the sketch, when Mayfield himself is wounded but orchestrates his troops, F-4 tactical air support, and medical evacuation helicopters into an effective fighting team. Similarly, in “Track Unit,” the reader observes Deneen, a young lieutenant assigned unexpectedly to tanks, take command in the heat of his first firefight. Although later wounded, Deneen recognizes his skill and is anxious to return to his position as a commander. The sketch ends with Glasser’s admission that it is his duty to assign him a medical profile to make this possible.
The remaining eight sketches either directly or indirectly focus on the medical corps that cares for the wounded soldier. Like the soldiers’ stories, these range in length also. At one extreme is a three-page sketch of an unnamed soldier who expires after being mutilated during the explosion of a Chinese Communist mine. A thirty-two-page piece titled “Gentlemen, It Works” centers on a transcription of a briefing which explains the psychological effects of combat stress. Several other sketches describe more directly the medical corps personnel: “Joan,” for example, relates the story of a nurse working at a surgical hospital in Vietnam; “Choppers” tells of the rigors of medical evacuation helicopter duty; “Medics,” similarly, consists of short, poignant vignettes of the medical troops assigned to frontline combat units.
The first and final sketches form a matched pair. Set in Camp Zama, these pieces depict graphically the interactions of the evacuation hospital’s medical staff with the wounded soldiers. In the first, Dr. Peterson serves as the central figure, treating Robert Kurt, a member of the 101st Airborne Division in Vietnam. Despite a life-threatening leg wound, Kurt recovers; as he does, however, his confidence in his ability to rejoin the elite division declines. Close to the end of his tour, Peterson convinces the soldier to return home rather than rejoin his unit. In the final piece, Dr. Edwards fights valiantly, but in vain, to save the life of a badly burned soldier, David Jensen. The soldier’s final dying words—“I don’t want to go home alone”— remind Edwards of his own trip home with the casket of his dead brother and remind the reader of the irony of the book’s title, 365 Days: The war cannot simply be erased at the end of a finite tour of duty.
Both the foreword and the glossary are significant parts of 365 Days. In the foreword Glasser comments, “If you survive 365 days . . . you simply go home,” but the stories demonstrate that the war lives on indefinitely, both for the soldiers and for the medical corps—and particularly for the author. Indeed, in presenting a combined “Glossary of Military and Medical Terms” at the end of the narrative, Glasser is suggesting a close relationship between those who served in the medical corps and those who served as combat soldiers.
Critical Context
In commenting on “Brock,” one early critic of Vietnam War literature observed that this piece demonstrates
the unique serviceability of the shorter fictional modes in coming to terms with the sense of episodic randomness and strange fragmentation that so often seemed to characterize one’s vision of the actual experience of the war.
Yet “Brock,” which is not—strictly speaking—“fictional,” does more than this in the context of the book as a whole, for it is here that the central themes coalesce most clearly. What appears in this story is reinforced, or repeated with variation, in other sketches in the narrative. Rather than being seventeen discrete sketches, 365 Days displays, in its concern for social, medical, and military issues, a thematic unity that emphasizes the encompassing nature of the Vietnam War experience. In this it bears a remarkable likeness to Walt Whitman’s meditations on the Civil War, Specimen Days and Collect (1882-1883), and Ernest Hemingway’s tales of World War I, In Our Time (1924).
Despite the artistry of this nonfiction narrative, however, it has not escaped social criticism. Ostensibly for its liberal use of obscenities, the narrative was banned in 1981 from a high school library in Baileyville, Maine. Reaching a federal district court in Bangor in December, 1981, the controversy received some press coverage and eventual notoriety. Indeed, the library had housed only fourteen books on Vietnam, two of them nonfiction; one of these, Philip Caputo’s A Rumor of War (1977), used more obscenities than did 365 Days. Several veterans testified in court that the obscene language in 365 Days added verisimilitude, that the book told the truth about Vietnam, and that “to censor the language in that book would be to deprive them of their own history.” Although Glasser himself appeared at the trial, it was not until the spring of 1982 that the book was allowed back on the library shelves.
In his next three books, Glasser turned more directly toward the medical profession: In Ward 402 (1973), he focuses on an eleven-year-old-girl who dies of leukemia after receiving controversial medical treatment; in The Body Is the Hero (1976), he relates the history of the science of immunology, beginning with Louis Pasteur; and in The Greatest Battle (1976), he advances his own theories about the genesis and prognosis of certain types of cancers and the problems inherent in the accepted forms of research. These works, however, seem to have left him unfulfilled. In 1985, rejecting his own statement, “If there is more to be said [about Vietnam] it will have to be said by others,” he returned to this subject in his first fictional narrative, Another War, Another Peace. In this book Glasser wrote explicitly about what is merely implied in 365 Days—that, for the survivors of the war, its effects linger. The central figure, a young man stationed first in Vietnam and then reassigned to Camp Zama, exhibits the typical psychological manifestations of survivor guilt.
Bibliography
FitzGerald, Frances. “A Reporter at Large: A Disagreement in Baileyville,” in The New Yorker. LX (January 16, 1984), pp. 47-90.
Lask, Thomas. “Vietnam: Children’s Crusade,” in The New York Times Book Review. LXXVI (September 11, 1971), p. 25.
Polner, Murray. Review in Saturday Review. LIV (September 11, 1971), pp. 46-47.
Prescott, Peter S. “The ‘Dignity’ of Battle,” in Newsweek. LXXVIII (September 13, 1971), p. 99.
Simpson, Louis. “Nothing to Show But Their Wounds,” in The Listener. LXXXVII (June 1, 1972), pp. 735-736.