The Children of Men by P. D. James

Excerpted from an article in Magill’s Survey of World Literature, Revised Edition

First published: 1992

Type of work: Novel

The Work

The phrase “children of God” suggests divine guidance, human potential, and the hope of redemption, while James’s title The Children of Men, a derogatory phrase reminiscent of Old Testament diction, suggests human frailty, a fall from grace, impermanence, and the dark side of the human spirit—cruelty, violence, and a lust for power. In an age in which no child has been born in twenty-six years, adults burdened by guilty pasts face the nightmarish end of the human species. Human achievements lose their grandeur and their potential to inspire as they meld into the landscape. It is a time for Ozymandian contemplation, carpe diem, and a human accounting before the world’s demise. Such are the thoughts of Oxford historian and erudite narrator Theodore Faron, who escapes responsibility for the present by taking a slow journey, revisiting European centers of art and architecture in the interim between the two sections of James’s novel. In this science-fiction vision of the very near future, James reverses their standard order to identify the first part, “Book One: Omega,” and the second part, “Book Two: Alpha.”

Thus, book 1 depicts a dystopian winding down, a retrenching of human civilizations, a movement from rural isolation to urban security, and an increasingly powerful and tyrannical government and military, as roving bands of bacchanalian thugs engage in sadistic sacrificial rites, and, in general, the threads of morality and social structure break. In England, Faron’s cousin, a power-proud First Warden, makes life and death decisions, condemning rebellious citizens to terrifying island penal colonies where the inmates rule, approving military-assisted mass suicides, and in every instance governing with an iron fist. In effect, James’s speculation queries how far national control might be extended under the guise of protecting the citizenry from terrorist-labeled activities. She also envisions heightened psychoses, as frustrated women fake pregnancies and fantasize about motherhood.

Faron’s understanding of history, his delight in the Victorian past, and his love of Jane Austen (Emma is the book he chooses for his defiant journey with revolutionaries), provide a distanced, scholarly, ironic study of the times, and his past association with the present ruler enables him to provide a contrast in psychologies between himself and his cousin, to analyze the journey that led his cousin to this power, and to predict his behavior in the face of mystery.

The mystery of book 2, a morality tale, echoes the religious story of Mary and the Infant Jesus pursued by Herod and protected by an awed band of worshippers, in this case people willing to die themselves so that mother and child can thrive. The action therein moves forward like a mystery as well, with traitors whose egos take dominance over philosophical commitments, and with a final murder that changes the future and forces a decent man to step into a power he has not wanted—for the good of humankind. Ironically, it is the only known fertile male who sacrifices himself for his infant. The story ends with hope for regeneration tempered by an understanding of the fallen nature of humankind that requires justice, as well as mercy. In this way, James’s take on the future is in keeping with the hard truths of her detective fiction—so much awry in human nature and yet some hope based on frail, unlikely humans who stand up when it counts. The ambiguous mix of hope and cynicism at the end is meant to leave readers pondering the way in which good intentions can be turned awry in politics, as in daily life.

Sources for Further Study

The Christian Science Monitor. March 16, 1993, p.14.

Commonweal. CXX, April 23, 1993, p.26.

Locus. XXX, April, 1993, p.17.

Los Angeles Times Book Review. April 4, 1993, p.12.

New Scientist. CXXXVII, March 20, 1993, p 41.

The New York Times Book Review. XCVIII, March 28, 1993, p.23.

The New Yorker. LXIX, March 22, 1993, p.111.

Time. CXLI, March 1, 1993, p.69.

The Times Literary Supplement. September 25, 1992, p.26.

The Wall Street Journal. February 19, 1993, p. A12.