The Dumb Waiter by Harold Pinter
"The Dumb Waiter" is a one-act play by Harold Pinter, first performed in 1959. The narrative centers around two hitmen, Ben and Gus, who find themselves in a stark basement room waiting for instructions from an unseen employer. The play explores themes of existentialism, alienation, and the unsettling nature of communication, as Ben reads from newspapers and Gus expresses his dissatisfaction with their isolated circumstances. Tension builds as Gus questions their situation, including the mysterious function of a dumbwaiter that delivers food orders but raises further questions about their role and reliability in their criminal tasks. Throughout the play, Pinter uses minimalistic dialogue and pauses to enhance the sense of unease, prompting reflections on authority and the absurdity of their existence. The characters' interactions reveal deeper anxieties about their purpose and the implications of their work, culminating in a dramatic confrontation that leaves both men in a state of uncertainty. "The Dumb Waiter" serves as a poignant examination of the human condition, framed by Pinter’s signature style.
On this Page
The Dumb Waiter by Harold Pinter
First produced: 1959; first published, 1960, in The Birthday Party
Type of work: Drama
Type of plot: Absurdist
Time of plot: Mid-twentieth century
Locale: England
Principal characters
Ben , a hit manGus , his fellow hit man
The Story:
Ben and Gus are in a basement room with two beds and a closed serving-hatch between the beds. Ben reads aloud two different stories from the newspaper. Gus complains about the room not having a window, about coming in the dark to a strange place, sleeping all day, doing the job, and going away again in the dark. Ben says that Gus needs hobbies, like his own woodwork. Gus wants Ben to tell him why Ben stopped the car in the middle of the road, when it was still dark, that morning. Ben says that he thought Gus was asleep, that he was not waiting for anything, and that they were too early. When Gus objects that they did as they were told, Ben replies that he, not Gus, took the call. Ben repeats that they were too early but refuses to say more.
![Pinter in December 2005 By Illuminations Films [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html) or CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons mp4-sp-ency-lit-255002-145872.jpg](https://imageserver.ebscohost.com/img/embimages/ers/sp/embedded/mp4-sp-ency-lit-255002-145872.jpg?ephost1=dGJyMNHX8kSepq84xNvgOLCmsE2epq5Srqa4SK6WxWXS)
Gus wants to know what town they are in (Ben says Birmingham) and, since it is Friday, he wants to go to watch the football team the next day (Ben says there is no time). Gus reminisces about the Birmingham Villa team losing a game in a disputed penalty to the White Shirts. Gus remembers that the other team was from Tottenham, so that the game was in Birmingham. Ben says he was not there, yet he disagrees emphatically about the penalty and denies that the game was in Birmingham. An envelope slides under the door. Gus sees it, unseals it, and finds twelve matches but no writing.
When Ben tells him to “light the kettle,” Gus responds that Ben means “light the gas” and “put on the kettle.” Ben refuses to back down. When Gus persists, Ben asserts that he is the senior partner and then loses his temper, grabbing Gus by the throat. Gus tries to make tea, but there is a meter on the stove, and neither of them has any money. Gus laments that Wilson did not do well by them, such as leave enough gas available for a cup of tea. He has questions for Wilson but finds Wilson difficult to talk to. Gus wants to know if anyone cleans up after they are gone, and who that would be if so. Another question occurs to him: How many jobs did the two of them do? What if no one ever cleaned up? Ben points out that their employer has departments for everything. The noise of the dumbwaiter descending makes them grab their revolvers. Gus opens the dumbwaiter and removes a piece of paper that reads “Two braised steak and chips. Two sago puddings. Two teas without sugar.”
Ben says the place is probably under new management. Gus wants to know who has it now. A second piece of paper reads “Soup of the day. Liver and onions. Jam tart.” Ben looks in the serving hatch but not up it. When Gus puts his finger to his mouth and looks up the hatch, Ben is alarmed. The meager contents of Gus’s bag are brought out and put on a plate, but the dumbwaiter has already gone up. Gus questions how a gas stove with three rings can service a busy place? What happens when no one is there? Were those menus coming down and going up for years? The third piece of paper reads “Macaroni Pastitsio. Ormitha Macarounada.” Gus puts the plate in the box and calls the contents up the hatch. Ben corrects Gus for shouting.
Gus wants to know if there is another kitchen, other gas stoves. Why, he wonders, did Wilson not get in touch? Does Ben believe that the two of them are unreliable? (Ben says nothing.) The box comes down. The fourth note reads “One Bamboo Shoots, Water Chestnuts, and Chicken. One Char Siu and beansprouts.” Their packet of tea is sent back.
A speaking tube is suddenly discovered, and Gus does not understand why he did not see it before. Gus follows Ben’s directions—blowing into it, then speaking—but he cannot hear anything. Ben takes the tube and listens and talks into it. The voice on the other end, Ben tells Gus, said everything they sent up was defective. Ben gives Gus his instructions, but he forgets to tell Gus to take out his gun—which Ben never omitted before.
Gus wants to know what they would do if it is a girl—the mess made by the girl on their last job bothered Gus—but Ben replies they will do just the same.
Gus points out that they passed their tests years ago. They took the tests together; they proved themselves. What is he playing these games for? The fifth note reads “Scampi.” Gus yells up that they have nothing left. Ben seizes the tube from Gus, hangs it up, goes back to his bed, and picks up the paper. Gus exits left. The whistle on the speaking tube goes off. Ben answers, notes that the usual procedure would be followed, and says they are ready. Ben goes to the left, and the door to the right opens. Ben turns and levels his revolver at the door. Gus stumbles in, stripped of jacket, waistcoat, tie, holster, and revolver. Gus and Ben stare at each other in silence.
Bibliography
Baker, William. Harold Pinter. London: Continuum, 2008. Brief critical biography examining the themes, patterns, relationships, and ideas that are common to Pinter’s life and writings.
Billington, Michael. Harold Pinter. London: Faber and Faber, 2007. Critical biography focusing on literary analysis of Pinter’s works. Discusses the major plays at length, providing information about their literary and biographical sources.
Burkman, Katherine H. The Dramatic World of Harold Pinter: Its Basis in Ritual. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1971. A provocative study, with notes, bibliography, and index.
Esslin, Martin. Pinter: The Playwright. 6th exp. and rev. ed. London: Methuen, 2000. Comprehensive analytical survey of Pinter’s writing career, offering critical commentary on all of his plays.
Hynes, Joseph. “Pinter and Morality.” Virginia Quarterly Review 68 (Autumn, 1992): 740-752. Examines Pinter’s comedy and compares his work to that of Henrik Ibsen and George Bernard Shaw.
Kennedy, Andrew. Six Dramatists in Search of a Language: Shaw, Eliot, Beckett, Pinter, Osborne, Arden. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1975. Focuses on Pinter’s use of language. Includes bibliography and index.
Raby, Peter, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Harold Pinter. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Collection of essays, including discussions of Pinter, politics, and postmodernism; Pinter and the critics; Pinter and the twentieth century theater; and a piece by director Peter Hall about directing Pinter’s plays. The numerous references to The Dumb Waiter are listed in a separate index of Pinter’s works.
Schroll, Herman T. Harold Pinter: A Study of His Reputation (1958-1969) and a Checklist. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press, 1971. Argues that Pinter’s works have lasting significance. Includes bibliography and index.